ON A LEGAL REGIME OF THE PERMISSIVE DOCUMENTS IN A SPHERE OF CITY PLANNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2018.03.017Keywords:
permit for building works, building permits, protection of cultural heritage, building, reconciliations in a buildingAbstract
Quality of a legislation in a sphere of city planning is a serious reason for investors to make decision about an investing in a building sector of economy of any country. A status of construction market in Ukraine is not sustainable as a result of some causes. The main task of the article is to observe completeness and quality of a legal regulation of permissive relations in a sphere of town planning. Author defined a list of appropriate permissive documents and analyzed their legal regime. There are such building permits as permit for building works, notifications about beginning of building works and beginning of preparing works, permit for building of constructions and objects of road service, gasoline stations, reconciliation of projects for building, reconstruction and repairing of roads, railway moves, complexes of road service and other constructions, reconciliation of programs and projects of architectural, building and landscape converting, earthen works on national monuments, their territories, in their protecting territories, in their security zones and also programs and projects whose realization may affect objects of cultural heritage and permit for building in a free custom zone. The legal regime of these documents (excluding permit for building works) are unsatisfactory. A legislation has only some common norms about their legal regime. So the author proposed possible trends of an improvement of permissive legislation in a sphere of city planning. The legal regulation of such permissive relations need to be more detailed for protection public interests. A serious problem is a disintegration of norms about permissive relations in a sphere of protection of cultural heritage and such norms in a legislation about town planning. Permissive relations between organs of protection of cultural heritage and customer of building works are not regulated in appropriate way in Ukrainian legislation. Author analyzed coordination of such norms and made some proposals for their improvement.
References
Oliukha V.H. Hospodarsko-pravovi zasoby optymizatsii kapitalnoho budivnytstva u suchasnii Ukraini. Avtoref. dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. Odesa: Nats. un-t «Odes. yuryd. akad.», 2015. 36 p. [in Ukrainian].
Cellmer R., Jasinski J. Analysis of housing development activity in Poland from 2005 — 2014. Real Estate Management and Valuation. 2016. Vol. 24. No. 4. P. 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2016-0029
Pavlovski H. Shchodo problem rozvytku diialnosti pidpryiemstv budivelnoi sfery v Ukraini. Mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal «Internauka». 2017. No. 3 (25). T. 2. P. 124-135 [in Ukrainian].
Yanitskyi A. Zaderei: «Problemu s ypotekoi ne reshyt dazhe rezkoe snyzhenye stavok». URL: https://lb.ua/economics/2018/07/20/403223_zaderey_problemu_ipotekoy.html [in Ukrainian].
Serdiuk T.V., Lavrovska I.V. Dozvilni protsesy v budivnytstvi yak chynnyk nedoskonalosti instytutsiinoho seredovyshcha. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini. 2013. No. 9 (148). P. 120-125 [in Ukrainian].
Slonchak V.V. Administratyvno-pravovi vidnosyny u sferi budivnytstva v umovakh detsentralizatsii vlady. Avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Kyiv: Nats. un-t bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy, 2017. 17 p. [in Ukrainian].
Rezvorovych K.R. Administratyvno-pravove zabezpechennia realizatsii derzhavnoi polityky u sferi budivnytstva. Avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Kyiv: Nats. akad. vnutr. sprav, 2016. 21 p. [in Ukrainian].
Vikhrov O. Orhanizatsiino-hospodarski pravovidnosyny u haluzi budivelnoi diialnosti. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2008. No. 10. P. 34-38 [in Ukrainian].
Kvasnitska O.O. Spivvidnoshennia pryvatnoho ta publichnoho interesu u sferi budivnytstva. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. 2011. No. 1. P. 87-90 [in Ukrainian].
Vikhrov O.P. Orhanizatsiino-hospodarski pravovidnosyny. Kyiv: Slovo, 2008. 512 p. [in Ukrainian].
Hrytsenko H.M. Pravove rehuliuvannia kapitalnoho budivnytstva za derzhavni koshty. Avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. Donetsk: NAN Ukrainy ; In-t ekon.-prav. doslidzh., 2011. 17 p. [in Ukrainian].
Apanasenko K.I. Klasyfikatsiia dokumentiv dozvilnoho kharakteru i prav za nymy. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Seriia «Iurydychni nauky». 2018. No. 1 (106). P. 58-65 [in Ukrainian].
Biznes-seredovyshche v Ukraini — 2007: Zvit. Mizhnarodna finansova korporatsiia v ramkakh Proektu «Rozvytok pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini». Kyiv, 2007. 56 p. [in Ukrainian].
Liapin D.V., Pozharskyi D.Iu. Ukraina na shliakhu do Yevropy: dosvid realizatsii reform u sferi pidpryiemnytstva. Kyiv: Ukrainska Akademiia Yevropeiskoi Intehratsii, Instytut Konkurentnoho Suspilstva, 2007. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].
Czemplik A. Inspection of construction works according to Polish construction law, 2nd International Conference on Innovative Materials, Structures and Technologies, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2015. P. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/96/1/012057
Skrypnychuk T.V. Rehuliatorni mekhanizmy u sferi budivnytstva: mizhnarodnyi dosvid dlia Ukrainy. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Ekonomika ta pidpryiemnytstvo. 2010. No. 4. P. 175-181 [in Ukrainian].
Dozvilni protsedury u budivnytstvi: zakonodavstvo Ukrainy ta mizhnarodnyi dosvid. Ahentstvo SShA z mizhnarodnoho rozvytku (USAID) ta Korporatsiia «Vyklyky tysiacholittia» (MSS) v ramkakh Proektu spryiannia torhivli ta investytsiiam USAID/TIBA. 2007. 78 p. [in Ukrainian].
Overview of the Court’s case-law from 1 January to 15 June 2016. URL: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Short_Survey_January_June_2016_ENG.pdf
Keywords
