I’M A SHAME TO BE A LAWYER!

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2018.01.163

Keywords:

development of law, legislation, lawyer, Economic Code, self-organization, hyperbolization of rights and freedoms

Abstract

The article is an attempt to give impetus to the ongoing discussion about the further development of the domestic legal system and scientific legal thought. The emphasis is on the prospects of expanding the self-organization of economic and other entities, narrowing its legal regulation. It is proposed to involve the maximum number of theoreticians and practitioners in discussing the possibility of modernizing Ukraine’s legal system, taking into account the qualitative and quantitative increase in the achievements of scientific and technological progress, the development of new social relations that have not yet been affected by legal influence. In particular, it is proposed to introduce the concept of the Charter of economic activity into circulation, which, as it is supposed, can shorten the time for introducing changes to such a normative act, to allow the maximum to reach a compromise between business entities with respect to the system of legal support for the economy of the country. The author proves that this way of modernizing the legal system is a kind of “healthy” lobbying of socially useful interests, but at the same time it is necessary to clearly fix the rules of such activity with what, as shown, the domestic legislator could not cope. It also touches upon a wide range of philosophical and legal issues in the social life of people, their various relationships as prerequisites for the emergence of subsequent legal ordering and the direction of the relevant relations in a socially useful channel. The issue of the future of the profession of a lawyer as a promising area for further research in the context of the same scientific and technological progress is touched upon.

References

Proekt Zakonu pro yurydychnu (pravnychu) osvitu i zahalnyi dostup do pravnychoi profesii vid 28.09.2017 reiestr. No. 7147. Ofitsiinyi sait Verkhovnoi RadyUkrainy.URL: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=62613 [in Ukrainian].

Proekt Zakonu pro yurydychnu osvitu ta yurydychnu (pravnychu) profesiiu vid 17.10.2017 reiestr. No. 7147-1. Ofitsiinyi sait Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. URL: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=62728 [in Ukrainian].

Illarionov O.Yu. Kasta pravnykiv, abo yurysty — het! LIHA.Blohy. 11.10.2017. URL: http://blog.liga.net/user/aillarionov/article/28390.aspx [in Ukrainian].

Illarionov O.Yu. Kasta pravnykiv, abo Yurysty — het! Yurydychnyi visnyk Ukrainy. 2017. No. 43/44 (27 zhovtnia — 9 lystopada): 8 [in Ukrainian].

Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. M.: Mysl’, 1994. P. 432 [in Russian].

Shemshuchenko Yu.S. Shcho ye pravo? Antolohiia ukrainskoi yurydychnoi dumky v 10 t. Yurydychna nauka nezalezhnoi Ukrainy. K.: Vydavnychyi Dim “Iurydychna knyha”, 2005. T. 10. P. 30, 46 [in Ukrainian].

Lanier M., Henry S. Essential criminology. 2nd ed. Boulder; Colorado, 2004. P. 321-324.

Rozovskij B.G. Pravo imet’ pravo. Ekonomika ta pravo. 2017. No. 1 (46): 113-125 [in Russian].

Al’varo Hil’-Robles. Vlast’ i moral’. Obshhaja tetrad’. Vestnik Moskovskoj shkoly grazhdanskogo prosveshhenija. 2013. No. 2 (62): 22—28 [in Russian].

Rozovskij B.G. Kupite izmenenie v zakone! Ekonomika ta pravo. 2015. No. 2 (41): 85—91 [in Russian].

Mishutin S. Kakie zakony v Ukraine samye nedejstvujushhie? Argumenty i fakty v Ukraine. 2007. No. 7 (549). P. 10 [in Russian].

Castles A.C. An Australian legal history. LawBook Co: Sydney, 1982.

Shandor Petefi. Sobr. soch. v 3-h tomah. Per. s veng. Budapesht: Korvina, 1979. Iss. 3. P. 44 [in Russian].

Zghalat-Lozynska L.O. Napriamy podalannia kryzy systemy sotsialno-trudovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini. Ekonomika ta pravo. 2017. No. 1 (46): 87—91 [in Ukrainian].

Juzhanina N. Jekonomikoj zanimat’sja nekomu. Argumenty i Fakty. 04.04.2018. No. 14 [in Russian].

Gubitel’naja jekonomija. Sjuzhet na kanale “Mir-24”. 01.04.2018. URL: https://mir24.tv/articles/16298812/gubitelnayaekonomiya [in Russian].

Pravovoj monitoring. Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.: Jurisprudencija, 2009 [in Russian].

Sorokin V.G. Gosudarstvennost’ perehodnogo perioda: teoreticheskie voprosy. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 1999 [in Russian].

Lukian. Sochinenija. V dvuh tomah. Pod obshh. red. A.I. Zajceva. [Na osnove izdanija 1935 goda]. SPb.: Aletejja, 2001. T. 1 [in Russian].

Agushevich M.A. O processual’noj i poznavatel’noj prirode vyvodov jeksperta v forme “Ne predstavilos’ vozmozhnym”. Vostok-Zapad: partnerstvo sudebnoj jekspertize. Aktual’nye voprosy teorii i praktiki sudebnoj jekspertizy: Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (g. Almaty, 6 nojabrja 2014 g.). Astana, 2014. 332 s. URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31629086#pos=220;-102 [in Russian].

Vasil’kevich K. Shtraf za userdie. 2000. 2013. No. 41 (672). V. 7 [in Russian].

Romanov A.K. Pravovaja sistema Anglii: Ucheb. posobie. M.: Delo, 2000 [in Russian].

Sobchak A.A. Hozhdenie vo vlast’. Rasskaz o rozhdenii parlamenta. M.: Novosti, 1991 [in Russian].

Wallerstein J., Wyle C. Our Law-Abiding Law-Breakers. Probation. 1947. March — April. P. 107—112.

Shul’gin V.V. Opyt Lenina. Nash sovremennik. 1997. No. 11: 138—175 [in Russian].

Brynceva G. Provokacija bedy. Zheleznodorozhniki trebujut blokirovat’ “zaceperskie” sajty bez suda. Rossijskaja gazeta. Federal’nyj vypusk. 2014. No. 205 (6477). URL: https://rg.ru/2014/09/10/provokacia.html [in Russian].

Sistematicheskaja oshibka vyzhivshego. Post v social’noj seti «Livejournal». 28.02.2017. URL: https://minskblog.livejournal.com/65350.html [in Russian].

Loginov O. Kazni zhivotnyh. Vse o prestupnosti i kriminale:Web-site. URL: http://www.all-crime.ru/kazni/kazni-jivotnikh.htm [in Russian].

Published

2024-10-09

How to Cite

Rozovskiy, B. (2024). I’M A SHAME TO BE A LAWYER!. Economics and Law, 49(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2018.01.163