THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF APPROACHES TO THE COMMERCIALIZATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS IN MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES IN SOME FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND IN UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32471/oncology.2663-7928.t-23-1-2021-g.9355Keywords:
academic institution, biomedical industry, commercialization, innovation activity, institutions of higher education, science and technology innovation, technology transferAbstract
A comparative analysis of foreign and domestic experience in commercialization and technology transfer (TT) of medical and biological science and technology innovations (STI) was carried out; most important mechanisms and factors affecting the effectiveness of implementation were identified. Aim: to carry out a comparative analysis of strategies, mechanisms and approaches to the commercialization of the results of science and technology activities in the medical and biological field in the most developed countries and in Ukraine. Results: STI commercialization is a matter of state priority. In Ukraine, the practical application of universities’ and academic institutions’ innovative products is hindered by insufficiently developed state mechanisms for STI commercialization. Existing obstacles provoke the degradation of STI innovation potential, resulting in a negative impact on the universities and academic institutions financial support and in the prospects to achieve a higher level of research. A number of factors, related to the scientific and organizational approach, affect the implementation of innovations: imperfection in the patenting strategy and in the organizational and marketing activities, lack of interaction between science and clinical practice, shortage of competent professionals etc. It possible to discern some priorities for improving the efficiency of TT of state-funded domestic medical and biological STI: development of commercialization and TT centers, business incubators, specialized technology parks, establishment of a venture investment, stimulation of public-private partnerships for developing programs and projects of innovative products elaboration and release. The analysis of works by foreign experts in the development of innovation, commercialization and STI TT in economically developed countries (the USA, France, Germany, Finland and Sweden) revealed state support for launching close relationships between companies and universities and academic institutions for new technology centers establishment. The organization of financial support for the research projects and programs is an important function of foreign medical universities. Despite the different approaches to the commercialization of medical and biological STI in the universities and academic institutions of these countries, they have a leading role in determining national priority areas of medical and biological research.
References
Rozporiadzhennia KMU «Pro skhvalennia Stratehii rozvytku innovatsiinoi diialnosti na period do 2030 roku» URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/526–2019-р#Text (in Ukrainian).
Melnyk-Melnykov PH, Piatchanina TV, Ohorodnyk AM, Mazur MH. Analysis of foreign tech transfer offices experience for the effective tech transfer system formation in the Ukrainian scientific institutions. Science, technologies, innovations 2019; 3 (11): 62–69 (in Ukrainian).
Vazhytskyi SE, Shcherbak TI. Methodology and organization of scientific research. Sumy: SumDPU im. A.S. Makarenka, 2016. 260 р. (in Ukrainian).
Tsibulev PM. Three-level model of the national innovation system of Ukraine. Science and innovation 2018; 14 (3): 5–14 (in Ukrainian).
Yurynets ZV, Petrukh OA. State regulation and financing of innovation and investment activities in Ukraine. Investments: practice and experience 2018; (6): 79–82 (in Ukrainian).
Tsibulev PM, Korsun VF. Barriers to commercialization of research results in Ukraine. Science and innovation 2009; 5 (6): 87–96 (in Ukrainian).
Bruieva VA. Adaptive management of the process of acquisition of intellectual property rights and commercialization of research in higher education institutions. Problems of Engineer-Pedagogical Education 2020; (66): 42–51 (in Ukrainian).
International Co-operation in Research and Innovation. URL: https://www.kooperation-international.de/fileadmin/redaktion/publication/titel_bufi_engl_end.pdf
Litvinova OV, Posylkina OV. Management of intellectual resources in pharmacy in the conditions of innovative development. Kh.: NFaU, 2018. 360 p. (in Ukrainian).
Artamonova NO. Information support of medical technology transfer as a modern communication mechanism of innovative activity. Bibliotekoznavstvo. Dokumentoznavstvo. Informolohiia 2009; (3): 56–66 (in Ukrainian).
Tsibulev PM, Chebotarov VP, Suini Yu. Intellectual property management. К.: КІС, 2005. 442 р. (in Ukrainian).
Scientific and Innovative Activity of Ukraine: Statistical Collection. 2018. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/
Novikova YE, Bediukh OH, Zenova MV. Development of technology transfer system in KNU. T. Shevchenko in the context of European integration. Vestnyk KNUTD 2016; 2 (97): 63–70 (in Ukrainian).
Koval I. Problems of commercialization of intellectual property rights by higher education institutions. The theory and practice of intellectual property. 2014; (4): 11–18 (in Ukrainian).
Denisyuk VA. Commercialization of research results: problems and perspectives. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2006; (5): 45–50 (in Ukrainian).
Servoss J. The Early Tech Development Course: Experiential Commercialization Education for the Medical Academician. Acad. Med. 2017; 92 (4): 506–510.
The Bayh–Dole Act or Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act (Pub. L. 96–517, December 12, 1980). URL: https://www.gao.gov/archive/1998/rc98126.pdf
Analytical review of the implementation of state policy in foreign countries in the field of innovation and scientific and technological development. URL: http://www.ved.gov.ru/moder_innovac/analitic/.
Economic overview of Germany: market, productivity, innovation — Germany Trade & Invest, 2014.
Pysmeniuk AF, Boikivska HM. Development of innovation clusters: the experience of Sweden. 2016. http://dspace.tneu.edu.ua/handle/316497/7283 (in Ukrainian).
National Scientific Strategy — France Europe 2020. https://ru.ambafrance.org/Otchioty-i-strategiya
Krasnova HA, Nytsevych VF, Tahyrova ShV. France’s national research strategy. Uchenye Zapysky Orlovskoho Hosudarstvennoho Unyversyteta 2015; 5 (68): 351–357 (in Russian).
Kravtsov AA. The scientific complex and scientific policy of France in the XXI century: key directions and trends. MYR (Modernyzatsyia. Ynnovatsyy. Razvytye) 2018; 9 (4): 643–656 (in Russian).
Kyselev VN, Nechaeva EK. Innovative goals of modern state priorities in the field of science: a brief overview of foreign experience. Innovations 2015; 7 (201): 46–53 (in Russian).
Lyashenko OM. Models of commercialization and technology transfer in the global environment: monograph. Ternopil, 2007. 489 р.