Social advances and material benefits from the tenure of the regimental government in the Hetmanate: nobility, estates, sables…
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2017.04.020Keywords:
Ukrainian state of the early modern times, Het’manshchyna, colonel of the Zaporozhian Host, agrarian relations, ranked estates.Abstract
The article examines the material compensation of Cossack officers for the execution of their mission of Colonel Cossack Army. Accentuated a particular attention is paid to social advances Cossack, evidenced especially in their admission to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth nobility and gentry of Moscow Tsardom. Investigates the possible ways to get ranked colonels and hereditary estates, and the ratio of different forms of tenure among colonel corporation and regional features of the growth of petty land ownership in Het’manshchyna. Establishes given motives initiatives hetman and the tsarist government. It turns out what factors determine a list of possible articles enrichment representative’s colonel corporations and reasons, depended on its sizes. Also focuses the attention on the obvious manifestations of nepotism and patron relationship the distribution of the Het’manshchyna land among the colonels.
References
Borysenko V.I. (1986). Sotsialno-ekonomichnyi rozvytok Livoberezhnoi Ukrainy v druhii polovyni XVII st. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Butych I. (Comps.). (2007). Heneralne slidstvo pro maietnosti Poltavskoho polku: 1729–1730. Poltava. [in Ukrainian].
Butych I., Rynsevych V., Teslenko I. (Comps.). (2004). Universaly ukrainskykh hetmaniv vid Ivana Vyhovskoho do Ivana Samoilovycha (1657–1687). Kyiv; Lviv. [in Ukrainian].
Horobets V. (2001). Elita kozatskoi Ukrainy v poshukakh politychnoi lehitymatsii: stosunky z Moskvoiu ta Varshavoiu, 1654-1665. Kyiv: Krytyka. [in Ukrainian].
Horobets V. (2014). Polkovnyk Viiska Zaporozkoho ta yoho vlada. Ukrainskyj istorychnyj zhurnal – Ukrainian Historical Journal, 4. 50–70. [in Ukrainian]. [in Ukrainian].
Horobets V. (2014). Polkovnyk Viiska Zaporozkoho: pravo vilnoi elektsii v svitli kozatskykh tradytsii, rozporiadchykh prypysiv i politychnykh realii (seredyna XVII – persha chvert XVIII st.). In V. A. Smolii (Ed.), Ukrainska derzhava druhoi polovyny XVII–XVIII st.: polityka, suspilstvo, kultura. Kyiv. 88–125. [in Ukrainian].
Horobets V. (2015). Pravo vilnoi elektsii polkovnyka Viiska Zaporozkoho: kozatski tradytsii u vyprobuvanni imperskymy novatsiiamy. Ukrainskyj istorychnyj zhurnal – Ukrainian Historical Journal, 5. 70–91. [in Ukrainian].
Horobets V. (2017). Sotsialni avansy ta materialni vyhody vid posidannia polkovoho uriadu v Hetmanati: ralets, chynsh, «vyna panska», «dobrovilni» robotyzny ta inshi proiavy publichnoi povahy. In V. A. Smolii (Ed.), Ukraina v Tsentralno-Skhidnii Yevropi: Studii z istorii XVI–XVIII st. 17. [in Ukrainian].
Kohut Z. (1996). Rosiiskyi tsentralizm i ukrainska avtonomiia, 1760–1830. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Krypiakevych I.P. (1990). Bohdan Khmelnytskyi. Lviv. [in Ukrainian].
Kulakovskyi P. (2008). Kozatske posolstvo na seim 1659 r. In Sokhan P. (Ed.), Hadiatska uniia 1658 r. Kyiv. 109–120. [in Ukrainian].
Kulakovskyi P. (Comps.). (1999). Pamiatky istorii Skhidnoi Yevropy: Dzherela XV–XVII st. (Vol. 5). Ostroh; Varshava; Moskva. [in Ukrainian].
Ochmann S. (1977). Sejmy lat 1661–1662: przegrana batalia o reformę ustroju Rzeczypospolitej. Wrocław. [in Polish].
