MODERN VIEW ON THE STOCHASTIC EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION

Authors

  • V.F. Chekhun RE Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • E.A. Domina RE Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32471/oncology.2663-7928.t-24-1-2022-g.10339

Keywords:

biodosimetry, blood lymphocytes, carcinogenic effects, Chernobyl catastrophe, chromosome aberrations, liquidators, professionals, recovered COVID-19 patients

Abstract

Aim: to analyze the accumulated biodosimetric data and review the theoretical assumptions regarding the stochastic effects of irradiation in the range of small doses at the chromosomal level of highly radiosensitive human blood cells. Results: the authors examine the nature of the dose dependence of induced genetic damage in the blood cells of the liquidators of the Chernobyl disaster and medical workers whose activities are related to the sources of ionizing radiation. Particular attention is paid to the formation of stochastic effects in the range of small doses. It is widely accepted that the accumulation of chromosomal mutations in the cell population is potentially oncogenic, and small (above the background level) doses of ionizing radiation are carcinogenic. This means that in cases of high individual radiosensitivity, induced genetic disorders that occur in the somatic cells of professionals are able to create the preconditions for the emergence and development of radiogenic cancer. The authors pay special attention to the possible influence of SARS-CoV-2 virus on the radiosensitivity of the body of the patients recovered from COVID-19. The authors propose a hypothesis of mechanisms of increase in radiosensitivity based on the development of systemic long-term inflammation. This scenario of the evolution of radiosensitivity of the human body argues for a differentiated approach to predicting the occurrence of stochastic effects of ionizing radiation and requires further experimental testing using a set of relevant radiobiological indicators. Conclusion: analysis of the accumulated material and revision of theoretical assumptions in the field of radiobiology regarding stochastic (carcinogenic) effects of ionizing radiation in the range of small doses argues for a more in-depth study of the impact of individual (rather than general) radiosensitivity on their formation.

References

Arruda GA, Weber RS, Bruno AC, Pavoni JF. The risk of induced cancer and ishemic heart disease following low dose lung irradiation for COVID-19: estimation based on a virtual case. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97 (2): 120–5. doi: 10.1080/0955.3002.2021.1846818.

Domina EA. Chernobyl disaster and problems of low doses of radiation. Bulletin of Ukrainian Society of Geneticists and Breeders 2006; 4 (2): 164–73 (in Russian).

Fedorenko ZP. Cancer in Ukraine 2018–2019. Incidence, mortality, activities of oncological service. Bull National Cancer Registry of Ukraine. Kyiv, 2020. 116 p (in Ukrainian).

Medical consequences of the Chernobyl accident, the results of AIFEC pilot projects and relevant national programs. Geneva: WHO Scientific Report, 1996. 560 p.

Ilyin LA. The realities and myths of Chernobyl. Moscow: ALARA Ltd., 1994. 446 p (in Russian).

The Chernobyl disaster. Baryahtar GV. (eds). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1995. 560p (in Russian).

Galstyan IA, Nugis VYu, Torubarov FS, et al. The problem of establishing the connection between the developed cancer and radiation in the conditions of production. Medical radiology and radiation safety 2020; 65 (6): 76–82 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.12737/1024–6177–2020–65–6-76–82

Twenty-five years of the Chernobyl disaster. Security of the future: National report of Ukraine. Kyiv: КIM, 2011. 368 р (in Russian).

Domina EA. Radiation-induced cytological effects of somatic cells in patients with thyroid cancer. In: Thyroid cancer. Grinevich YuA, Chumak AA (eds). Kyiv: Zdorovya, 2011. 66–100 (in Russian).

Domina EA. Radiogenic cancer: epidemiology and primary prevention. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 2016. 196 p (in Russian).

Ivanov VK. Cancer morbidity and cancer mortality among participants in the liquidation of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident: assessment of radiation risks. Radiation biology. Radioecology 2006; 46 (2): 159–66 (in Russian).

Yarmonenko SP, Weinson AA. Human and animal radiobiology. Moscow: Higher School, 2004. 549 p (in Russian).

Domina EA, Pilinskaya MA, Petunin YuI, Klyushin DA. Radiation cytogenetics. Kyiv: Zdorovya, 2009. 368 p (in Russian).

Barilyak IR, Demina EA, Klyushin DA, et al. On the shape of dose curves of radiation-induced cytogenetic damage to human lymphocytes. Cytology and genetics 2001; 35 (4): 55–8 (in Russian).

Djomina E, Klyushin D, Petunin Y, Ganina K. Ocena wplywu promieniowania na czestosc zachorovan na nowotwory zlosliwe u likwidatorow skutkow katastrofy w Czarnobyli. Polsky Przeglad Radiologii 2001; 66 (2): 62–3.

Domina EA. The Chernobyl accident: early and long-term medical and biological effects. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT (Academic Publishing Deutschland), 2016. 106 p (in Russian).

Klyushin DA, Petunin YuI. Evidence-based medicine. Moscow: Dialectica, 2008. 316 p (in Russian).

Domina EA, Mikhailenko VM, Glavin OA, Makovetska LI. Identification of individuals with high individual radiosensitivity to protect their genome from exposure to background radiation doses. Guidelines. Kyiv: Ministry of Health of Ukraine, 2018. 30 p (in Ukrainian).

Domina EA, Druzyna MO, Ryabchenko NM. Individual human radiosensitivity. Kyiv: Logos, 2006. 126 p (in Ukrainian).

Alsbeih G. Chromosomal fragility syndrome and family history of radiosensitivity as indicators for radiotherapy dose modi­fication. Radiother Oncol 2003; 66 (3): 1075–83. doi: 10.1016/s0167–8140(02)00327–4

Domina EA, Mikhailenko VM. Rationale for the prevention of radiogenic cancer in professionals working in the field of ionizing radiation, with the involvement of biological methods. Oncology 2018; 20 (3). 177–84 (in Ukrainian).

Chekhun VF, Domina EA. Can SARS-COV-2 change individual radiation sensitivity of the patients recovered from COVID-19? (Experimental and theoretical background). Exp Oncol 2021; 43 (3): 277–80. doi: 10.32471/exp-oncology.2312–8852.vol-43-no-3.16554

Domina E. Possible effects of the exposure to ionizing radiation on the patients recovered from COVID-19. ScienceRise: Biological Science 2022; 1 (30): 4–7. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519–8025.2022.254881

WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard: URL: https://covid19.who.int/ date of request: 20.12.2020.

Vasin MV, Solov’ev VYu, Maltsev VN, et al. Primary radiation stress, inflammatory reaction and the mechanism of early postradiation reparative processes in irradiated tissues. Medical Radiolоgy and Radiation Safety 2018; 63 (6): 71–81 (in Russian).

Published

2026-01-13

How to Cite

Chekhun , V., & Domina , E. (2026). MODERN VIEW ON THE STOCHASTIC EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION. Oncology, 24(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.32471/oncology.2663-7928.t-24-1-2022-g.10339

Issue

Section

Opinion