"Great Turns" of Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge in the History of Historiography of the 20th Century: Ukrainian Projection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2018.05.107Keywords:
neo-kantianism, sociologization history, phenomenology, neoromanticism, anthropological turn, linguistic turn, “great turns”, Ukrainian historiography 20th century.Abstract
This article lightens up the symbolic transformations of socio-humanitarian knowledge of the 20th century, metaphorically described as “great turns” – neokantianism, sociologization history, phenomenology, anthropological and linguistic turns. Author considered the perception, assimilation and adaptation of the cardinal metamorphosis of knowledge in research practices and conceptual offers of Ukrainian historians. Also, it is noted that the spread of such terminological innovations associated with the growing Westernization of the scientific language, in particular, in the fields of sociohumanitaristics of the second half of the 20th century. The thought is expound that the usege of the term “turn” for designing and representing of the history of history writing generates both certain possibilities and instrumental problems, in particular, requires a ranking, at least the ratio of different “turns”. Author noted that each of the “great turns” caused important changes in the historian’s thinking, such as initiating the assimilation and adaptation of other conceptual proposals, cognitive patterns, research strategies and instruments. In addition, in the article noted that the existence of neo-romanticism in the Ukrainian historiography of the 20th century is associated with traumatic heritage and diverse, long-term attempts to comprehend and bind it.
References
Bilas, L. (1961). Ideolohiia iak istoriia i iak poeziia (Z pryvodu dvokh novykh prats’ O.Ohloblyna). Suchasnist’, (7), 44–62. [in Ukrainian].
Bilas, L.R. (1980). Krakiv, Zheneva i filiiatsiia «Krychevs’koho»: Do rodovidnoi myslennia V.Lypyns’koho. In L.R.Bilas (ed.), Lypyns’kyi, V. Tvory (vol.2, pp.XVII–XCVIII). Filadel’fiia: Skhidno-Yevropeis’kyi doslidnyi instytut im. V.K.Lypyns’koho. [in Ukrainian].
Bilas, L.R. (1985). The Intellectual Development of V.Lypyns’kyj: His World View and Political Activity before World War I. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 9 (3/4), 263–286.
Burrow, J. (2008). A History of Histories. Epics, Chronicles, Romances and Inquiries from Herodotus and Thucydides to the Twentieth Century. New York: Published in the U.S. by Alfred A. Knopf, a division of Random House, Inc.
Cherchenko, Yu. (2012). Lystuvannia Bohdana Kentrzhyns’koho z Dmytrom Doroshenkom, Borysom Krupnyts’kym, Volodymyrom Kubiiovychem i Volodymyrom Yanevym. Ukrains’kyi arkheohrafichnyi shchorichnyk: Nova seriia, 19/20 (16/17), 545– 569. [in Ukrainian].
Dashkevych, Ya. (1999). Postmodernizm ta ukrains’ka istorychna nauka. Ukrains’ki problemy, (1/2), 109–119. [in Ukrainian].
Depenchuk, L. (1995). Bohdan Kistiakivs’kyi. Kyiv: Osnovy. [in Ukrainian].
Domans’ka, E. (2012). Istoriia ta suchasna humanitarystyka: doslidzhennia z teorii znannia pro mynule (V.Sklokin, transl.). Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. [in Ukrainian].
Dzhokhadze, I.D. (2001). Neopragmatizm Richarda Rorti. Moskva. [in Russian].
Fizer, I. (1999). Ukrains’kyi Fuko chy frantsuz’kyi Petrov? Raziucha skhozhist’ dvokh istoriosofiv. Naukovi zapysky Natsional’noho universytetu «Kyievo-Mohylians’ka akademiia», (17), 42–44. [in Ukrainian].
Gusserl’, E. (2004). Krizis evropejskikh nauk i transcendental’naya fenomenologiya. Vvedenie v fenomenologicheskuyu filosofiyu (D.V.Sklyadnev, transl.). Sankt-Peterburg. [in Russian].
Holovko, V. (2003). Istoriohrafiia kryzy istorychnoi nauky: Ukrains’kyi kontekst. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
Isaievych, Ya. (2002). Lev Bilas i yoho istoriohrafichni pratsi / Bilas, L. (2002). Kryza nashoho obrazu istorii. L’viv: Instytut ukrainoznavstva im. I.Krypiakevycha NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
Isajiw, W. (1985). The Political Sociology of Vjačeslav Lypyns’kyj. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 9 (3/4), 287–301.
Khabermas, Yu. (2008). Filosofskij diskurs o moderne. Dvenadtsat’ lektsij. (M.M.Belyaev, K.V.Kostin, E.L.Petrenko, I.V.Rozanov, G.M.Severskaya, transl.). Moskva. [in Russian].
Khobsbaum, E. (2004). Epokha krajnostej: Korotkij dvadtsatyj vek (1914–1991). (E.M.Naryshkina, A.V.Nikol’s’kaya, transl.). Moskva. [in Russian].
Kolinhvud, R.Dzh. (1996). Ideia istorii. Z lektsiiamy 1926–1928 rr. (O.Mokrovol’s’kyi, transl.). Kyiv: Osnovy. [in Ukrainian].
Kolesnyk, I. (2013). Ukrains’ka istoriohrafiia: kontseptual’na istoriia. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
Lukov, V.A. (2009). Francuzskij neoromantizm. Moskva. [in Russian].
