Protection of Cultural Heritage of Ukraine in the Context of the Russo-Ukrainian War
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2025.01.096Keywords:
cultural heritage, Russo-Ukrainian war, museums, religious and artistic buildings, international humanitarian law, UNESCOAbstract
The aim is to analyze the scale of destruction of Ukraine’s cultural heritage in the conditions of the Russo-Ukrainian war, which is increasing and reaching irreparable losses, to identify threats to Ukraine’s cultural heritage sites, to consider facts indicating frequent violations of international treaties and conventions related to the protection of cultural values on temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, and to develop possible ways of restoring the damaged cultural heritage in the post-war period, using the experience of countries that have experienced armed conflicts, which will help integrate Ukraine into the world cultural community.
The research methodology is based on the application of general scientific methods of historical and logical research, methods of comparative and statistical analysis (when studying various stages of the Russo-Ukrainian war and the degree of destruction of cultural monuments), the principle of objectivity using historical-systemic and comparative-historical methods (when putting forward the use of the experience of other states that have historically passed the war phase), synergetic, cultural, and axiological approaches (to draw parallels of the historical-social and moral-spiritual variety), and cognitive principles. Documents systematizing the mechanisms of cultural heritage protection are studied based on content analysis methodolog y.
The scientific novelty of the research lies in determining the reasons for attacks on Ukraine’s cultural heritage sites, starting from covert aggression to the open phase of the war of Russia against the sovereign state of Ukraine from 2014 to 2024. Significant experience in overcoming the consequences of the destruction of cultural heritage in countries that have experienced armed conflicts has been analyzed. The activities of UNESCO and other international governmental and non-governmental organizations in improving international humanitarian law in the new conditions of global realities and developing effective mechanisms for protecting cultural heritage sites in the context of the Russian Federation’s war against independent Ukraine have been considered. The problem of restitution of cultural values seized by the Russians in temporarily occupied territories has been analyzed. The main directions of the Ukrainian government’s and other monument protection institutions’ activities regarding the preservation, restoration of destroyed, and return of stolen cultural values and objects of cultural heritage in the conditions of war and post-war conditions have been outlined.
The main results. The full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation in February 2022, as a continuation of the hybrid war, became the biggest challenge for Ukrainian culture throughout the existence of independent Ukraine. Contrary to the entire civilized world, the Russians violated the principles of international security. It has become a global geopolitical danger for world civilization. From the first days of the war, UNESCO and various state and non-governmental organizations of the countries of the world community supported our country in overcoming the destructive consequences of armed conflict regarding cultural heritage. The protection of cultural heritage sites as material evidence of the great history of Ukrainians and an integral part of the world’s cultural heritage has become one of the strategic directions in countering Russian expansion. Various projects and grant programs are being developed for the preservation and restoration of cultural objects, both in the territories controlled by Ukraine and temporarily occupied. At the same time, ideally, Ukraine should use the experience of effective protection of cultural heritage sites by those countries that once faced similar challenges, that is, were influenced by military actions. Ukraine should become the initiator and active participant in creating an effective system for protecting cultural heritage and developing modern mechanisms of international law related to this issue. Today, Ukrainian monument protection services, law enforcement agencies, and non-governmental organizations, in conditions of military confrontation, should strengthen monitoring of the situation in temporarily occupied territories and document crimes against cultural objects to subsequently demand from the Russian aggressor the return and restoration of lost material and non-material values. And this will inevitably happen because Ukraine will win. The prospects for further studies are determined by the relevance of studying mechanisms for accounting for lost cultural heritage sites and developing strategic directions for the preservation and restoration of such sites, taking into account global experience.
References
"Rymskyi Statut Mizhnarodnoho Kryminalnoho Sudu. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
"(2020). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro pryiednannia Ukrainy do Druhoho protokolu do Haazkoi konventsii pro zakhyst kulturnykh tsinnostei u razi zbroinoho konfliktu 1954 r.”. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady. N 39. [in Ukrainian].
"Sysak, I. (2022). “Znyshchennia ukrainskoi kultury ye kliuchovym elementom rosiiskoi ahresii”: pysmennyk Deiv Eggers. Radio Svoboda. 07.12.2022. [in Ukrainian].
