EXPERT ASSESSMENT TOOL AS THE DEFINITION INSTRUMENT OF COMMON PROBLEMS IN REGIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2016.03.017Keywords:
peer review, inter-regional cooperation, the organizational form of interregional co-operation, SWOT-analysis of the regional development strategies, the value and number of parametersAbstract
The paper solved applied problems, namely, expert evaluation carried out on the basis of which the definition of the problem and the direction of inter-regional cooperation of Sumy, Poltava, Kharkov and the Dnipropetrovs’k regions. The expediency of using peer review. It proved a major advantage of the expert evaluation method which is based in the fact that professionals can use not only information based on statistical indicators of time, but also irregular, one-time information of a qualitative nature. It was found that the peer review contributes to the objective vision of regional problems, in turn, makes it possible to quickly and carefully to make management decisions.
References
Byelyen’kyy P.Yu. and Mikula N.А. (2011), Formuvannya ta rozvytok systemy mizhrehional’noho ta transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva v Ukrayini [Formation and development of interregional and cross-border cooperation in Ukraine], Rehional’na ekonomika, vol. 3, рр. 61-73.
Babinova O.О. (2011), Mіzhregіonal’ne spіvrobіtnictvo: zmіst, formi, rol’ ta problemi realіzacії v Ukraїnі [Interregional cooperation: content, form, role and problems of implementation in Ukraine], Derzhavne upravlinnya ta mistseve samovryaduvannya, vol. 4 (11), pp. 189-197.
Budkin V.S. (1993), Prykordonne spivrobitnytstvo v systemi adaptatsiyi ekonomiky Ukrayiny do yevropeys’koho hospodars’koho prostoru [Cross-border cooperation in the system of adaptation of the Ukrainian economy to the European economic space], Problemy spivrobitnytstva prykordonnykh terytoriy Ukrayiny i Pol’shchi, vol. 3, рр. 169-179.
Mikula N.A., Matvyeyev Ye.E., and Tolkovanov V.V. (2012), Konverhentsiya rehioniv u transkordonnomu prostori, [Convergence regions in the cross-border area], In-t rehional’nykh doslidzhen’ NAN Ukrayiny; L’vivs’kyy rehional’nyy instytut derzhavnoho upravlinnya Nats. Akademiyi derzh. up-nya pry Prezydentovi Ukrayiny, L’viv, Ukraine.
Mikula N.A., and Matvyeyev Ye.E. (2011), Rozvytok novykh form transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva [The development of new forms of cross-border cooperation], Ekonomist, vol. 5, рр. 20-24.
Omarov A.E. (2009), Derzhavn erehulyuvannya mizh rehional’noho spivrobitnytstva v ekonomichniy sferi [State regulation of inter-regional cooperation in the economic sphere] PhD. diss. Economy. Sciences. Kharkov Regional Institute of Public Administration of the National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Pavlikha N.V. and Marchuk Yu.V. (2014), Kontseptual’ni zasady upravlinnya proektamy stalykh prostorovykh system [Conceptual project management through continuous spatial systems], Upravlinnya rozvytkom skladnykh system, vol. 18. рр. 74-79.
Skibits’kyy O.M., Matveev V.V. and Skibits’ka L.I. (2011) Orhanizatsiya biznesu. Menedzhment pidpryyemnyts’koyi diyal’nosti. [Business Organization. Management of business], Kondor, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Storonyans’ka I.Z. (2010), Rehional’nyy rozvytok Ukrayiny: problemy intehratsiyi ta konverhentsiyi [Regional development of Ukraine: problems of integration and convergence], IRD NAN Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine.
Kish Ye. (2006), Problemy transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva Ukrayiny i Yevrosoyuzu [The problems of cross-bor der cooperation between Ukraine and the EU], Ukrayins’kyy tsentr politychnoho menedzhmentu, vol. 5. рр. 131-144.
Studennikov I. (2000), Transkordonne spivrobitnytstvo ta yoho mistse v rehional’nom urozvytku [Cross-border cooperation and its place inregional development], Lohos, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Beskrovnyy Y.M. (2012), Analyz al’ternatyv y vybor dyahnostycheskykh hypotez. Chast’ I. Pravylo Bayesa y metody teoryy prynyatyya reshenyy Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prykladnykh y fundamental’nykh yssledovanyy [Analysis of alternatives and the selection of diagnostic hypotheses. Part I. Rule Bayes methods and decision theory], Modern high technologies, vol. 2. рр. 33-40.
Titarenko H.B., and Korin’ko M.D. (2010), Vybir ekspertiv u doslidzhennyakh metodolohiyi ta orhanizatsiyi bukh halters’koho obliku, kontrolyu ta analizu [The choice of experts in research methodology and organization of accounting, control and analysis], Aktual’ni problemy ekonomiky, vol. 7 (109), рр. 270 — 277.
Arapov S.M., and Arapova I.P. (2000), Elementy otsinky ekspertnykh rishen’ [Elements of assessment expert so lutions], Vinnyts’kyy derzh. tekhnichnyy un-t, Vinnytsya, Ukraine.
Vasylenko V.N. (2016), Mnohomernost’ parametrov rehyona: terrytoryy, systemy, prostranstva [Multidimensional parameter in the region: the territory, the system space], Yuho-Vostok, Druzhkovka, Ukraine.