Lysiak-Rudnyts’kyi, I. (1994). V oboroni intelektu. In F.Sysyn (ed.), Lysiak- Rudnyts’kyi, I. Istorychni ese (vol.2, pp.381–407). Kyiv: Osnovy. [in Ukrainian].
Lysiak-Rudnyts’kyi, I. (1994). Viacheslav Lypyns’kyi. In F.Sysyn (ed.), Lysiak- Rudnyts’kyi, I. Istorychni ese (vol.2, pp.131–148). Kyiv: Osnovy. [in Ukrainian].
Mankhejm, K. (2000). Sotsiologiya kul’tury: Izbrannoe (L.F.Vol’fson, A.B.Dranov, transl.). Moskva; Sankt-Peterburg. [in Russian].
Matiash, I.B. (2002). Osoba v ukrains’kii arkhivistytsi: Biohrafichni narysy. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Medushevskaya, O.M. (1999). Fenomenologiya kul’tury: kontseptsiya A.S.Lappo-Danilevskogo v gumanitarnom poznanii novejshego vremeni. Istoricheskie zapiski, (120), 100–136. [in Russian].
Pareto, V. (2008). Kompendium po obshchej sotsiologii (A.A.Zotova, transl.). Moskva. [in Russian].
Pidhaiets’kyi, V. (2000). Modernizm i postmodernizm: uiavne mynule chy invariantne maibutnie? Ukraina moderna, (4/5), 289–318. [in Ukrainian].
Polons’ka-Vasylenko, N. (1971). Ukrains’ka istoriohrafiia. Miunkhen: Ukrains’kyi Vil’nyi Universytet. [in Ukrainian].
Pritsak, O. (1991). Istoriosofiia ta istoriohrafiia Mykhaila Hrushevs’koho. Kyiv; Kembrydzh. [in Ukrainian].
Pritsak, O. (1985). Lypyns’kyj’s Place in Ukrainian Intellectual History. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 9 (3/4), 245–262.
Pritsak, O. (1981). Problems of Terminology and Periodization in the Teaching of Ukrainian History. Round Table Discussion at the Ukrainian Historical Conference. London, Ontario, 31 May 1978. Rethinking Ukrainian History. (pp.234–236). Edmonton.
Rorti, R. (1996). Sluchajnost’, ironiya i solidarnost’. (I.Khestanov, R.Khestanova, transl.). Moskva. [in Russian].
Rumyanceva, M.F. (2007). Kontsept «priznanie chuzhoj odushevlennosti» v russkoj versii neokantianstva. Cogito: Al’manakh istorii idej, (2), 35–54. [in Russian].
Ševčenko, I. (1969). Two Varieties of Historical Writing. History and Theory, 8 (3), 332–345. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504140
Shlemkevych, M. (1971). 1917–20 roky i ukrains’ke suspil’stvo. Suchasnist’, (5), 87– 99. [in Ukrainian].
Sinitsyn, O.V. (2000). Neokantianskaya metodologiya istorii i razvitie istoricheskoj mysli v Rossii v kontse XIX – nachale XX vv. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kazan’. [in Russian].
Sklokin, V. (2009). Franklin Ankersmit – teoretyk ryzykovanoi istoriohrafii. Ukraina moderna, (15), 237–245. [in Ukrainian].
Sorokin, P.A. (1992). Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo. Moskva. [in Russian].
Stel’makh, S.P. (1997). Istorychna dumka v Ukraini XIX – pochatku XX st. Kyiv: Akademiia. [in Ukrainian].
Subtel’nyi, O. (1979). Oleksander Ohloblyn. Suchasnist’, (12), 34–42. [in Ukrainian].
Subtelny, O. (1993). The Current State of Ukrainian Historiography. Journal of Ukrainian Studies, 18 (1/2), 33–54.
Trel’ch, E. (1994). Istorizm i ego problemy. Logicheskaya problema filosofii istorii. (M.I.Levin, S.D.Skazkin, transl.). Moskva. [in Russian].
Tugan-Baranovskij, M.I. (2003). Teoreticheskie osnovy marksizma. Moskva. [in Russian].
Valiavko, I.V. (2004). Do intelektual’noi biohrafii Dmytra Chyzhevs’koho: praz’kyi period (1924–1932). Naukovi zapysky Natsional’noho universytetu «Kyievo-Mohylians’ka akademiia», (25), 83–88. [in Ukrainian].
Vashchenko, V.V. (2007). Vid samoprezentatsii do metodolohii: psykhobioistoriohrafichnyi vymir prostoru istoriopysannia M.Hrushevs’koho. Dnipropetrovs’k: Dnipropetrovs’kyi natsional’nyi universytet. [in Ukrainian].
Vul’f, K. (2008). Antropologiya: Istoriya, kul’tura, filosofiya (G.Khajdarova, transl.). Sankt-Peterburg. [in Russian].
Windschuttle, K. (1996). The Killing of History: How Literary Critics and Social Theorists Are Murdering Our Past. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
Yakovenko, N. (2007). Vstup do istorii. Kyiv: Krytyka. [in Ukrainian].
"Zazuliak, Yu. (2017). Chas istoriohrafii. [in Ukrainian].
