Changing Generations of Historians as a Methodological and Worldview Dialogue in Ukrainian Historiography (End of the Nineteenth – First Twenty Years of the Twenty-First Century)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2020.04.137Keywords:
generation, Ukrainian historiography, methodology, historians, changing generations, scientific schools, succession, continuityAbstract
The purpose of study to find out peculiarities of change of generations of historians in Ukrainian historiography end of the 19 – beginning of the 21 centuries based on a generic theory of generations, to trace its impact on updating methodological and conceptual foundations, problems of historical science, enrichment of research experience.
Research methodology including consistent adherence to the principles of historicism, continuity, anthropologism, civilization, energy, sociocultural, generation and system approaches, application of methods of historiographic analysis and synthesis, comparative studies, modeling, specific-historical, historical-chronological, historicalgenetic cognition and own observations.
Scientific novelty is due to the fact that for the first time it is based on the author's experience, as well as the precursors systematically considered the process and features of generations changes of Ukrainian historians in the context of general trends in the implementation of the principle continuity taking into account the specific historical conditions of the history of Ukraine of the modern era.
Conclusions. As a result of the process research of changes of historians generations have revealed its influence on the development of Ukrainian historiography from the end of 19 to the first decades of 21 centuries, its theoretical and methodological are covered, historiosophic and historical principles, terminology apparatus, principles of succession and continuity, as well as crises and conflicts. Within this period, six generations of Ukrainian historians were conditionally separated to the present; the criteria of their chronological boundaries are substantiated, named leaders and the most characteristic features of each. The traditions and innovations of the methodological tools of each of the generations, their common and distinctive features are traced. Attention is drawn to the turning points in the change of generations, their influence on the outlook and values of Ukrainian historians, activity of scientific institutions, centers and schools in Ukraine and abroad, on issues of research, updating of paradigm, conceptual and methodological approaches in historical science, content of historical education.
References
Bondar, V. (2014). Suchasna ukrainska istoriohrafia: pidsumky i vyklyky. Istoriohrafichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini, 25, 95. [in Ukrainian].
Dashkevych, Ya. (2011). Postmodernizm ta ukrainska istorychna nauka. «Uchy nelozhnymy ustamy skazaty pravdu»: istorychna eseistyka, 341–345. [in Ukrainian].
Hlomozda, K. (2004). Stan ukrainskoi istoriohrafii ta vyznachennia yii roli v suchasnomu suspilstvi. Mahisterium, 17: Istorychni studii. [in Ukrainian].
Holovko, V.V. (2003). Istoriohrafiia kryzy istorychnoi nauky: Ukrayinskyi kontekst. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Hrytsak, Ya. (2005). Ukrainska istoriohrafiia: 1991–2001: Desiatylittia zmin. Ukraina moderna, 9, 66–67. [in Ukrainian].
Hyrych, I. (2016). Mykhailo Hrushevskyi – konstruktor ukrainskoi modernoi natsii. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Kahanov, Yu. (2019). Konstruiuvannia radianskoi liudyny (1953–1991): ukrainska versiia. Zaporizhzhia. [in Ukrainian].
Kalakura, Ya.S. (2016). Metodolohiia istoriohrafichnoho doslidzhennia. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kalakura, Ya.S. (2012). Ukrainska istoriohrafiia. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Kolesnyk, I.I. (2000). Ukrainska istoriohrafiia (XVIII – pochatok XX st.). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Kolesnyk, I.I. (2013). Ukrainska istoriohrafiia: kontseptualna istoriia. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Kolesnyk, I.I. (2016). Instytut istorii Ukrainy: Nove ukrainske vidrodzhennia. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Kondratiuk, K. (2002). Ukrainska istoriohrafiia XIX – pochatku XX st.: osnovni napriamy i kontseptsii. Lviv. [in Ukrainian].
Kotsur, V.P., Kotsur, A.P. (1999). Istoriohrafiia istorii Ukrainy. Chernivtsi. [in Ukrainian].
Kulchytskyi, S. (2005). Holodomor 1932–1933 rr. v Ukraini yak henotsyd. Problemy istorii Ukrainy: fakty, sudzhennia, poshuky, 14, 225–300. [in Ukrainian].
Lutsyshyn, O.B. (2018). Heneratsiina teoriia Ivana Franka. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu: Seriia filolohichna, 67(2), 101–107. [in Ukrainian].
Matviichuk, O. (2018). Teoriia pokolin: chomu my rizni ta yak porozumitysia odne z odnym. Praktyka upravlinnia doshkilnym zakladom, 7, 36–41. [in Ukrainian].
Onyshchenko, A.S. (2014). Pokolinnia yak sotsialna katehoriia. Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly: Seriia Sotsiolohiia, 234, 222, 61–62. [in Ukrainian].
Ostrianko, A. (2012). Naukovi istorychni shkoly v Ukraini: fantomy ukrainskoi istoriorafii. Istoriohrafichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini, 22, 293–310. [in Ukrainian].
Serykh, A.A. (2010). Pokolencheskaya identichnost istorikov Rossii v kontse XIX – nachale XX vv.: Avtoref. diss. ... kand. ist. nauk. Omsk. [in Russian].
Udod, A. (2015). Prosopohrafichna palitra ukrainskykh radianskykh istorykiv doby «rozvynenoho sotsializmu». Svitlo i tini ukrainskoho radianskoho istoriopysannia, 161–168. [in Ukrainian].
Yaremchuk, V. (2009). Mynule Ukrainy v istorychnii nautsi URSR pisliastalinskoi doby. Ostroh. [in Ukrainian].
Yaremchuk, V. (2017). Ukrainska istoriohrafiia: suspilno-politychna istoriia. Ostroh. [in Ukrainian].
Żarnowski, J. (2015). Pokolenia historyków po 1945 r. a przeobrażenia polskiej historiografii. Klio Polska: Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Historiografii Polskiej, 7, 15–42. [in Polish].
Zashkilniak, L. (1999). Metodolohiia istorii: vid davnyny do suchasnosti. Lviv. [in Ukrainian].