"(2022). Cultural Heritage and Mass Atrocities. Ed. by J. Cuno and Th.G. Weiss. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.
"(2018). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro natsionalnu bezpeku Ukrainy”. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady. N 31. [in Ukrainian].
"(1988). Konventsiia pro okhoronu vsesvitnoi kulturnoi i pryrodnoi spadshchyny. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. 04.10.1988. [in Ukrainian].
"(2000). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro okhoronu kulturnoi spadshchyny”. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. N 39. [in Ukrainian].
Akulenko, V. I. (2013). Terminy yak mezhi mizhnarodno-pravovykh poniat “restytutsiia” i “restytutsiia kulturnykh tsinnostei”. Pratsi Tsentru pamiatkoznavstva. Kyiv. 24: 284-295. [in Ukrainian].
Mazur, T. V. (2019). Implementatsiia mizhnarodno-pravovykh norm shchodo zakhystu kulturnykh tsinnostei u vypadku zbroinykh konfliktiv u zakonodavstvo Ukrainy. Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys. Odesa. 4/3: 152-156. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.32850/sulj.2019.4.3.34
Usenko, O. (2009). Formuvannia systemy spetsialnoho zakonodavstva u sferi okhorony kulturnoi spadshchyny. Visnyk prokuratury. 4: 78-84. [in Ukrainian].
Gamboni, D. (2001). World Heritage: Shield or Target? The Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter. Los Angeles. 16/2: 5-11.
Teijgeler, R. (2006). Preserving cultural heritage in times of conflict. Preservation management for libraries, archives and museums. London. 133-165. doi: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049214.010
Milligan, A. (2008). Targeting Cultural Property: The Role of International Law. Journal of Public and International Affairs. 19. 5: 91-106.
Kot, S. (2020). Povernennia i restytutsiia kulturnykh tsinnostei u politychnomu ta kulturnomu zhytti Ukrainy (XX — poch. XXI st.). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
(2016). Zi shchytom chy na shchyti?: Zakhyst kulturnykh tsinnostei v umovakh zbroinoho konfliktu na skhodi Ukrainy. Ed. A.P. Bushchenko. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
(2022). Panelna dyskusiia “Viina Rosii proty Ukrainy 2014-2022 rr.: istorychna retrospektyva i sproby naukovoi refleksii” (19-20 travnia 2022 r.). Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal. 4: 4-54. [in Ukrainian].
(2022). Perelom: Viina Rosii proty Ukrainy u chasovykh plastakh i prostorakh mynuvshyny: Dialohy z istorykamy. U 3 kh. Kyiv. Kn. 1. [in Ukrainian].
(2023). Kulturna spadshchyna ta natsionalna bezpeka: analitychna dopovid. V. Potapenko, Yu. Tyshchenko, Yu. Kaplan; ed. V. Potapenko. Kyiv: NISD. [in Ukrainian].
Tarasenko, N. (2023). Viina z Rosiieiu: vtraty i ryzyky dlia kulturnoi spadshchyny Ukrainy. Shliakhy rozvytku ukrainskoi nauky: suspilnyi dyskurs. 9 (91): 7-25. [in Ukrainian].
"Chernyshuk, P. Muzei ta nematerialna kulturna spadshchyna Ukrainy pid prytsilom: vidbulasia prezentatsiia zvitu. Yurydychna hazeta online. [in Ukrainian].
"Kulturna spadshchyna Ukrainy pid chas viiny: posylennia holosiv ukrainskykh ekspertiv. Ukraine crisis media center. [in Ukrainian].
(2016). Kulturni tsinnosti Krymu i Donbasu v umovakh viiny ta okupatsii. Materialy Kruhloho stolu “Istoryko-kulturnyi ta naukovyi potentsial Pivdnia ta Skhodu Ukrainy v umovakh okupatsii ta voiennykh dii: zahrozy, vtraty, perspektyvy zberezhennia ta vidnovlennia”; m. Kyiv, 12 lystopada 2015 r. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
(2023). Krym — tse Ukraina: stratehiia deokupatsii ta reintehratsii. Materialy Mizhnarodnoho naukovo-praktychnoho kruhloho stolu (m. Odesa, 24 liutoho 2023 roku). Odesa. [in Ukrainian].
