IMMUNOMODULATING EFFECT OF PROBIOTICS B. animalis SUBSP. Lactis BB-12 AND L. rhamnosus GG DURING TUMOR GROWTH

Authors

  • S.V. Gogol R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • P.A. Virych R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • N.I. Fedosova R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • N.L. Cheremshenko R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • K.D. Tarnopolska R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • I.M. Voyeykova R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • V.F. Chekhun R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/oncology.2025.02.129

Keywords:

tumour process, B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12, L. rhamnosus GG, macrophages, polarization state

Abstract

Summary. Aim: experimental study of the effect of B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and L. rhamnosus GG on the functional activity of macrophages (Mph) in intact animals and in animals with a model tumor process. Object and methods: studies were conducted on female BALB/c mice. Ehrlich adenocarcinoma was used as the experimental model. Two series of experiments were conducted: Series I: Probiotics (B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 or L. rhamnosus GG) were administered to intact animals. Series II: Probiotics were administered to animals with transplanted tumours. The probiotic administration scheme was the same for both series: for 28 days, daily, per os, 7×10⁵ CFU/mouse. The functional activity of macrophages (Mph) was determined based on the level of nitric oxide (NO) production, arginase (Arg) activity and the production of cytokines TNF-α and IL-10. In animals bearing the tumour model, the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and the phagocytic activity of Mph were also determined. The results were statistically processed using generally accepted variational statistical methods. Results: in the absence of a tumour process, the use of B. animalis led to a slight decrease in NO production (by 1.1 times) and a significant increase in Arg activity (by 1.8 times, p < 0.05). When L. rhamnosus GG was used, these indicators did not differ significantly from those observed in intact animals. Changes in the cytokines produced by Mph depended on the probiotic used: a significant increase in IL-10 levels and a decrease in TNF-α levels were noted in mice administered bifidobacteria, while cytokine production was maintained at intact control levels in mice treated with L. rhamnosus GG. Similar results were obtained when studying the effect of these probiotics on the polarisation state of Mph in animals bearing model tumours. Analysis of L-arginine metabolism, ROS levels, cytokine spectrum and phagocytic activity demonstrated that B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 promotes the polarization of Mph towards the M2 type, which is necessary to limit excessive inflammation but has pro-tumour properties. The application of L. rhamnosus GG had the opposite effect, with long-term preservation of M1 polarization noted even at an advanced stage of tumour growth. This is important for maintaining the antitumour immune response. Conclusion: the possibility of targeted change in the polarization state and, accordingly, the functional properties of macrophages, using probiotics with predetermined properties may be useful in the treatment of patients with various pathological conditions.

References

Thursby E, Juge N. Introduction to the human gut micro-biota. Biochem J 2017; 474 (11): 1823–36. https://doi.org/ 10.1042/BCJ20160510.

Mazziotta C, Tognon M, Martini F, et al. Probiotics mechanism of action on immune cells and benefi ial eff on human health. Cells 2023; 12 (1): 184. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/cells12010184.

Faghfoori Z, Faghfoori MH, Saber A, et al. Anticancer effects of bifidobacteria on colon cancer cell lines. Cancer Cell Int 2021; 21 (1): 258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021- 01971-3.

Flach J, van der Waal MB, Kardinaal AFM, et al. Probiotic research priorities for the healthy adult population: a review on the health benefi of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifi terium animalis subspecies lactis BB-12. Cogent Food Agriculture 2018; 4: 1452839. https://doi.org/10.108 0/23311932.2018.1452839.

Yao S, Zhao Z, Wang W, Liu X. Bifi terium longum: protection against inflammatory bowel disease. J Immunol Res 2021; 2021: e8030297. 1 https://doi.org/0.1155/ 2021/8030297.

Cristofori F, Dargenio VN, Dargenio C, et al. Anti-infl - matory and immunomodulatory effects of probiotics in gut infl tion: A door to the body. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 578386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fi 1.578386.

Rabe H, Lundell A-C, Sjöberg F, et al. Neonatal gut colonization by Bifi terium is associated with higher childhood cytokine responses. Gut Microbes 2020; 12 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2020.1847628.

Wu B-B, Yang Y, Xu X, Wang W-P. Effects of Bifidobacterium supplementation on intestinal microbiota composition and the immune response in healthy infants. World J Pediatr 2016; 12 (2): 177–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-015- 0025-3.

Zhang DY, Pan ZY, Yu XK, et al. Bifi terium lactis BB- 12 attenuates macrophage aging induced by D-galactose and promotes M2 macrophage polarization. J Immunol Res 2019; 2019: 4657928. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/ 4657928.

