СПЛЕНЕКТОМІЯ У ЛІКУВАННІ ХВОРИХ НА ДИФУЗНУ В-ВЕЛИКОКЛІТИННУ ЛІМФОМУ ТА ЇЇ РЕЗУЛЬТАТИ

Authors

  • Yu.L. Yevstakhevych State Institution “Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine” Lviv
  • M.M. Semerak State Institution “Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine”
  • I.Y. Yevstakhevych State Institution “Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine” Lviv
  • Ya.I. Vyhovska State Institution “Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine” Lviv
  • H.B. Lebed L’viv National Medical University named after Danylo Galytsky
  • I. M. Tumak L’viv National Medical University named after Danylo Galytsky
  • O.A. Petronchak L’viv Oncology Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center
  • V.E. Loginsky State Institution “Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine” Lviv

Keywords:

non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, splenectomy, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, immune thrombocytopenia.

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the immediate and long-term results of splenectomy in pa
tients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma and, as based on the results, to specify
indications for splenectomy, surgical approach and outcomes. Object and meth
ods: among 114 splenectomies in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL),
29 splenectomies were performed in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma
(DLBCL). Among them there were 15 men and 14 women 21–75 years old (me
dian age — 57 years). The indications for splenectomy in patients with DLBCL
were: splenomegaly, leukopenia, immune thrombocytopenia, autoimmune hemo
lytic anemia, regional portal hypertension, absence of diagnosis. The statistical
processing was performed by means of software package Statistica for Windows 6.0
(StatSoft, USA). Parametric data was presented as median (minimum-maximum)
[lower-upper quartiles]. The results of splenectomy were assessed in the immedi
ate post-splenectomy period (on the fourteenth–sixteenth day) pursuant to crite
ria described in the references and during follow-up control. The overall patients’
survival was determined by the Kaplan — Meier method and described as a medi
an survival (lower-upper quartiles) and 3- and 5-year survival was also estimated
constructing tables of cumulative survival. The survival curves were compared using
the log-rank and Cox tests. Results: splenectomy was effective in 25 (86.2%) pa
tients with DLBCL: abdominal discomfort, anemia, leukopenia were eliminated,
hemolysis associated with autoimmune hemolytic anemia stopped, and the num
ber of platelets associated with immune thrombocytopenia increased or normal
ized, and hemorrhagic syndrome disappeared. One patient died immediately af
ter splenectomy. Early postoperative mortality after splenectomy in patients with
DLBCL was 3.4%. The analysis of long-term results of splenectomy in DLBCL
patients showed that the median survival according to Kaplan — Meier curve was
31.9 months (observation period 1.0–192.0 months, the lower quartile and the
upper quartile are 5.6–72.5 months) with 3-year cumulative survival 48.7% of
patients and with 5-year — 32.9%. In patients with concomitant immune cytope
nias median survival was 6.5 months in contrast to 56.5 months in their absence.
The difference with between the groups was highly significant — p < 0.01 by log
rank criterion and Cox’s F Test. Multivariate analysis by Cox regression method
showed that in addition to cytopenia, an independent predictor of less survival is
an earlier onset of relapses, age and duration of the disease did not affect survival.
Conclusions: as a result of splenectomy in patients with DLBCL, the direct clini
cal and hematological effect occurred in 86.2% of cases. In DLBCL patients who
did not have concomitant immune cytopenias, the median survival after opera
tion was 56.5 months, in contrast to 6.5 months in the presence of immune cyto
penias. The best results of splenectomy in DLBCL were recorded in patients with
isolated spleen lesions: patients lived from 72 to 186 months

References

Iannito E, Tripodo C. How I diagnose and treat splenic lym

phomas. Blood 2011; 117 (9): 2585–95.

Arber DA, Rappaport H, Weiss L. Non-Hodgkin’s lym

phoproliferative disorders involving the spleen. Mod Pathol 1997;

: 18–32.