Yurko, S., Mykolenko, V., Khaliavka, Yu. (2022). Zasoby vidshkoduvannia shkody kulturno-istorychnii spadshchyni Ukrainy vnaslidok rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny. Materialy V Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii “Kulturno-istorychna spadshchyna Ukrainy: perspektyvy doslidzhennia ta tradytsii zberezhennia” (z mizhnarodnoiu uchastiu) (m. Cherkasy, ChDTU, 20-21 zhovtnia 2022 r.). Cherkasy. 21-24. [in Ukrainian].
Ivanova, N., Pestretsova, O. (2022). Pravovi aspekty zberezhennia kulturnoi spadshchyny v umovakh viiny. Naukovi pratsi Natsionalnoi biblioteky Ukrainy imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. 64: 28-42. [in Ukrainian].
Mazur, T. V. (2019). Implementatsiia mizhnarodno-pravovykh norm shchodo zakhystu kulturnykh tsinnostei u vypadku zbroinykh konfliktiv u zakonodavstvo Ukrainy. Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys. 4/3: 152-156. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.32850/sulj.2019.4.3.34
Novosad, M., Bilous, S., Tereshkun, O., Borysevych, L. (2022). Ruinuvannia kulturnoi spadshchyny Ukrainy v umovakh viiny yak problema: filosofsko-kulturolohichnyi aspekt. Osvitnii dyskurs. 39 (1-3): 62-76. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.39(1-3)-5
Kryvolapov, B. (2022). Zakhyst kulturnykh tsinnostei v umovakh ahresii Rosiiskoi Federatsii. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka: Mizhnarodni vidnosyny. 2 (56): 100-102. [in Ukrainian].
Sklenar, I. (2023). Znyshchennia muzeinoi spadshchyny rosiiskym ahresorom u 2022 rotsi: za materialamy mas-media. Ukrainskyi informatsiinyi prostir. 1 (11): 72-88. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7948.1(11).2023.279571
Rishniak, O. (2022). Kulturna spadshchyna u voiennomu konflikti: mizhnarodnyi dosvid druhoi polovyny XX — pochatku XXI st. ta ukrainska diisnist. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal. 4: 159-173. [in Ukrainian].
Narozhna, O. V. (2023). Do pytannia rozsliduvannia poshkodzhennia obiektiv kulturnoi spadshchyny v umovakh viiny. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu: Seriia Pravo. 2. 78: 282-286. [in Ukrainian].
Skus, O., Dzhahunova, O. (2024). Istoryko-kulturna spadshchyna Ukrainy v umovakh ekzystentsiinoho vyklyku. Naukovi zapysky VDPU imeni Mykhaila Kotsiubynskoho: Seriia Istoriia. 47: 99-108. [in Ukrainian].
Chernets, V., Dodonov, R. (2023). Zakhyst kulturnoi spadshchyny v umovakh povnomasshtabnoi rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny: uroky i perspektyvy. Visnyk NDIU. 1: 47-61. [in Ukrainian].
Kuznetsova, L. (2023). Muzei Ukrainy v umovakh rosiiskoi zbroinoi ahresii. Pytannia kulturolohii. 42: 182-194. [in Ukrainian].
Kot, S. I. (2016). Problemy zakhystu kulturnykh tsinnostei na okupovanykh terytoriiakh Krymu ta m. Sevastopolia. Kulturni tsinnosti Krymu i Donbasu v umovakh viiny ta okupatsii: Materialy kruhloho stolu “Istoryko-kulturnyi ta naukovyi potentsial Pivdnia ta Skhodu Ukrainy v umovakh okupatsii ta voiennykh dii: zahrozy, vtraty, perspektyvy zberezhennia ta vidnovlennia”; m. Kyiv, 12 lystopada 2015 r. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. 7-24. [in Ukrainian].
"(2014). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro zabezpechennia prav i svobod hromadian ta pravovyi rezhym na tymchasovo okupovanii terytorii Ukrainy”. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. N 26. [in Ukrainian].
