OVERHEATING OF SECTORAL LEGAL SCIENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2019.01.087Keywords:
science, sectoral legal science, overheating of sectoral legal science, Economic law science, Civil law scienceAbstract
The article discusses the negative impact of Civil law science on the legal system of Ukraine due to significant overheating of this industrial science, unreasonable expansion of its subject, constant search for novelty in order to "capture" all new and new areas of regulation. A deliberate and planned denial by individual representatives of Civil law science of the concept of Economic law and the Economic Code of Ukraine as a system-forming act regarding the entire array of economic legislation is noted. Concrete examples of the destructive influence of Civil law on legislative work, and, as a result, on law enforcement are given. The further impossibility of including new and new norms in the current Civil Code of Ukraine is substantiated, the possibility of its “disintegration" into composite institutions and their registration into separate codified regulations is predicted. The prerequisites for the start of work on the recodification of economic and civil legislation, the adoption of the Economic and Civil Code in new versions are investigated. Based on the experience of the European Union, the impossibility of merely civil-law regulation of contractual relations is shown, as well as the creation of the Unified Civil Code of the European Union in the foreseeable future. It is concluded that economic legislation has the greatest ability to harmonize and contributes to the construction of a single market, the development of uniform harmonized rules of management. The basis for this is the objectivity of the laws of economics, which know no boundaries. Unlike economic legislation, civil legislation reflects the regulation of relations that have historically developed between citizens in a single country, and it is not so susceptible to unification even as a result of globalization processes. At the same time, transferring the experience of other countries in the regulation of civil relations is detrimental to the self-identification of the People of Ukraine and may serve as an additional factor in strengthening threats to national security and sovereignty.
References
Realizatsiia intehratsiinoho vyboru Ukrainy: pravovi problemy, mozhlyvi ryzyky ta naslidky: broshura. Za red. O.O. Ashurkova. Donetsk, 2013. 186 p. [in Ukrainian].
Illarionov A.Yu. Voennaja i integracionnaja dominanty vyborov 2018 v RF. Vilne slovo. 23.09.2017. URL: http://vilneslovo.com/военная-и-интеграционная-доминанты-в/ [in Russian].
Ashurkov O.O., Dutov M.M., Illarionov O.Yu. Riven intehratsii Ukrainy z YeS i Mytnym soiuzom z ohliadu na stan adaptatsii vitchyznianoho zakonodavstva. Ekonomika ta pravo. 2013. No. 2 (36). P. 138-148 [in Ukrainian].
Illarionov A.Yu. O vklade v nauku i o procentah po jetomu vkladu (o tvorcheskom nasledii akademika NAN Ukrainy V.K. Mamutova). Ekonomіka ta pravo. 2018. No. 1 (49). P. 3-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2018.01.003 [in Russian].
Glava komiteta VR po voprosam jekonomicheskoj politiki: Osnovnoe – chtoby vse byli ravny pered zakonom. Sajt informacionnogo agentstva "InterFaks-Ukraina". 26.04.2016. URL: http://interfax.com.ua/news/interview/340168.html [in Russian].
Illarionov A.Yu. Politiko-pravovye aspekty modernizacii hozjajstvennogo zakonodatel’stva. Ch.1. Chernigov: Desna Poligraf, 2017. 160 p. [in Russian].
Klistorin V.I. Jevoljucija institutov nauki i obrazovanija. Pochemu my delaem to, chto delaem. Vserossijskij je konomicheskij zhurnal "JeKO". 2017. No. 5. P. 172-185 [in Russian].
Koncepcija modernizacii hozjajstvennogo zakonodatel’stva na baze Hozjajstvennogo kodeksa Ukrainy (proekt). Ekonomika ta pravo. 2006. No. 2. P. 5-16 [in Russian].
Sarbash S.V. Krupnyj biznes pytaetsja vpihnut’ v GK dazhe to, chto v nego dejstvitel’no slozhno vstroit’. Zhurnal "Zakon". 2012. No. 1. P. 8–18 [in Russian].
Bobkova A.H., Ashurkov O.O. Komentar do proektu Zakonu Ukrainy "Pro osnovni zasady hospodarskoi diialnosti". Ekonomika ta pravo. 2008. No. 2. P. 108-112 [in Ukrainian].
Spivakovskij V. Budushhee uzhe nastupilo. Strana prosypaetsja. Internet-resurs "Obozrevatel’". 09.07.2017. URL: https://www.obozrevatel.com/society/85134-buduschee-uzhe-nastupilo--strana-prosyipaetsya.htm [in Russian].
