Peasant Self-Government in the Right-Bank Ukraine in the Second Half of the Nineteenth – Early Twentieth Centuries: the Personnel Formation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2021.03.028

Keywords:

peasant self-government, peasant reform, volost, rural community, peasant community, conciliator (myrovyi poserednyk), Right-Bank Ukraine

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to reveal the process of formation of personnel of peasant administrations in the provinces of the Right-Bank Ukraine in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries, to trace the characteristic features of the selection of persons for various positions in the peasant self-government, to create typological portraits of the main leading and hired officials of the peasant administrations.

The research methodology includes a number of methods of cognition, namely the method of history (allowed to trace the progress in the formation and functioning of peasant self-government to protect socio-cultural and political changes in the empire of the 19th – early 20th centuries), method of factor analysis (contributed to the tracing of local specific features in the establishment and operation of peasant administrations).

Scientific novelty. Collective portraits of employees of peasant self-government bodies were created on the basis of various sources and historiographical research. Due to a comprehensive analysis of sources, generalized patterns and specifics of peasant self-government.

Conclusions. Peasant selfgovernment, introduced by the “Regulations on the Exodus of Peasants from Serfdom” in 1861, worked on two levels – volosty (association of several peasant communities, or one large village) and rural (peasant communities, consisting of several villages or one large village). The newly created peasant administrations: volosty and villages authorities, courts and assemblies (councils) were formed from members of peasant communities. Mostly of the administrations were occupied by peasants (rarely burghers), Ukrainians of the Orthodox faith. Preference in the selection of personnel to give persons literate, with a decent reputation, personal economic prosperity.

References

Bezgin, V. (2012). Volostnoj sud selskoj Rossii (vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XX v.). Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem, 12 (20). [in Russian].

Bodnarevskyi, A. (1961). Volosne upravlinnia ta stanovyshche selian na Ukraini pislia reformy 1861 r. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Bovua, D. (2011). Gordiev uzel Rossijskoj imperii: Vlast, shlyakhta i narod na Pravoberezhnoj Ukraine (1793–1914). Moskva. [in Russian].

Fedkov, O., Mahas, V. (2011). “Selianstvu – vladu i zemliu!”: Vserosiiskyi selianskyi soiuz v Ukraini (1905–1907 rr.). Kamianets-Podilskyi. [in Ukrainian].

Gorizontov, L. (1999). Paradoksy imperskoj politiki: polyaki v Rossii i russkie v Polshe. Moskva. [in Russian].

Hlushkovetskyi, A. (2010). Demokratiia v provintsii: vybory ta diialnist deputativ Podilskoi hubernii u Derzhavnykh Dumakh Rosiiskoi imperii. Kamianets-Podilskyi. [in Ukrainian].

Ivanova, N., Zheltova, V. (2010). Soslovnoe obshchestvo Rossijskoj imperii. Sankt-Peterburg. [in Russian].

Kasian, A. (2016). Status ta povnovazhennia volosnykh posadovtsiv na Pravoberezhzhi (druha polovyna XX st.). Hrani, 4, 119–123. [in Ukrainian].

Kasian, A. (2018). Volosne upravlinnia na Pravoberezhnii Ukraini (1861–1917) (Candidate’s thesis). Cherkasy, 2018.

Kolesnyk, V. (2008). Memuary Tadeusha Bobrovskoho (1829–1894) yak dzherelo z istorii Pravoberezhnoi Ukrainy. Podilska starovyna, 4, 206–242. [in Ukrainian].

Kovalova, N. (2016). Seliany, pomishchyky i derzhava: konflikty interesiv. «Ahrarna revoliutsiia» v Ukraini 1902–1922 rr. Dnipropetrovsk. [in Ukrainian].

Lapin, V. (2019). Armiya Rossii kak imperskij integratsionnyj mekhanizm. Peterburgskij istoricheskij zhurnal, 1, 302–313. [in Russian].

Matsuzato, K. (2003). Iz komissarov antipolonizma v prosvetiteli derevni: mirovye posredniki na Pravoberezhnoj Ukraine (1861–1917 gg.). Ukrainskyi humanitarnyi ohliad, 9, 62–121. [in Russian].