Kot, S. (2015). Sud shchodo “skifskoho zolota”: Shansy storin na tli mizhnarodnoho prava. Ukrainska pravda. 06.04.2015. [in Ukrainian].
Strokova, L. V. (2016). Tak zvane “skifske zoloto” z krymskykh muzeiv: problema povernennia kulturnykh tsinnostei Ukrainy z Niderlandiv. Kulturni tsinnosti Krymu i Donbasu v umovakh viiny ta okupatsii: Materialy kruhloho stolu “Istoryko-kulturnyi ta naukovyi potentsial Pivdnia ta Skhodu Ukrainy v umovakh okupatsii ta voiennykh dii: zahrozy, vtraty, perspektyvy zberezhennia ta vidnovlennia”; m. Kyiv, 12 lystopada 2015 r. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. 39-44. [in Ukrainian].
"(2023). Skifske zoloto povernuly v Ukrainu. De yoho zberihatymut. BBS News Ukraina. 28.11.2023. [in Ukrainian].
Kot, S. (2020). Povernennia i restytutsiia kulturnykh tsinnostei u politychnomu ta kulturnomu zhytti Ukrainy (XX — poch. XXI st.). Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
"(2024). Na terytorii Khersonesa okupanty zvodiat novyi amfiteatr. Ukrinform. 17.04.2024. [in Ukrainian].
"(2015). Kirilenko odernul Putina. Minprom. 02.08.2015. [in Russian].
"Yashnyi, D., Ablialimova-Chyihoz, E. Povnomasshtabna ahresiia RF proty Ukrainy 2022. Kulturna spadshchyna. Krymskyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen. [in Ukrainian].
"Podoloiak, K. (2024). Pidrobka, a ne restavratsiia. Chomu krymchany ne vpiznaiut Khanskyi palats v Bakhchysarai. Krym. Realii. 27.06.2024. [in Ukrainian].
"Skollon, M. (2021). Vid skifi v do hotiv: Rosiia-“maroder” bahatiie, rozkopuiuchy krymski arkheolohichni pamiatky. Radio Svoboda. 05.07.2021. [in Ukrainian].
"Dudka, N. (2024). Okupanty vidnovliat nezakonni rozkopky u Kyz-Auli — Krymskotatarskyi Resursnyi Tsentr. Suspilne Krym. 07.10.2024. [in Ukrainian].
"(2016). Z okupovanoho Krymu v Moskvu perevezly 38 kartyn Aivazovskoho. Hlavkom. 12.07.2016. [in Ukrainian].
Tytova, O. M. (2016). Kulturna spadshchyna Krymu ta Donbasu za suchasnykh umov: zahrozy, vtraty, perspektyvy zberezhennia. Kulturni tsinnosti Krymu i Donbasu v umovakh viiny ta okupatsii: Materialy kruhloho stolu “Istoryko-kulturnyi ta naukovyi potentsial Pivdnia ta Skhodu Ukrainy v umovakh okupatsii ta voiennykh dii: zahrozy, vtraty, perspektyvy zberezhennia ta vidnovlennia”; m. Kyiv, 12 lystopada 2015 r. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. 25-32. [in Ukrainian].
(2024). Zruinovano holovnyi muzei istorii Donechchyny. Istorychna pravda. 17.04.2024. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202403Statyi03
"Pohuliaievskyi, M. Zvychainyi donetskyi kontstabir: Yak tsentr suchasnoho mystetstva “Izoliatsiia” peretvoryvsia na kativniu. Zaxid.Net. 13.05.2021. [in Ukrainian].
"Savchenko, Ya., Korotkyi, T. (2022). Zlochyny proty kultury: shcho kazhe mizhnarodne parvo pro vidpovidalnist Rosii za znyshchenu spadshchynu? LB.ua. Doroslyi pohliad na svit. 22.07.2022. [in Ukrainian].
"IV Konventsiia pro zakony i zvychai viiny na sukhodoli ta dodatok do nei: Polozhennia pro zakony i zvychai viiny na sukhodoli. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
"(2025). V Ukraini cherez rosiisku ahresiiu poshkodzheni 1 tysiacha 333 pamiatky kulturnoi spadshchyny. Ukrinform. 01.02.2025. [in Ukrainian].
