PECULIARITIES OF DNA REPAIR IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD LYMPHOCYTES AND TUMOR TISSUE OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER PATIENTS

Authors

  • L.G. Buchynska Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України, Київ, Україна
  • O.V. Brieieva Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України, Київ, Україна
  • I.P. Nesinа Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України, Київ, Україна
  • N.M. Glushchenko Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України, Київ, Україна
  • O.V. Turchak Національний інститут раку МОЗ України, Київ, Україна
  • N.P. Iurchenko Інститут експериментальної патології, онкології і радіобіології ім. Р.Є. Кавецького НАН України, Київ, Україна

Keywords:

genome instability, peripheral blood lymphocytes, mismatch-repair, endometrial cancer.

Abstract

Summary. Aim: to compare the level of genomic instability in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and the expression of mismatch-repair (MMR) proteins in endometrial carcinoma cells with clinical characteristics of
endomerial cancer (EC) patients and tumor morphological features. Object and methods: evaluation of MMRproteins MSH2 and MLH1 expression was performed
by immunohistochemical method. DNA repair efficiency
in PBL was assessed by comet assay. Results: according
to immunohistochemical analysis all examined tumors
were divided into MMR-deficient (absence of MSH2
and/or MLH1) and MMR-proficient (presence of both
MSH2 and MLH1). MMR-deficient phenotype was observed mainly in G1- and G2-carcinomas with shallow
myometrial invasion, while MMR-proficient was more
typical for G3-tumors with deep invasion. Median number of recovered DNA damage in PBL was 63.9% and on
this basis all patients were assigned to groups with high
(> 63.9%) and low (< 63.9%) DNA repair efficiency
in PBL. It was shown that in EC patients with DNA repair efficiency in PBL the number of MMR-proficient
carcinomas was 100%, while in patients with low level
it was 78%. In addition, EC patients with high level of
recovered DNA in PBL had stronger MSH2 expression
(label index (LI) 72,0 ± 3,1%) than EC patients with
low level (LI 40,3 ± 2,2%). A similar trend was found
for the MLH1 (LI 66,7 ± 8,6 and 45,6 ± 4,0%, respectively). Conclusion: DNA repair efficiency in PBL
of EC patients is associated with expression of MMRproteins MLH1 and MSH2 that confirms the possibility of using PBL as surrogate markers.

References

Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next

generation. Cell 2011; 144 (5): 646–74.

Chao EC, Lipkin SM. Molecular models for the tissue specificity of DNA mismatch repair-deficient carcinogenesis. Nucleic

Acids Res 2006; 34 (3): 840–52.

Bridge G, Rashid S, Martin SA. DNA mismatch repair and

oxidative DNA damage: implications for cancer biology and treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2014; 6 (3): 1597–614.

Pena-Diaz J, Bregenhorn S, Ghodgaonkar M, et al. Noncanonical mismatch repair as a source of genomic instability in human cells. Mol Cell 2012; 47 (5): 669–80.

Jeggo PA, Pearl LH, Carr AM. DNA repair, genome stability and cancer: a historical perspective. Nat Rev Cancer 2016;

(1): 35–42.

Najafzadeh M, Baumgartner A, Gopalan R, et al. In vitro

sensitivities to UVA of lymphocytes from patients with colon and

melanoma cancers and precancerous states in the micronucleus

and the Comet assays. Mutagenesis 2012; 27 (3): 351–7.

Santos RA, Teixeira AC, Mayorano MB, et al. Basal levels

of DNA damage detected by micronuclei and comet assays in untreated breast cancer patients and healthy women. Clin Exp Med

; 10 (2): 87–92.

Walczak A, Rusin P, Dziki L, et al. Evaluation of DNA double strand breaks repair efficiency in head and neck cancer. DNA

Cell Biol 2012; 31 (3): 298–305.

Smith TR, Miller MS, Lohman KK, et al. DNA damage and

breast cancer risk. Carcinogenesis 2003; 24 (5): 883–9.

Kryston TB, Georgiev AB, Pissis P, et al. Role of oxidative stress and DNA damage in human carcinogenesis. Mutat Res

; 711 (1–2): 193–201.