Gujral S, Lad P, Subramanian PG, et al. Histopathological

audit of splenectomies receive data cancer hospital. Indian J Pathol

Microbiol 2011; 54: 4879–6.

Hauswirth AW, Skrabs C, Schutzinger C, et al. Autoimmune

hemolytic anemia, Evans’ syndromes, and pure redcellaplasia in

non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Leuk Lymphoma 2007; 48 (6): 1139–49.

Hauswirth AW, Skrabs C, Schutzinger C, et al. Autoimmune

thrombocytopenia in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Hematologica

; 93 (3): 447–50.

Sallah S, Sigounas G, Vos P, et al. Autoimmune hemolytic

anemia in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: characteristics

and significance. Ann Oncol 2000; 11 (12): 1571–7.

Jaffe E, Harris N, Stein H, et al. Pathology and genetics

of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon, France:

IARC Press, 2001. 351 p.

Moormeier JA, Williams SF, Golomb HM. The staging of

non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Semin Oncol 1990; 17 (1): 43–50.

Kehoe JE, Daly JM, Straus DJ, et al. Value of splenecto

my in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer 1985; 55 (3): 1256–64.

Horowitz J, Smith JL, Weber TK, et al. Postoperative com

plications after splenectomy for hematologic malignancies. Ann

Surg 1996; 223 (3): 290–6.

Arnoletti JP, Karam J. Brodsky J. Early postoperative com

plications of splenectomy for hematologic disease. Am J Clin On

col 1999; 22 (2): 114–8.

Bickerstaff KI, Morris PJ. Splenectomy for massive sple

nomegaly. Br J Surg 1987; 74 (5): 346–9.

Brodsky J, Abkar A, Styler M. Splenectomy for non-Hodg

kin’s lymphoma. Am J Clin Oncol 1996; 19 (6): 558–61.

Delpero JR, Houvenaeghel G, Gastaut JA, et al. Splenecto

my for hypersplenism in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and ma

lignant non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Surg 1990; 77 (8): 957.

Dawson AA, Jones PF, King DJ. Splenectomy in the man

agement of haematological disease. Br J Surg 1987; 74 (5): 353–7.

Danforth DN Jr, Fraker DL. Splenectomy for the massive

ly enlarged spleen. Am Surg 1991; 57 (2): 108–13.

Chaffanjon PC, Brichon PY, Ranchoup Y, et al. Portal vein

thrombosis following splenectomy for hematologic disease: pro

spective study with Doppler color flow imaging. World J Surg 1998;

(10): 1082–6.

Loring LA, Panicek DM, Rarpeh MS. Portal system throm

bosis after splenectomy for neoplasm or chronic hematologic dis

order: is routine surveillance imaging necessary. J Comp As To

mography 1998; 22 (6): 856–60.

Schmeltzer J, Habermann TM, Timucin T, et al. Long

term clinical outcomes in patients with massive splenomegaly

and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma treated with splenectomy. Blood

; 120: 2692.

Mollejo M, Algara P, Mateo VS, et al. Large B-cell lym

phoma presenting in the spleen identification of different clini

copathologic conditions. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27: 895–902.

СПЛЕНЕКТОМІЯ У ЛІКУВАННІ ХВОРИХ

НА ДИФУЗНУ В-ВЕЛИКОКЛІТИННУ

ЛІМФОМУ ТА ЇЇ РЕЗУЛЬТАТИ

Downloads

Published

2018-12-27

How to Cite

Yevstakhevych, Y., Semerak, M., Yevstakhevych , I., Vyhovska, Y., Lebed, H., Tumak , I. M., Petronchak, O., & Loginsky, V. (2018). СПЛЕНЕКТОМІЯ У ЛІКУВАННІ ХВОРИХ НА ДИФУЗНУ В-ВЕЛИКОКЛІТИННУ ЛІМФОМУ ТА ЇЇ РЕЗУЛЬТАТИ. Oncology, 20(4), 269–274. Retrieved from https://nasu-periodicals.org.ua/index.php/oncology/article/view/29058

Issue

Section

Original investigations