"Dubrovenko, A. Dva roky viiny — yaki zbytky Ukrainy vid vtorhnennia RF ta reitynh naibilsh postrazhdalykh oblastei. Novyny Live. 24.02.2024. [in Ukrainian].
"(2024). Skilky koshtiv znadobytsia Ukraini dlia vidnovlennia kultury y turyzmu: pidrakhunok YuNESKO. TSN. 09.03.2024. [in Ukrainian].
"Pasikovska-Shnass, M. (2022). Viina Rosii proty kulturnoi spadshchyny Ukrainy. Doslidnytska sluzhba Yevropeiskoho parlamentu. 01.04.2022. [in Ukrainian].
"Denysiaka, O. (2022). Okupanty spalyly muzei z robotamy Marii Pryimachenko. Lvivskyi portal. 28.02.2022. [in Ukrainian].
"Vodianyi, A. Rosiia vykrala skifske zoloto z muzeiu v okupovanomu Melitopoli. Ligza.net. 11.05.2022. [in Ukrainian].
"(2024). Khersonskyi khudozhnii muzei identyfikuvav shche odnu vykradenu rosiianamy kartynu. Ukrinform. 17.09.2024. [in Uk rainian].
"Hospodarenko, O. (2023). Pryvlasnennia kulturnoi spadshchyny Ukrainy: yak rosiiany peretvoryly Kamianu Mohylu na viiskovyi trofei. Novynarnia: Novyny Ukrainy shcho voiuie. 15.12.2023. [in Ukrainian].
"Yakobchuk, A. (2025). V Ukraini cherez viinu poshkodzheno shchonaimenshe 613 kultovykh budivel. Slovo pro slovo. 04.01.2025. [in Ukrainian].
"(2023). My pamiataiemo: Znyshchenyi rosiiskymy okupantamy islamskyi kulturnyi tsentr v Sievierodonetsku. Sievierodonetska viiskova administratsiia Sievierodonetskoho raionu Luhanskoi oblasti: Ofitsiinyi veb-sait. 26.07.2023. [in Ukrainian].
"(2024). Yakykh zbytkiv kulturnii spadshchyni Ukrainy zavdala rosiiska ahresiia. Finance. UA. 24.02.2024. [in Ukrainian].
"Karlovskyi, D. (2022). Okupanty na zakhoplenykh terytoriiakh boriutsia z pidruchnykamy istorii, Stusom i Banderoiu. Ukrainska pravda. 24.03.2022. [in Ukrainian].
"Mykhailova, O. Yu. Pamiatnyky Ukrainy, zruinovani ta poshkodzheni okupantamy u perebihu rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny. [in Ukrainian].
"(2023). Dolia kulturnykh pamiatok Khersonshchyny: bezpovorotno znyshcheni, peremishcheni vodoiu ta ponyshcheni eroziieiu. Radio Kultura. 08.06.2023. [in Ukrainian].
"Trying individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression. International Criminal Court.
"Dzhaparova, E. (2023). Vykonavcha rada YuNESKO pidtrymala rishennia shchodo prodovzhennia nadzvychainoi dopomohy Ukraini. Uriadovyi portal. 22.05.2023. [in Ukrainian].
"Kramar, R. (2022). Polski muzeinyky dopomahaiut muzeiam v Ukraini. Culture.Pl. 08.06.2022. [in Ukrainian].
"(2024). Krainy Liublinskoho trykutnyka pochaly spivpratsiu z otsyfruvannia kulturnoi spadshchyny Ukrainy. Ukrinform. 06.04.2024. [in Ukrainian].
"(2023). Amerykanski ta polski orhanizatsii dopomahaiut riatuvaty ukrainsku kulturnu spadshchynu. Radio Svoboda. 23.02.2023. [in Ukrainian].
"(2023). U Paryzhi prezentuvaly proiekt pro ruinuvannia kulturnoi spadshchyny Ukrainy v umovakh viiny. Bukvy. 14.12.2023. [in Ukrainian].
"(2023). Minkult i NAZK pochynaiut poshuky vykradenykh z Ukrainy pid chas viiny predmetiv mystetstva. Radio Svoboda. 02.02.2023. [in Ukrainian].