Romovska Z.V. Vidkrytyi lyst yurydychnii hromadskosti Ukrainy. Ekonomika ta pravo. 2002. No. 2. P. 131-135 [in Ukrainian].
Mamutov V.K. Pochemu zaderzhivaetsja vvedenie Hozjajstvennogo i Grazhdanskogo kodeksov. Ekonomіka ta pravo. 2002. No. 2. P. 135-138 [in Russian].
Znamenskij G.L. Blesk i nishheta sovremennoj civilistiki. Ekonomika ta pravo. 2004. No. 2. P. 5-10 [in Russian].
Znamenskij G.L. Blesk i nishheta sovremennoj civilistiki. Ekonomіka ta pravo. 2005. No. 1. P. 24-32 [in Russian].
Znamenskij G.L. Blesk i nishheta sovremennoj civilistiki. Ekonomika ta pravo. 2005. No. 2. P. 5-15 [in Russian].
Melnyk R. Predmet administratyvnoho prava. Pravo Ukrainy. 2018. No. 3. P. 159-182 [in Ukrainian].
Ustymenko V.A., Mamutov V.K., Kremenovskaja I.V. Otzyv na monografiju E.V. Petrova "Fenomenologija ad ministrativno-hozjajstvennogo prava Ukrainy". Ekonomika ta pravo. 2013. No. 3 (37). P. 159-162 [in Russian].
Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Akademichnyi kurs: Pidruch.: U dvokh tomakh: Tom 1. Zahalna chastyna. Red. kolehiia: V.B. Aver`ianov (hol. red.). K.: Vydavnytstvo "Iurydychna dumka", 2004. 586 p. [in Ukrainian].
Illarionov O.Yu. Poniattia ta vydy orhanizatsiino-hospodarskykh vidnosyn: okremi problemy. Problemy hospodarskoho prava i metodyka yoho vykladannia: Zb. nauk. pr. Redkol.: Mamutov V.K. (vidp. red.) ta in. Donetsk: TOV "Iuho-Vostok, LTD", 2006. P. 161–170 [in Ukrainian].
Klistorin V.I. K stoletiju padenija Zapada i zakata Evropy. Vserossijskij jekonomicheskij zhurnal "JeKO". 2017. No. 7. P. 162-177 [in Russian].
Rozovskij B.G. Mne stydno byt’ juristom! Ekonomіka ta pravo. 2018. No. 1. P. 163-183. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2018.01.163 [in Russian].
Astahova M.A. Oborot v grazhdanskom prave: ponjatie, struktura, raznovidnosti. Bjulleten’ notarial’noj praktiki. 2006. No. 4. P. 2-6 [in Russian].
Belov V.A. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshhaja chast’ : uchebnik. T. ІІ : Lica, blaga, fakty. Moscow : Jurajt, 2011. 1093 p. [in Russian].
Bratus' S.N. O ponjatii grazhdanskogo oborota v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave (doklad na zasedanii Sektora grazhdanskogo prava Vsesojuznogo instituta juridicheskih nauk). Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1949. No. 11. P. 71. [in Russian].
Vinichenko Ju.V. O sootnoshenii grazhdanskogo i jekonomicheskogo oborota. Izvestija Irkutskoj gosudarstvennoj jekonomicheskoj akademii. 2015. Iss. 25. No. 5. P. 879–887 [in Russian].
Mozolin V.P. O makro- i mikropravovom regulirovanii kompleksnyh imushhestvennyh otnoshenij v sfere jekonomiki. V kn. : Novoe v grazhdanskom zakonodatel’stve: balans chastnyh i publichnyh interesov : materialy dlja VII Ezhegodnyh nauchnyh chtenijah pamjati professora S.N. Bratusja. Otv. red. N.G. Doronina. Moscow : Jurisprudencija, 2012. P. 9-24 [in Russian].
Petrushkin V.A. Sistemnyj analiz grazhdansko-pravovoj modeli oborota nedvizhimosti : problemy teorii i praktiki : dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk : 12.00.03. Moscow 2014. 417 p. [in Russian].
Lavruhin A.N. Nekotorye osobennosti pravovogo regulirovanija kommercheskoj (torgovoj) dejatel’nosti v Rossii. Vestnik MGOU. Serija "Jurisprudencija". 2014. No. 3. P. 43-48 [in Russian].
Jurzin N.P. Koncepcija grazhdanskih organizacionno-pravovyh otnoshenij: istoricheskij aspekt. Akademicheskij juridicheskij zhurnal. 2014. No. 4 (58). P. 60-65 [in Russian].