Fong FLY, Kirjavainen PV, El-Nezami H. Immunomodula- tion of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG)-derived soluble factors on antigen-presenting cells of healthy blood donors. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 22845. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep 22845.

Burns P, Alard J, Hrdý J, et al. Spray-drying process preserves the protective capacity of a breast milk-derived Bifi terium lactis strain on acute and chronic colitis in mice. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 43211. https://doi.org/10.1038/ srep43211.

Habil N, Al-Murrani W, Beal J, Foey AD. Probiotic bacterial strains differentially modulate macrophage cytokine production in a strain-dependent and cell subset-specific manner. Benefi ial Microbes 2011; 2 (4): 283–93. https:// doi.org/10.3920/BM2011.0027.

Al-Najjar MAA, Abdulrazzaq SB, Alzaghari LF, et al. Evaluation of immunomodulatory potential of probiotic conditioned medium on murine macrophages. Sci Rep 2024; 14: 7126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56622-0.

Guo N, Lv LL. Mechanistic insights into the role of probio- tics in modulating immune cells in ulcerative colitis. Immun Inflamm Dis 2023; 11 (10): e1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/ iid3.1045.

Wang Y, Liu H, Zhao J. Macrophage polarization induced by probiotic bacteria: a concise review. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2020; 12 (3): 798–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12602-019-09612-y.

European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientifi Purposes ETS 123. Protection of Vertebrate Animals, 18.III.1986. 48. https://norecopa.no/media/2iydns5h/ets-123-original. pdf.

Radulski DR, Stipp MC, Galindo CM, Acco A. Features and applications of Ehrlich tumor model in cancer studies: a literature review. Transl Breast Cancer Res 2023; 4: 22. https://doi.org/10.21037/tbcr-23-32.

Van de Loosdrecht AA, Beelen RH, Ossenkoppele GJ, et al. A tetrazolium-based colorimetric MTT assay to quantitate human monocyte mediated cytotoxicity against leukemic cells from cell lines and patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Immunol Methods 1994; 174: 311–20.

Reiner NE. Methods in molecular biology. Macrophages and dendritic cells. Methods and protocols. Preface. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 531: v-vi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 59745-396-7.

Cai Q, Li Y, Pei G. Polysaccharides from Ganoderma lu- cidum attenuate microglia-mediated neuroinfl tion and modulate microglial phagocytosis and behavioural response. J Neuroinfl tion 2017; 14 (1): 63. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0839-0.

Konopelnuk VI, Kompanets IV, Svyatetska VM, et al. Functional polarization of macrophages of rats with progeste- rone-induced obesity treated with melanin from the Antarctic yeast Nadsoniella nigra. Regul Mech Biosyst 2019; 10 (4): 538–43. https://doi.org/10.15421/021979.

Chen S, Saeed AF, Liu, Q, et al. Macrophages in immunoreg- ulation and therapeutics. Sig Transduct Target Ther 2023; 8 (1): 207. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01452-1.

Karadima E, Chavakis T, Alexaki VI. Arginine metabolism in myeloid cells in health and disease. Semin Immuno- pathol 2025; 47 (1): 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281- 025-01038-9.

Mosser DM, Hamidzadeh K, Goncalves R. Macrophages and the maintenance of homeostasis. Cell Mol Immunol 2021; 18 (3): 579–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020- 00541-3.

Zhao C, Chen H, Liang H, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum

RS-09 induces M1-type macrophage immunity against Salmonella Typhimurium Challenge via the TLR2/NF-κB signalling pathway. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13: 832245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.832245.

Lecoultre M, Dutoit V, Walker PR. Phagocytic function of tumor-associated macrophages as a key determinant of tumor progression control: a review. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8 (2): e001408. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020- 001408.

Wang L, Hu Z, Zhang W, et al. Promoting macrophage phagocytosis of cancer cells for eff ive cancer immunotherapy. Biochem Pharmacol 2025; 232: 116712. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116712.

Published

2025-08-11

How to Cite

Gogol, S., Virych, P., Fedosova, N., Cheremshenko, N., Tarnopolska, K., Voyeykova, I., & Chekhun, V. (2025). IMMUNOMODULATING EFFECT OF PROBIOTICS B. animalis SUBSP. Lactis BB-12 AND L. rhamnosus GG DURING TUMOR GROWTH. Oncology, 27(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.15407/oncology.2025.02.129

Issue

Section

Original investigations