CONCEPT OF LEGAL REGIME OF ECONOMIC PROPERTY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2020.01.003

Keywords:

economic property, legal regime of economic property, static and dynamic elements

Abstract

The article explores the issues of defining the concept of legal regime of economic property and the list of elements that make up the content of the legal regime of the said property. It is emphasized that the definition of a legal regime by the totality of the elements it covers must first be combined with a "legal definition", that is, since it is a legal regime, the definition of this concept must necessarily include a legal (legal) component, what are the regulatory instruments — regulations and individual legal acts. In some cases, unless it is prohibited by law, a contractual instrument may be the regulatory instrument for determining the legal regime of property. Secondly, it is advisable to divide the elements that are included in the content of the legal regime of property into two groups: 1) static elements that can be considered as objects of the legal regime of property (types of property, its structure, legal title of property), and 2) dynamic elements (legal relations regarding the exercise of property rights, economic management rights and operational management rights, the acquisition of property and its disposal from the property sphere of the participant of economic relations, as well as the disposal of property by third parties). With this in mind, it is proposed to define the legal regime of economic property as established by the law and the owner of the property or the body authorized by him (both in an individual legal act and in the contract) a set of static (types and structure of property, its legal title) and dynamic (legal relations in order the acquisition, possession, use, disposal of such property and the recovery of property, as well as the disposal of property by authorized bodies and cre ditors).

References

Sokolova I.O. Pravovyi rezhym yak katehoriia pravovoi nauky: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2014. 152 p. [in Ukrainian].

Suchasnyi slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv: Blyzko 20 tys. sliv i slovospoluchen. Ukl. O.I. Skopnenko, T.V. Tsymbaliuk. Kyiv: Dovira, 2006. 789 p. [in Ukrainian].

Venediktov A.V. Gosudarstvennaja socialisticheskaja sobstvennost’. Moscow-Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo AS USSR, 1948. 840 p. [in Russian].

Kharytonov Ye.O., Kharytonova O.I. Pryvatne pravo yak kontsept. Vytoky. Odesa: Feniks, 2018. Vol. I. 556 p. [in Ukrainian].

Zamengof Z.M. Pravovoj rezhim imushhestva hozjajstvennyh organov. Moscow: Juridicheskaja literatura, 1972. 184 p. [in Russian].

Mihajlin S.Z. Pravovoj rezhim centralizovannyh fondov i rezervov denezhnyh sredstv ministerstva: avtoref. diss. … kand. jurid. nauk. Kharkiv, 1970. 20 p. [in Russian].

Hospodarske pravo Ukrainy: pidruchnyk. Za red. V.M. Haivoronskoho i V.P. Zhushmana. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2005. 384 p. [in Ukrainian].

Pronska H.V. Vybrane. Kyiv: Osvita Ukrainy, 2013. 696 p. [in Ukrainian].

Hospodarske pravo: pidruchnyk. Za zah. red. D.V. Zadykhaila, V.M. Pashkova. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2012. 696 p. [in Ukrainian].

Hospodarske pravo: pidruchnyk. Za red. O.P. Podtserkovnoho. 3-tie vyd., dop. i pererob. Odesa: Feniks, 2018. 616 p. [in Ukrainian].

Pudovkina O.V. Problemy opredelenija i klassifikacii pravovogo rezhima nedvizhimogo imushhestva. Vestnik Saratovskoj gosudarstvennoj juridicheskoj akademii. 2016. No. 5 (112). P. 91-96 [in Russian].

Shcherbyna V.S. Poniattia ta zmist pravovoho rezhymu maina subiektiv hospodariuvannia. Yurydychna Ukraina. 2007. No. 1. P. 70-80 [in Ukrainian].

Turdimatov F.K. Ponjatie pravovogo rezhima slozhnoj nedvizhimoj veshhi. Vestnik jekonomiki, prava i sociologii. 2015. No. 1. P. 143-146 [in Russian].

Rusinov A.L. Ponjatie i jelementy pravovogo rezhima predprijatija. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Serija "Pravo". 2014. No. 3 (40). P. 106-111 [in Russian].

Kossak V.M. Tsyvilno-pravovi problemy rehuliuvannia inozemnykh investytsii v Ukraini: avtoref. dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03. Kyiv, 1996. 48 p. [in Ukrainian].

Semerak O.S. Pravove rehuliuvannia ta zakhyst inozemnykh investytsii (za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy, Uhorshchyny, Polshchi ta Slovachchyny). Uzhhorod, 2000. 164 p. [in Ukrainian].

Yankova O.S. Pravove rehuliuvannia statutnoho fondu komertsiinykh orhanizatsii: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. Donetsk, 2000. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].

Shchokin R.H. Pravove rehuliuvannia intelektualnoi vlasnosti u hospodarskii systemi rozvytku Ukrainy: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. Kyiv, 2014. 19 p. [in Ukrainian].

Tokunova A.V. Pravovyi rezhym faktorynhu: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. Donetsk, 2012. 19 p. [in Ukrainian].

Ahmet’janova Z.A. Pravovoj status imushhestva juridicheskih lic: diss. … kand. jurid. nauk: 12.00.03. Kazan’, 1997. 228 p. [in Russian].

Podshivalov T.P. Ob’ekt grazhdanskih prav i pravovoj rezhim: problema opredelenija. Vestnik JuUrGU. Serija "Pravo". 2013, Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 49-54.

Published

2024-09-27

How to Cite

Shcherbyna, V. (2024). CONCEPT OF LEGAL REGIME OF ECONOMIC PROPERTY. Economics and Law, 56(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2020.01.003