EVALUATION OF DOSE LOADS AND QUALITY OF IMAGES IN SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHIC STUDIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32471/oncology.2663-7928.t-21-2-2019-g.7236Keywords:
breast cancer, exposure doses, mammography, radiation risksAbstract
Aim: to study the doses of irradiation of patients during mammographic screening at various types of mammographs and to assess the quality of the image using test objects, as well as to determine the radiation risk of additional cases of breast cancer due to screening tests. Materials and methods: determination of the average absorbed dose for the mammary gland was carried out on the basis of the results of evaluation of the radiation output of the apparatus, taking into account the conditions of exposure, the thickness of the compressed mammary gland and using correction factors. The quality control of the mammographic image on the used various types of mammographs was performed using the universal mammographic phantom CIRS. An assessment of the efficacy dose was performed based on the mean of the absorbed dose, taking into account the weights weighing coefficients. Results: for compressed glandular thickness 20–40 mm, the values of absorbed doses exceeded the control level adopted in the European Union 1.4–2.0 times for all types of devices used. For the three groups of devices, the image quality criteria were not performed or performed in part, which may lead to a failure to fulfill the main task of mammography — visualization of small pathological structures that do not show themselves clinically and not visualized by other diagnostic methods. Conclusions: for the majority of devices used in Ukraine, the value of the absorbed dose for compressed mammary gland over 40 mm does not exceed the level adopted in the European Union. However, the quality of the image was unsatisfactory. In order to increase screening efficiency, it is necessary to implement an image quality assurance program that will reduce the number of uninformative images and cases of unreasonable exposure of patients.
References
Breast cancer: prevention and control [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http: //www.who.int/topics/cancer/breastcancer/ru/index1.html (in Ukrainian).
US Breast Cancer Statistics [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https: //www.breastcancer.org /symptoms/understand_bc/statistics
Cancer in Ukraine, 2016–2017. Morbidity, mortality, indicators of the oncology service activity. Bull Natl Cancer Register Ukr; Kyiv, 2018; 19: 136 p. (in Ukrainian).
Order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine No. 396. June 30, 2015 «On Approval and Implementation of Medical-Technological Documents for the Standardization of Medical Aid in Breast Cancer», Access Mode: http://mtd.dec.gov.ua/images/dodatki/2015 396 RMZ/ 2015_396_nakaz_RMZ.pdf (in Ukrainian).
European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Fourth Edition. Supplements. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union, 2013: 160 p.
IAEA 1381. Quality Assurance Programme for Film screen Mammography. Human Health Series № 2. Vienna, 2009. 158 p.
IAEA 1482. Quality Assurance Programme for Digital Mammography. Human Health Series № 17, Vienna, 2011. 195 p.
Gennaro G, Torresin A. Quality control in digital mammography: keep it simple. Med Phys Int J 2013; 1 (2): 528.
Avramova-Cholakova S, Lilkov G , Kaneva M, et al. Eight years of quality control in Bulgaria — impact on mammography practice. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2015; 165 (1–4): 359–62.
Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code of Practice. Technical Reports Series № 457; Vienna: IAEA, 2007. 357 p.
ICRP. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann. ICRP 2007; 37 (2–4) ICRP Publication 103. 344 p.
Suleiman ME, McEntee MF, Cartwright L, et al. Diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in New South Wales. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2017; 61 (1): 48–57.
Geeraert N, R. Klausz R, Muller S, et al. Breast characteristics and dosimetric data in X ray mammography — a large sample worldwide survey. Proc Int Conf Rad Protect Med «Setting the Scene for the Next Decade». Bonn, 2012. Access Mode: http://www.iaea.org/meetings
Standard EN 60601-2-45. Medical electrical equipment. Part 2-45. Additional safety and performance requirements for mammographic X-Ray equipment and stereotactic mammographic devices. Kyiv, 2016. 63 p. (in Ukrainian).
Standard EN 60601-1:2015. Medical electrical equipment. Part 1. General safety and performance requirements. Kyiv, 2015. 348 p. (in Ukrainian).
IAEA Pub 1775. Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation. Vienna: IAEA, 2018. 340 p.