O.Apanovych: Evolution of the Views of the Ukrainian Soviet Historian in the Light of Her Intellectual Biography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2021.04.175Keywords:
Apanovych, intellectual biography, views evolution, worldview, soviet / postsoviet historiansAbstract
This article reflects upon the formation of the Soviet/Postsoviet Ukrainian historian, Ukrainian cossaks researcher. There is a scientific challenge of an assessment of the soviet scientists contribution determination and thus the value of their scientific heritage. Despite Soviet ideological framework, the scientist managed to make a significant contribution towards the modern history and heritage protection activities. As O.Apanovych had been living during the rise and fall of the Soviet regime, her biography has a great value for analysis of the Soviet and Postsoviet times and their influence on gains and losses for the Ukrainian science.
The objective of this article is the analyse the intellectual biography of O.Apanovych in its development as well as research on historians’ daily routines in Soviet and Postsoviet regimes.
During the research the methods of intellectual bibliography, which has allowed to demonstrate the change in views of the scientist through internal (psychological and views on values) and external (social, cultural, professional), were used.
Conclusions. The evolution of O.Apanovych views has taken the place not only under the influence of 1920–2000s events but also were determined by her activity and family (including her brother Mykhailo), closest allies, colleagues-scientists. Prosopographical analysis shows that the most significant influence on O.Apanovych formation as a professional had K.Huslystui, F.Shevchenko, colleagues from the academic Institute of History Academy of Sciences of UkrSSR. Significant impact has been made by the 60th movement and dissidents. At the same time, due to the intellectual activities, critical assessment of the social-political life, she was herself an influencer. O.Apanovych became a non-conformist representative of the Ukrainian Soviet historians. During the independence times, due to active social and scientific activity was well regarded in the society.
References
Andrieiev, V. (2005). Intehralnyi napriam suchasnoi istoriohrafii: intelektualna istoriia. Eidos, 1, 17–23. [in Ukrainian].
Apanovych, O. M. (2004). Fedir Pavlovych Shevchenko: istoryk, arkhivist, istoriohraf, dzhereloznavets, arkheohraf, orhanizator nauky, Liudyna. “Istynu vstanovliuie sud istorii”: Zbirnyk na poshanu Fedora Pavlovycha Shevchenka, 1, 15–130. Kyiv: Derzh kom. arkhiv Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
Bazhan, O. (2012). Pid pylnym kontrolem KDB. Istoriohrafichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini, 22, 115–134. [in Ukrainian].
Bazhan, O. H., Danyliuk, Yu. Z. (2000). Opozytsiia v Ukraini (druha polovyna 50-kh – 80-ti rr. XX st.). Kyiv: Ridnyi krai. [in Ukrainian].
Blyzniak, M. B. (2006). Vadym Arkhypovych Diadychenko (1909–1973) – istoryk Ukrainy. Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis. Dnipropetrovsk. [in Ukrainian].
Chyshko, V. S. (1996). Biohrafichna tradytsiia ta naukova biohrafiia v istorii i suchasnosti Ukrainy. Kyiv: BMT. [in Ukrainian].
Demuz, I., Zlenko, A., Isaikina, O. (2019). Perspektyvy vyvchennia intelektualnoho spivtovarystva v rusli novykh metodolohichnykh kontseptiv. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 6, 172–187. [in Ukrainian].
Dmytriienko, M. F. (1999). 80-richchia vid dnia narodzhennia O. M. Apanovych. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 5, 71–86. [in Ukrainian].
Dzyra, Ya. I. (2004). Desiatyrichchia tvorchoho spilkuvannia. “Istynu vstanovliuie sud istorii”: Zbirnyk na poshanu Fedora Pavlovycha Shevchenka, 1, 150–164. Kyiv: Derzh kom. arkhiv Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
Kaparulin, Yu. V. (2014). Oleksandr Riabinin-Skliarevskyi: intelektualna biohrafiia istoryka (1878–1942 rr.). Kherson: Helvetyka. [in Ukrainian].
Kolesnyk, I. (2009). Merezheva model nauky (novyi proekt ukrainskoi istoriohrafii?). Eidos, 4, 54–88. [in Ukrainian].
Kolesnyk, I. I. (2008). Intelektualne spivtovarystvo yak zasib legitymatsii kulturnoi istorii Ukrainy. XIX stolittia. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 1, 169–193. [in Ukrainian].
Liashko, S. M. (2013). Poniattia „naukova biohrafiia” u teorii ta praktytsi istoryko-biohrafichnykh doslidzhen. Ukrainska biohrafistyka, 10, 25–47. [in Ukrainian].
Popyk, V. (2015). Biography – biohrafika – biohrafistyka – biobibliohrafiia: poniatiinyi arsenal istoryko-biohrafichnykh doslidzhen. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 3, 122–136. [in Ukrainian].
Riepina, L. P. (2011). Istoriograficheskaya nauka na rubezhe XX–XXI vv.: Sotsialnye teorii i istoriograficheskaya praktika. Moskva. [in Russian].
Smolii, V. A. (Ed.). (2018). Narysy z sotsiokulturnoi istorii ukrainskoho istoriiepysannia: subdystsyplinarni napriamy. Kyiv: Heneza. [in Ukrainian].
Tarnashynska, L. (2010). Ukrainske shistdesiatnytstvo: profili na tli pokolinnia (Istoryko-literaturnyi ta poetykalnyi aspekty). Kyiv: Smoloskyp. [in Ukrainian].
Udod, O. (2015). Istorychna nauka v Ukraini periodu „zastoiu”: problema vzaiemyn istorykiv i vlady. O.A.Udod (Ed.), Dystsyplinarni vymiry ukrainskoi istoriohrafii. Kyiv: In-t istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
Vashchenko, V. (2009). Kontsept „intelektualna biohrafiia” ta konstruiuvannia „naukovykh biohrafii” v ukrainskii istoriohrafii. Eidos, 4, 480–481. [in Ukrainian].
Yaremchuk, V. (2009). Mynule Ukrainy v istorychnii nautsi URSR pisliastalinskoi doby. Ostroh: Vyd-vo Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. [in Ukrainian].
Yusov, S. (2011). Istoryk Volodymyr Holobutskyi (1903–1993 rr.): zhyttia, naukova i pedahohichna diialnist. Kyiv: In-t istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
