THE EFFECT OF ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE INHIBITORS AND THEIR COMBINATION WITH SPERMINE ON THE PROFILE OF POLYAMINES IN HUMAN PROSTATE CANCER CELL LINES

Authors

  • O.O. Klenov R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Yu.V. Yanish R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • І.О. Sumnikova R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/oncology.2025.01.044

Keywords:

поліаміни, спермін, госсипол, дисульфірам, клітинні лінії раку передміху- рової залози людини

Abstract

Summary. Aim: to investigate the effect of aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors, spermine (Spn) and their complex effect on the polyamine profile in human prostate cancer (PCa) cell lines and to compare changes in the polyamine profile with tumor cell survival. Object and methods: the study was conducted on cell cultures of androgen-sensitive (LNCaP) and androgen-resistant (DU-145) cell lines. The profile of polyamines in tumor cells was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results: the addition of Spn to the culture medium caused a significant accumulation of this polyamine in the cells. The use of aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors (gossypol and disulfiram) was accompanied by a decrease in the level of spermidine (Spd). Incubation of cells with Spn led to a decrease in the proliferation rate — the molar ratio Spd/Spn. Especially low values of the Spd/Spn ratio were observed when Spn was used in combination with aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors. When Spn was used in combination with aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors, cell survival rates were also the lowest. This indicated a more effective inhibition of cell growth with the combined use of these factors compared to their use separately, even in much higher concentrations. Conclusions: the use of aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors alone and in combination with Spn causes changes in the profile of polyamines in tumor cells characteristic of growth inhibition and a decrease in the molar ratio of Spd/Spn. These changes are more pronounced when these factors are used together and are accompanied by a decrease in the survival of androgen-sensitive (LNCaP) and androgen-resistant (DU-145) human prostate cancer cell lines. At the same time, the use of aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors together with Spn more effectively reduced the survival of androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells of human prostate compared to androgen-resistant DU-145 cells. The results obtained indicate the prospects for further study of SPN and its combinations with aldehyde hydrogenase inhibitors as potential treatment agents for PCa.

References

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71 (3): 209–49. https://doi.org/ 10.3322/caac.21660.

American Cancer Society: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/ types/prostate-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival- rates.html.

Kim JY, Cho Y, Oh E, et al. Disulfiram targets cancer stem- like properties and the HER2/Akt signaling pathway in HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Lett 2016; 379 (1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2016.05.026.

Randel RD, Chase CC, Wyse SJ. Effects of Gossy 01 and cottonseed products on reproduction of mammals. J Anim Sci 1992; 70 (5): 1628–38. https://doi.org/10.2527/ 1992.7051628x.

Schroeder JP, Cooper DA, Schank JR, et al. Disulfiram at- tenuates drug-primed reinstatement of cocaine seeking via inhibition of dopamine β-hydroxylase. Neuropsychophar- macology 2010; 35 (12): 2440–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ npp.2010.127.

Xu R, Tian E, Tang H, et al. Proteomic analysis of gossypol induces necrosis in multiple myeloma cells. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 839232. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/ 839232.

Hsiao W-T, Tsai M-D, Jow G-M, et al. Involvement of Smac, p53, and caspase pathways in induction of apoptosis by gossypol in human retinoblastoma cells. Mol Vis 2012; 18: 2033–42.

Mohammad RM, Wang S, Aboukameel A, et al. Preclini- cal studies of a nonpeptidic small-molecule inhibitor of Bcl-2 and Bcl-X(L) (-)-gossypol against diffuse large cell lymphoma. Mol Cancer 2005; 4 (1): 13–21. https://doi. org/10.1158/1535-7163.13.4.1.

Wang B, Chen L, Ni Z, et al. Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG sen- sitizes Bcl-2 inhibitor (-)-gossypol by suppressing ERK- mediated protective autophagy and Mcl-1 accumulation in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res 2014; 328 (2): 379–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.08.039

Zerp SF, Stoter TR, Hoebers FJP, et al. Targeting anti- apoptotic Bcl-2 by AT-101 to increase radiation efficacy: Data from in vitro and clinical pharmacokinetic studies in head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10: 158. https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0474-9.

Zhang M, Liu H, Guo R, et al. Molecular mechanism of gossypol-induced cell growth inhibition and cell death of HT-29 human colon carcinoma cells. Biochem Pharmacol 2003; 66 (1): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-2952- (03)00248-x.

Cao S, Wang G, Ge F, et al. Gossypol inhibits 5α-reductase 1 and 3α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: its possible use for the treatment of prostate cancer. Fitoterapia 2019; 133: 102–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2018.12. 024.

