The subjective component of the agrarian question as one of the prerequisites of the Ukrainian revolution of 1917–1921

Authors

  • S.V. Kornovenko доктор історичних наук, професор, професор кафедри інтелектуальної власності та цивільно-правових дисциплін Черкаського національного університету імені Богдана Хмельницького

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2017.04.083

Keywords:

peasant-ideоman, active subject of history, peasant revolution, Poltava and Kharkiv provinces.

Abstract

The author in this article examines the subject factor of the agrarian question as one of the preconditions of Ukrainian revolution of 1917–1921. In this article substantiated the reasons of the deep sociocultural transformations in the villages in the early
20th century. On the forefront of history appeared the new active subject – the peasantideоman. Peasant revolutionism became some kind of the catalyst for institutional changes of thenadays Russian imperial model. The peasantry came into the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917–1921 with considerable experience of the behaviour as the active subject of history, largely predetermining its causes, course and finale.

References

Chistyakov, O. (Ed). (1994). Rossijskoe zakonodatel'stvo X–XX vv. (V. 9). (T. 9). Moskva. [in Russian].

"Danilov, V. Krest'yanskaya revolyuciya v Rossii, 1902–1922 gg. [in Russian].

Kabytov, P. (1999). Russkoe krest'yanstvo v nachale XX veka. Samara, 1999. [in Russian].

Kabytov, P. (2011). Shtrixi k portretu Viktora Viktorovicha Kondrashina. Novejshie issledovaniya istorikov Povolzh'ya: sbornik statej. (2), 4–7. [in Russian].

Kamyu, A. (1990). Buntuyushhij chelovek. Filosofiya. Politika. Iskusstvo. Moskva. [in Russian].

Khrystiuk P. (2002). Problemy vyvchennia istorii Ukrains'koi revoliutsii 1917–1920 rr. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Konec krepostnichestva v Rossii (dokumenty, pis'ma, memuary, stat'i). (1994). Moskva. [in Russian].

Konkvest, R. (2003). Rozdumy nad spliundrovanym storichchiam. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Kononenko, Yu., Kononenko, S. (2016). Selians'ka revoliutsiia 1902 – ? rr. Ukrains'kyj selianyn. (16), 73–78. [in Ukrainian].

Korelin, A. (2005). Pervaya revolyuciya v Rossii: vzglyad cherez stoletie. Moskva. [in Russian].

Kornovenko, S. (2015). Selians'ka revoliutsiia 1917–1921 rr.: likvidatsiia pomischyts'koho zemlevolodinnia v Ukraini. Ukrains'kyj selianyn. (15), 56. [in Ukrainian].

Koval'ova, N. (2016). Seliany, pomischyky i derzhava: konflikty interesiv. «Ahrarna revoliutsiia» v Ukraini 1902 – 1922 rr. Dnipropetrovs'k: LIRA, 2016. [in Ukrainian].

Leschenko, M. (1977). Ukrains'ke selo v revoliutsii 1905–1907 rr. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

"Marchenya, P., Razin, S., Ionov, I. Krest'yanstvo i vlast' v istorii Rossii XX veka: po itogam mezhdunarodnogo kruglogo stola.

Ozerov, I. (2008). Osnovy finansovoj nauki. Byudzhet. Formy vzimaniya. Mestnye finansy. Kredit (ed. 1906). Moskva. [in Russian].

"Pajps, R. (2009). Russkaya revolyuciya. [in Russian].

"Prostakov, S. Setevoe krest'yanskoe vosstanie v 1902 g. [in Russian].

"Prostakov, S. Sorok let posle otmeny krepostnogo prava ponadobilos' dlya togo, chtoby krest'yane vnov' zaxoteli zemel'nogo peredela. [in Russian].

Safonov, D. (2012). Krest'yanstvo kak ob"ekt i sub"ekt processa modernizacii. Visnik Cherkas'kogo universitetu. Seriya istorichni nauk, (35 (248)), 15–18. [in Russian].

Shanin, T. (1997). Revolyuciya kak moment istiny. Rossiya 1905–1907 gg., 1917–1922 gg. Moskva. [in Russian].

Sidel'nikov, S. (1980). Agrarnaya politika samoderzhaviya v period imperializma. Moskva. [in Russian].

Smolij, V. (Ed). (2006). Istoriia ukrains'koho selianstva. Kyiv. (1). [in Ukrainian].

"Soldatenko, V. Doba ukrains'koi revoliutsii (1917–1920 rr.) u novitnij istoriohrafii.

Stolypin, A. (1991). P.A. Stolypin. Moskva. [in Russian].

Stolypin, P. (1991). P.A. Stolypin – zhizn' i smert' za carya. Rechi v Gosudarstvennom Sovete i Dume. Moskva. [in Russian].

Sviaschenko, Z. (2012). Prouriadovi ahrarni initsiatyvy v Rosijs'kij imperii na pochatku XX st. Uman'. [in Ukrainian].

Sych, O. (2014). Tsyvilizatsijna spadschyna Pershoi svitovoi vijny. Istorychna panorama. (19), 30–42. [in Ukrainian].

"Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy Pro zakhody z vidznachennia 100-richchia podij Ukrains'koi revoliutsii 1917–1921 rokiv.

Verkhovtseva, I. (2015). Stanove samovriaduvannia i protesnyj rukh selian v Rosijs'kij imperii na pochatku KhKh st.: «selians'ki respubliky». Suchasni vyklyky dlia humanitarnykh nauk v umovakh hlobalizatsii, 76–78. [in Ukrainian].

Verkhovtseva, I. (2016). Polityzatsiia samovriaduvannia selian u Rosijs'kij imperii u 1902 – 1907 rokakh iak pochatkovyj etap selians'koi revoliutsii. Ukrains'kyj selianyn. (16), 58–69. [in Ukrainian].

Verstiuk, V. (2003). Peredmova Ukrains'kyj natsional'no-vyzvol'nyj rukh. Berezen'–lystopad 1917. [in Ukrainian].

Vitte, S. (1991). Izbrannye vospominaniya. 1849–1911 gg. Moskva. [in Russian].

Zamkovyj, P. (1985). Z istorii «selians'koi respubliky» na Sumschyni. Ukrains'kyj istorychnyj zhurnal. (12), 87–94. [in Ukrainian].

Published

2017-07-08

How to Cite

Kornovenko, S. (2017). The subjective component of the agrarian question as one of the prerequisites of the Ukrainian revolution of 1917–1921. Ukrainian Historical Journal, (4), 83. https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2017.04.083

Issue

Section

HISTORICAL ARTICLES