PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF ESTROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR EXPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE I–II ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/oncology.2025.03.197Keywords:
endometrial cancer, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, survival, immunohistochemistry, disease stage, overall survivalAbstract
Summary. Aim: to assess the expression levels of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors in patients with different histological and molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer and to determine their association with survival outcomes. Object and methods: a prospective study was conducted involving 455 patients with stage I–II endometrial cancer who received treatment at the Prykarpattia Clinical Oncology Center of the Ivano- Frankivsk Regional Council from 2021 to 2024. The majority of patients were women over 60 years old — 291 (64.0%). Endometrioid adenocarcinoma was the predominant histological subtype and was diagnosed in 76.9% cases. Tumors with low and moderate differentiation (G1–2) were found in 57.4% patients. Results: imunohistochemical analysis revealed ER+/PR+ status in 55.8% patients, while ER–/PR– tumors were present in ISSN 3083-7154, 1562-1774 • ОНКОЛОГІЯ • Т. 27 • № 3 • 2025 2 0 1 Прогностичне значення експресії рецепторів естрогенів і прогестерону при раку ендометрію I–II стадії Одержано: 06.10.2025 Прийнято до друку: 12.11.2025 Опубліковано: 27.11.2025 29.7% cases. Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma was more common among hormone receptor-positive tumors ER+/PR+ (72.8%), whereas non-endometrioid carcinomas more frequently exhibited hormone receptor-negative status ER–/PR– (61.9%). Patients with ER+/PR+ tumors demonstrated the highest three-year overall survival (OS) rate of 93.7%, in the ER–/PR– group OS reached 71.9%. Conclusions. ER and PR expression serves as an important prognostic marker in patients with stage I–II endometrial cancer. A positive ER/PR status is associated with favorable clinicopathological characteristics and improved survival outcomes. Patients with ER+/PR+ tumors demonstrated better OS compared to those with ER–/PR– status.
References
Fedorenko ZP, Goulak LO, Gorokh YL, et al. Cancer in Ukraine, 2023–2024. Incidence, mortality, prevalence and other relevant statistics. Bulletin of the National Cancer Registry of Ukraine. Kyiv, 2025. 26.
Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2024. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74 (1): 12–49. https://doi.org/10. 3322/caac.21820.
Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, et al. ESMO-ESGO- ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016; 27 (1): 16–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv484.
Smith D, Stewart CJR, Clarke EM, et al. ER and PR ex- pression and survival after endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 148 (2): 258–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ygyno.2017.11.027.
Alodaini AA. Uterine mesenchymal tumors: Updates on pa- thology, molecular landscape, and therapeutics. Medicina (Kaunas) 2024; 60 (7): 1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ medicina60071085.
Guan J, Xie L, Luo X, et al. The prognostic significance of estrogen and progesterone receptors in grade I and II endo- metrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: hormone receptors in risk stratifi ation. J Gynecol Oncol 2019; 30 (1): e13. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e13.
Przewoźny S, Rogaliński J, de Mezer M, et al. Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression in endometrial cancer-an immunohistochemical assess- ment. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14 (3): 322. https://doi. org/10.3390/diagnostics14030322.
Galant N, Krawczyk P, Monist M, et al. Molecular clas- sification of endometrial cancer and its impact on therapy selection. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25 (11): 5893. https://doi. org/10.3390/ij 115893.
Zhou J, Song T, Gong S, et al. microRNA regulation of the expression of the estrogen receptor in endometrial cancer. Mol Med Rep 2010; 3 (3): 387–92. https://doi.org/10. 3892/mmr_00000269.
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Cibula D, et al. ESGO-ESTRO- ESP guidelines for the management of patients with en- dometrial carcinoma: update 2025. Lancet Oncol 2025; 26 (8): e423–e435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045- (25)00167-6.
Vrede SW, Van Weelden WJ, Bulten J, et al. Hormonal bio- markers remain prognostically relevant within the molecular subgroups in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2025; 192: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.028.