Kharkiv Defense Operation (February 24 — May 14, 2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2023.05.023%20Keywords:
armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, Kharkiv defense operation, Armed Forces of Ukraine, operational art, tactical solutions.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to reconstruct the course of events of the Kharkiv defensive operation, which lasted from February 24 to May 14, 2022.
The novelty is that it presents the first comprehensive study of an important defensive operation of the Russo-Ukrainian war in domestic historiography.
The research methodology is based on the application of the problemchronological method, the method of analysis and synthesis, and the use of a wide range of official and unofficial sources.
Main results. The capture of Kharkiv was considered by the Russian command as one of the main tasks at the stage of a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Due to its proximity to the border with the Russian Federation, the city was attacked in the first hours of the war. However, it was not possible to capture Kharkiv at once as planned. The reasons for this were the competently organized defense of the city, as well as the enemy’s underestimation of the fighting capacity of the Ukrainian forces, which led to the assignment of an obviously insufficient number of troops for the attack on Kharkiv. These factors also did not allow the Russian command to blockade the city. At the beginning of March 2022, the front line in the Kharkiv region stabilized. Russian troops took up positions on the northern and eastern outskirts of Kharkiv, shelling the city systematically. This situation persisted until the end of April, when the final stage of the Kharkiv defense operation began — the Ukrainian counteroffensive. As a result, by May 14, 2022, Russian troops were pushed back from the region northeast of Kharkiv. The breakthrough of the Kharkiv siege created a serious threat to the supply routes of the Russian group in the Izium direction, in addition to the liberation of more than 20 settlements, as well as pushing back the enemy for several tens of kilometers. As a result, the Russian command failed to realize its plan to surround and defeat the Ukrainian troops in Donbas. The conducted analysis made it possible to outline the prospects for further research, which lie in a more detailed study of the course of the Kharkiv defense operation with an emphasis on the study of its individual stages and episodes, the search for new sources, and their introduction into scientific handling.
References
Khlon, S., Pahiria, O., Poltorakov, O. (2022). “Skhidna brama derzhavy” (Oborona Kharkova (24 liutoho — 14 travnia 2022 r.). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
(2022). Khronika vijny. Chastyna I (pershi 30 dib rosijsko-ukrainskoi vijny 24.02 — 26.03.2022). Kyiv: NUOU im. Ivana Cherniakhovskoho. [in Ukrainian].
(2022). Khronika viiny. Chastyna II (rosiisko-ukrainska viina 27.03 — 25.04.2022). Kyiv: NUOU im. Ivana Cherniakhovskoho. [in Ukrainian].
(2022). Khronika viiny. Chastyna III (rosiisko-ukrainska viina 26.03 — 26.05.2022). Kyiv: NUOU im. Ivana Cherniakhovskoho. [in Ukrainian].
(2022). Voienno-istorychnyi opys rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny. Liutyi — berezen 2022 r. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
(2022). Voienno-istorychnyi opys rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny. Kviten 2022 r. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
(2022). Voienno-istorychnyi opys rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny. Traven 2022 r. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Cielma, M. (2022). Przed bitwą wszystkich bitw. Wojna w Ukrainie. Nowa Technika Wojskowa. 4: 8-13. [in Polish].
Cielma, M. (2022). Bitwa o Donbas i upadek Mariupola. Nowa Technika Wojskowa. 5: 10-14. [in Polish].
Gawęda, M. (2022). Wojna rosyjsko-ukraińska. Cz. 1. Wojsko i Technika. 3: 16-24. [in Polish].
Gawęda, M. (2022). Wojna rosyjsko-ukraińska. Cz. 2. Wojsko i Technika. 4: 12-20. [in Polish].
Gawęda, M. (2022). Wojna rosyjsko-ukraińska. Cz. 3. Wojsko i Technika. 5: 32-41. [in Polish].
"Yakushko, O. (2023. 13 liutoho). Naikrytychnishyi den. Yak 27 liutoho vidbuvavsia bii za tsentr Kharkova. Obiektyv. [in Ukrainian].
"Ivanets, O. (2022. 02 veresnya). Yak u liutomu Syly oborony Kharkova znyshchyly spetsnaz rf u shkoli N 134. ArmiyaInform. [in Ukrainian].
"(2022. 12 hrudnya). Ukhvala v spravi N 642/1618/22 vid 08.12.2022 r. Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen. [in Ukrainian].
"(2022. 2 kvitnya). Kilkist zahyblykh vid udaru po Kharkivskii obladministratsii zbilshylas do 29. New Voice. [in Ukrainian].
"Volikovska, U. (2022. 07 bereznya). V khodi vedennia boiovykh dii zvilneno Chuhuiv. Glavkom. [in Ukrainian].
"Fedorkova, T. (2022. 07 bereznya). “Tsiu viinu my vzhe prohraly”, — Maksym Kryshtop, polonenyi u Kharkovi rosiiskyi lotchyk. Suspilne novyny. [in Ukrainian].
Strembski, M. (2022). Wojna powietrzna nad Ukrainą. 24 luty — 23 marca 2022. Lotnictwo. 3: 16-31. [in Polish].
Strembski, M. (2022). Wojna powietrzna nad Ukrainą. 24 marca — 23 kwietnia 2022. Lotnictwo. 4: 16-29. [in Polish].
"(2022. 16 travnya). Minoborony: viiskovykh RF vidtisnyly do derzhkordonu na Kharkivshchyni. Radio Svoboda. [in Ukrainian].
Kharuk, A. (2023). Slobozhanska nastupalna operatsiia: peredumovy i pershyi etap (6-12 veresnia 2022 r.). Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal. 1: 5-19. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2023.01.005