Krasavchikov O.A. K voprosu o predmete regulirovanija i funkcijah zakona o nauchno-tehnicheskom tvorchestve. Voprosy izobretatel’stva. 1981. No. 1. P. 13-17 [in Russian].
Krasavchikov O.A. Struktura predmeta grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovanija socialisticheskih obshhestvennyh otnoshenij. V kn. : Teoreticheskie problemy grazhdanskogo prava : sb. uchen. tr. Iss. 13. Sverdlovsk, 1970. P. 5-21 [in Russian].
Safonova E.Ju. Osobennosti konstrukcii organizacionnyh dogovorov. Juridicheskaja nauka. 2012. No. 2. P. 81-83 [in Russian].
Safonova E.Ju. Mesto i rol’ organizacionnyh dogovorov v sisteme grazhdansko-pravovyh dogovorov. Juridicheskaja nauka. 2012. No. 3. P. 48-51 [in Russian].
Vaseva N.V. Imushhestvennye i organizacionnye grazhdansko-pravovye dogovory. Grazhdansko-pravovoj dogovor i ego funkcii : mezhvuz. sb. nauchnyh trudov. Sverdlovsk, 1980 [in Russian].
Avdeenkova M.P. Kodifikacija zakonodatel’stva Rossii: problemy i perspektivy. Ezhegodnik istorii prava i pravovedenija. 2002. Iss. 3. P. 91-92 [in Russian].
Rahmanina T.N. Aktual’nye voprosy kodifikacii rossijskogo zakonodatel’stva. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2008. No. 4. P. 30-39 [in Russian].
Illarionov O.Yu. Rekodyfikatsiia hospodarskoho zakonodavstva: problemy ta napriamy. V. zb.: Aktualni problemy hospodarskoho prava i hospodarskoho protsesu : Materialy kruhloho stolu (m. Kyiv, 9 lystopada 2018 r.). Kyiv : Lira-K, 2018. 260 p. [in Ukrainian].
Illarionov O.Yu. "Ievropeiskyi dosvid" kodyfikatsii hospodarskoho zakonodavstva. Yurydychnyi visnyk Ukrainy. No. 3. 22–28 sichnia 2016 r. P. 14 (pochatok) [in Ukrainian].
Illarionov O.Yu. "Ievropeiskyi dosvid" kodyfikatsii hospodarskoho zakonodavstva. Yurydychnyi visnyk Ukrainy. No. 4. 29 sichnia — 4 liutoho 2016 r. P. 14 (zakinchennia) [in Ukrainian].
Caenegem R.C. van. The unification of European year: a pipedream? Europ. rev. 2006. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 33-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798706000044
Podtserkovnyi O.P., Belianevych O.A. Kodyfikatsiia ekonomichnoho zakonodavstva – vdoskonalennia na osnovi zakordonnoho dosvidu i analizu vitchyznianoho zakonodavstva. Holos Ukrainy. 13.04.2016. URL: http://www.golos.com.ua/article/267038 [in Ukrainian].
Rozovskyi B.G. Pro odnu velyku "nepravdu", abo yak ne mozhna vesty dyskusiiu. Pravo Ukrainy. 2001. No. 1. P. 127-129 [in Ukrainian].
Derzhavni rishennia potrebuiut operatyvnosti. Premier proponuie novyi mekhanizm ukhvalennia nahalnykh ekonomichnykh zakoniv. Uriadovyi kurier. No. 52 (6168). P. 2 [in Ukrainian].
Rihter V.A. Tol’ko odna iz desjati tysjach molekul stanovitsja lekarstvom. Vserossijskij jekonomicheskij zhurnal "JeKO". 2017. No. 6. P. 19-31 [in Russian].
Mamutov V.K. Zainteresovannost’ i samousilenie. Ekonomіka ta pravo. 2017. No. 3 (48). P. 3-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2017.03.003 [in Russian].
Baiderin O. Cherhova initsiatyva shchodo skasuvannia HK vualiuie zvedennia naukovykh rakhunkiv ta lobiiuvannia zvychainykh komertsiinykh interesiv. Zakon i Biznes. V-8 (1254). 20-26.02.2016. URL: http://zib.com.ua/ua/121809-chergova_iniciativa_schodo_skasuvannya_gk_vualyue_zvedennya_.html [in Ukrainian].
Martem’janov V.S. Juridicheskaja tragedija. Ekonomіka ta pravo. 2004. No. 3 (10). P. 113-120 [in Russian].