Melnychuk, O. (2001). Administratyvnyi aparat ta orhany mistsevoho samovriaduvannia na Podilli u druhii polovyni XIX st. Vinnytsia. [in Ukrainian].

Mykhailiuk, O. (2007). Selianstvo Ukrainy v pershi desiatylittia XIX st.: Sotsiokulturni protsesy. Dnipropetrovsk. [in Ukrainian].

Mykhailiuk, O. (2018). Koruptsiia v selianskomu seredovyshchi kintsia XIX – pochatku XX st. Pytannia ahrarnoi istorii Ukrainy: Mat. dvanadtsiatykh naukovykh chytan, prysviachenykh pamiati D. P. Poidy, 30–39. [in Ukrainian].

Pojda, D. (1960). Krestyanskoe dvizhenie na Pravoberezhnoj Ukraine v poreformennyj period (1866–1900 gg.). Dnepropetrovsk. [in Russian].

Polish, V. (2014). Dvorianstvo Podillia pid chas provedennia reformy 1861 r. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho linhvistychnoho universytetu. Seriia “Psykholohiia ta pedahohika”, 19, 38–43. [in Ukrainian].

Polishchuk, Yu. (2012). Natsionalni menshyny Pravoberezhzhia Ukrainy u konteksti etnichnoi polityky Rosiiskoi imperii (kinets XVIII – pochatok XX st.). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Prysiazhniuk, Yu. (2007). Ukrainske selianstvo Naddniprianskoi Ukrainy: sotsiomentalna istoriia druhoi polovyny XIX – pochatku XX st. Cherkasy. [in Ukrainian].

Prysiazhniuk, Yu., Kasian, A. (2014). Volosnyi ustrii Pravoberezhnoi Ukrainy v poreformenyi period (na materialakh statystyky ta opysiv 1880–1890-kh rr.). Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky, 19, 187–193. [in Ukrainian].

Reient, O. (2011). Ukraina v umovakh transformatsii XIX – pochatku XX st. Hurzhiivski istorychni chytannia, 4, 207–208. [in Ukrainian].

Stepanova, S. (2013). Razvitie volostnogo suda v Rossijskoj imperii v poreformennyj period. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN, 2, 58–70. [in Russian].

Verkhovtseva, I. (2014). “Krashche sud panskyi nizh selianskyi”: volosnyi sud v Rosii v umovakh modernizatsii sela poreformenoi doby. Intelihentsiia i vlada. Seriia: Istorychni nauky, 3, 70–82. [in Ukrainian].

Verkhovtseva, I. (2014). “Volosni sudy u nas usiudy ne vdalys”: selianske pravosuddia v Rosii poreformenoi doby. Hurzhiivski istorychni chytannia, 7, 256–259. [in Ukrainian].

Verkhovtseva, I. (2017). Samovriaduvannia selian u Rosiiskii imperii yak chynnyk selianskoi revoliutsii pochatku XX st. Ukrainskyi selianyn, 18, 8–19. [in Ukrainian].

Verkhovtseva, I. (2018). Mizh korporatyvnistiu i biurokratyzmom: samovriaduvannia selian u Rosiiskii imperii (druha polovyna XIX – pochatok XX st.). Cherkasy. [in Ukrainian].

Verkhovtseva, I. (2018). Selianske samovriaduvannia v Rosiiskii imperii (druha polovyna XIX – pochatok XX st.). (Candidate’s thesis). Cherkasy. [in Ukrainian].

Zajonchkovskij, P. (1968). Otmena krepostnogo prava v Rossii. Moskva. [in Russian].

Zyryanov, P. (1982). Sotsialnaya struktura mestnogo upravleniya kapitalisticheskoj Rossii (1861–1914). Istoricheskie zapiski, 107, 247–248. [in Russian].

Published

2021-06-29

How to Cite

Melnychuk, K. (2021). Peasant Self-Government in the Right-Bank Ukraine in the Second Half of the Nineteenth – Early Twentieth Centuries: the Personnel Formation. Ukrainian Historical Journal, (3), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2021.03.028

Issue

Section

HISTORICAL ARTICLES