Krupa R, Sobczuk A, Poplawski T, et al. DNA damage and

repair in endometrial cancer in correlation with the hOGG1 and

RAD51 genes polymorphism. Mol Biol Rep 2011; 38 (2): 1163–70.

Nesina IP, Iurchenko NP, Nespryad’ko SV, et al. The study

of chromosomal instability in patients with endometrial cancer.

Exp Oncol 2014; 36 (3): 202–6.

Buchynska L, Brieieva O, Glushchenko N, et al. DNA repair

deficiency in peripheral blood lymphocytes of endometrial cancer

patients with a family history of cancer. BMC Cancer 2014; 14: 765.

Herrera M, Dominguez G, Garcia JM, et al. Differences

in repair of DNA cross-links between lymphocytes and epithelial

tumor cells from colon cancer patients measured in vitro with the

comet assay. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15 (17): 5466–72.

Zhang YY, Gu KS. DNA repair capacity in peripheral blood

lymphocytes predicts efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in

patients with gastric cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 14 (9):

–12.

Li C, Wang LE, Wei Q. DNA repair phenotype and cancer susceptibility — a mini review. Int J Cancer 2009; 124 (5):

–1007.

Wu X, Gu J, Spitz MR. Mutagen sensitivity: a genetic predisposition factor for cancer. Cancer Res 2007; 67 (8): 3493–5.

Stone J, Robertson D, Houlston R. Immunohistochemistry for MSH2 and MHL1: a method for identifying mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 2001; 54 (6): 484–7.

McConechy MK, Talhouk A, Li-Chang HH, et al. Detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies by immunohistochemistry can effectively diagnose the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol

; 137 (2): 306–10.

Lopex-Larraza D, DeLucca JC, Bianchi NO. The kinetics of DNA damage by bleomycin in mammalian cells. Mutat Res

; 232 (1): 57– 61.

Laczmanska I, Gil J, Karpinski P, et al. Polymorphism in

nucleotide excision repair gene XPC correlates with bleomycininduced chromosomal aberrations. Environ Mol Mutagen 2007;

(8): 666–71.

Poletto M, Legrand AJ, Fletcher SC, et al. p53 coordinates

base excision repair to prevent genomic instability. Nucleic Acids

Res 2016; 44 (7): 3165–75.

Hwang BJ, Ford JM, Hanawalt PC, et al. Expression of

the p48 xeroderma pigmentosum gene is p53-dependent and is

involved in global genomic repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;

(2): 424–8.

Adimoolam S, Ford JM. p53 and DNA damage-inducible

expression of the xeroderma pigmentosum group C gene. Proc Natl

Acad Sci USA 2002; 99 (20): 12985–90.

Scherer SJ, Maier SM, Seifert M, et al. p53 and c-Jun

functionally synergize in the regulation of the DNA repair gene

hMSH2 in response to UV. J Biol Chem 2000; 275 (48): 37469–73.

Xu J, Morris GF. p53-mediated regulation of proliferating

cell nuclear antigen expression in cells exposed to ionizing radiation. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19 (1): 12–20.

Chen J, Sadowski I. Identification of the mismatch repair

genes PMS2 and MLH1 as p53 target genes by using serial analysis of

binding elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102 (13): 4813–8.

Shimodaira H, Yoshioka-Yamashita A, Kolodner RD, et al.

Interaction of mismatch repair protein PMS2 and the p53-related

transcription factor p73 in apoptosis response to cisplatin. Proc

Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100 (5): 2420–5.

Buchynska LG, Nesina IP. Expression of the cell cycle regulators p53, p21WAF1/CIP1 and p16INK4A in human endometrial adenocarcinoma. Exp Oncol 2006; 28 (2): 152–5.

Published

2016-12-22

How to Cite

Buchynska, L., Brieieva, O., Nesinа I., Glushchenko, N., Turchak, O., & Iurchenko, N. (2016). PECULIARITIES OF DNA REPAIR IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD LYMPHOCYTES AND TUMOR TISSUE OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER PATIENTS. Oncology, 18(4), 300–304. Retrieved from https://nasu-periodicals.org.ua/index.php/oncology/article/view/29008

Issue

Section

Original investigations