Ukrainian Sociohumanities of War Times: Challenges, Prospects, Opportunities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2022.04.055Keywords:
Russia’s war against Ukraine 2014–2022, neo-imperial Russia, warring Ukraine, national sociohumanities, traumatic experience, modernity, war timesAbstract
The aim of the article. Comprehension of latest cognitive situation, which arose in a modern Ukrainian sociohumanities resulted in extreme premises and destructive conditions of war times.
The methodology is based upon strategy of representation and extrapolation of guiding tendencies and prospects for functioning of social and humanistic disciplines during war times.
Scientific novelty. It has been considered a palette of basic challenges and problems for current Ukrainian sociohumanities defined by war with neo-imperial Russia for national and independent sovereignty of Ukraine. It has been accentuated that challenges to humanists and social scientists are aligned with weirdly challenges for the entire Ukraine, though they have their own relevant extents. It has been stressed that priorities of the Ukrainian sociohumanities are linked up, first, to creation of multiform images of warring Ukraine. It has been noted that Ukraine has found itself in the epicenter of catastrophic sociocultural breaks-up of the global world, which for the most part are qualified now in the context of war scenario for starvation of medium and long duration. It has been disclosed that current war has become the result of neo-imperial Putin’s Russia aimed for annihilation of Ukraine as the nation and complete dissolution of Ukrainian identity. It has been established that Russian expansion is antiglobalistic, revanchist and aimed for reformatting of the world order and post-Soviet space delimitation.
Conclusions. The article confirms that full-scale phase of Russo-Ukrainian war resulted in configuration of the newest historical times at the post-Soviet historical spaces, began as long ago as in 2014. Conception is uphold that current Ukrainian sociohumanities has to be focused on development of three main units of interdependent problems: a) creation of adequate scientific palette of fighting Ukraine; b) studying of a place and role of our country in times of the global world system crisis; c) outline of Russo-Ukrainian war nature and temporal metamorphoses of the present.
References
"Antoniuk, D. (2022). Kultura pid prytsilom: Yak voroh znyshchuie ukrainski istorychni pamiatky. [in Ukrainian].
"Holovakha, Ye. (2022). “U tsi dni ostatochno formuietsia suchasna ukrainska natsiia”. [in Ukrainian].
"Horbulin, V., Badrak, V. (2022). Viina na vysnazhennia: v ochikuvanni novoi fazy. [in Ukrainian].
Horbulin, V. P. (Ed.). (2017). Svitova hibrydna viina: ukrainskyi front. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
"Libanova, E. (2022). “Ukraina maie borotysia za povernennia svoikh bizhentsiv”. [in Ukrainian].
Liber, G., Mostovyc, A. (Comps.). (1978). Nonconformity and Dissent in the Ukrainian SSR, 1955–1975: An Annotated Bibliography. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute.
"Losiev, I. (2013). Bezalternatyvnist rozmezhuvannia: Chomu deradianizatsiia v Ukraini nemozhlyva bez derusyfikatsii. [in Ukrainian].
Nakhmanovych, V. (2022). Svit pislia viiny. Retrieved from: https://www.istpravda.com.ua/articles/2022/03/21/161088 [in Ukrainian].
Ohloblyn, O. (1973). Problema skhemy istorii Ukrainy 19–20 st. (do 1917 r.). Miunkhen; Niu-York: UIT. [in Ukrainian].
Papakin, H. (2022). Dopysy pid revinnia syren. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 1, 79–102. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.47315/archives2022.330.079
"Papakin, H. (2022). Pislia peremohy, abo Novyi svitovyi poriadok. [in Ukrainian].
Parakhonskyi, B. O., Yavorska, H. M. (2019). Ontolohiia viiny i myru: bezpeka, stratehiia, smysl. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
"Plokhii, S. (2022). Tsia viina ye viinoiu za vsiu Yevropu. [in Ukrainian].
"Portnov, A. (2022). Nareshti pryiniaty Ukrainu yak subiekt (Pro nimetsku ukrainistyku i ne tilky). [in Ukrainian].
Pyrozhkov, S. I., Smolii, V. A. (Eds.). (2020). Ukraina yak tsyvilizatsiinyi subiekt istorii ta suchasnosti: natsionalna dopovid. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. [in Ukrainian].
Reient, O. P. (Ed.). (2021). Liudyna na viini: ukrainskyi sotsium cherez pryzmu Pershoi ta Druhoi svitovykh voien: Istorychni narysy. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Rudnytsky, I. (1958). The Intellectual Origins of Modern Ukraine. The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U.S, 6(3/4), 1381–1405.
Satter, D. (2016). Menshe znaiesh, krashche spysh: Shliakh Rosii do teroru ta dyktatury za Yeltsyna i Putina. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Skalskyi, V. (Comp.). (2022). Sotyi den sprotyvu ahresii Rosii: Facebook-refleksii. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Smolii, V. A. (Ed.). (2021). Ukraina i ukraintsi v postimpersku dobu (1917–1939). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Smolii, V. A. (Ed.). (2021). Ukraina i vyklyky posttotalitarnoho tranzytu (1990–2019). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Smolii, V. A. (Ed.). (2021). Ukraina v epitsentri protystoiannia svitovykh system (1939–1990). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
"Snyder, T. (2022). We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.
Tillet, L. (1975). Ukrainian Nationalism and the Fall of Shelest. Slavic Review, 34 (4), 752–768. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2495726
Verstiuk, V. (2022). Dumky z pidvalu (Dumky ta refleksii voiennoi doby): Diariush istoryka. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Yurkova, O. (2015). Facebook yak novyi typ istorychnoho dzherela: sproba kharakterystyky ta praktychni zavdannia arkhivuvannia dokumentiv. Spetsialni istorychni dystsypliny: pytannia teorii ta metodyky. Elektronni informatsijni resursy, 25, 31–48. [in Ukrainian].