Frazier KR, Moore JA, Long TE. Antibacterial activity of disulfi and its metabolites. J Appl Microbiol 2019; 126 (1): 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14094.

Ekinci E, Rohondia S, Khan R, Dou QP. Repurposing disul- firam as an anti-cancer agent: Updated review on literature and patents. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 2019; 14 (2): 113–32. https://doi.org/10.2174/157489281466619051 4104035.

Sun Y, Lu Y, Saredy J, et al. ROS systems are a new in- tegrated network for sensing homeostasis and alarming stresses in organelle metabolic processes. Redox Biol 2020; 37: 101696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.10 1696.

Guo F, Yang Z, Sehouli J, Kaufmann AM. Blockade of ALDH in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer stem cells in vitro syn- ergistically enhances chemotherapy-induced cell death. Curr Oncol 2022; 29 (4): 2808–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ curroncol29040229.

Lu C, Li X, Ren Y, Zhang X. Disulfiram: A novel repurposed drug for cancer therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021; 87 (2): 159–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-020- 04216-8.

O’Brien SP, Xi Y, Miller JR, et al. Disulfiram (Antabuse) activates ROS-dependent ER stress and apoptosis in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Med 2019; 8 (5): 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050611.

DengW, Yang Z, Yue H, et al. Disulfiram suppresses NLRP3 infl ome activation to treat peritoneal and gouty in- flammation. Free Radic Biol Med 2020; 152: 8–17. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.03.007.

Hu H, Cui L, Lu J, et al. Intestinal microbiota regulates anti-tumor effect of disulfiram combined with Cu in a mice model. Cancer Med 2020; 9 (18): 6791–801. https://doi. org/10.1002/cam4.3346.

Wang R, Shen J, Yan H, et al. The evolving role of disulfiram in radiobiology and the treatment of breast cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2020; 13: 10441–6. https://doi.org/10.2147/ OTT.S271532.

Wu X, Xue X, Wang L, et al. Suppressing autophagy enhances disulfiram/copper-induced apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018; 15: 827–31 https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.02.039.

Yoshino H, Yamada Y, Enokida H, et al. Targeting NPL4 via drug repositioning using disulfiram for the treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2020; 15 (7): e0236119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236119.

Iljin K, Ketola K, Vainio P, et al. High-throughput cell- based screening of 4910 known drugs and drug-like small molecules identifies disulfiram as an inhibitor of prostate cancer cell growth. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15 (19): 6070–8. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1035.

Campos-Fernández E, Barcelos LS, De Souza AG, et al. Research landscape of liquid biopsies in prostate cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2019; 9: 1309–28.

Cooperberg MR, Simko JP, Cowan JE, et al. Validation of a cell-cycle progression gene panel to improve risk stratification in a contemporary prostatectomy cohort. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 1428–34. https://doi.org/10.1200/ JCO.2012.46.4396.

Hoffman RM. Clinical practice. Screening for prostate can- cer. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (21): 2013–9. https://doi. org/10.1056/NEJMcp1103642.

Alexander ET, Minton A, Peters MC, et al. A novel polyamine blockade therapy activates an anti-tumor immune response. Oncotarget 2017; 8 (48): 84140–52. https://doi.org/10. 18632/oncotarget.20493.

Soda K. The mechanisms by which polyamines accelerate tumor spread. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2011; 30 (1): 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-30-95.

Murray-Stewart TR, Woster PM, Casero RA Jr. Target- ing polyamine metabolism for cancer therapy and pre- vention. Biochem J 2016; 473 (19): 2937–53. https://doi. org/10.1042/BCJ20160383.

Gerbaut L. Determination of erythrocytic polyamines by reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Clin Chem 1991; 37: 2117–20.

Zaletok SP, Klenov OO, Bentrad VV, et al. Polyamines as new potential biomarkers for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and estimation of its aggressiveness. Exp Oncol 2022; 44 (2): 148–54. https://doi.org/10.32471/ exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-44-no-2.17758.

Lakin GF. Biometrics. M: Higher School, 1990. 352 p.

Published

2025-07-02

How to Cite

Klenov, O., Yanish, Y., & Sumnikova І. (2025). THE EFFECT OF ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE INHIBITORS AND THEIR COMBINATION WITH SPERMINE ON THE PROFILE OF POLYAMINES IN HUMAN PROSTATE CANCER CELL LINES. Oncology, 27(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.15407/oncology.2025.01.044

Issue

Section

Original investigations