ECONOMIC AND MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF DETERMINING THE VECTOR OF DOMINANT PROPERTIES OF ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT

Labour Economics, Social Economy and Policy

Authors

  • O.S. Kravchenko Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade named Michael Tugan-Baranovsky, Donetsk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2013.03.130

Keywords:

enterprise, key property, systems theory, theoretical-game model, activation, process, development

Abstract

A set of properties for each stage of socioeconomic development of the system (formation, growth, limiting effectiveness, resistance to decline) is established. A methodical approach to determination of the vector of dominant properties was elaborated to activate the processes of enterprise development on the basis of building a theoretical-game economicmathematical model.

References

Burmaka M.M., Burmaka T.M. Upravlinnia rozvytkom pidpryiemstva na prykladi pidpryiemstv budivelnoi haluzi: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: KhNADU, 2011. 204 s.

Kasianova N.V. Upravlinnia rozvytkom pidpryiemstva na osnovi kumuliatyvnoho pidkhodu: kontseptsiia, modeli ta metody: monohrafiia. Donetsk: NAN Ukrainy, In-t ekonomiky prom-sti; SPD Kupryianov V.S., 2011. 374 s.

Mekhanizm upravlinnia potentsialom innovatsiinoho rozvytku promyslovykh pidpryiemstv: monohrafiia. Za red. Yu.S. Shypulinoi. Sumy: TOV “DD "Papirus”, 2012. 458 s.

Nadtoka T.B., Kakunina H.A., Martiakova O.V. ta in.Upravlinski tekhnolohii u rishenni suchasnykh problem rozvytku sotsialno-ekonomichnykh system: monohrafiia. Za zah. red. O.V. Martiakovoi. Donetsk: Vyd-vo DonNTU, 2011. 744 s.

Raievnieva O.V. Upravlinnia rozvytkom pidpryiemstva: metodolohiia, mekhanizmy, modeli: monohrafiia. Kh.: VD “INZhEK”, 2006. 496 s.

Trydid O.M. Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm stratehichnoho rozvytku pidpryiemstva: monohrafiia. Kh.: Vyd-vo KhDEU, 2002. 364 s.

Burimenko Ju.I. Osnovy teorii sistem i sistemnogo analiza: ucheb. posobie. Odessa: Izd-vo “Optimum”, 2005. 135 s.

Andreev G.N., Savello L.L. O formalizacii kategorii “Sistema”. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija. 2009. № 3. S. 37–42.

Ruban V.Ja., Drogal' T.G. Integracija ASU na osnove baz dannyh. K.: Tehnika, 1988. 192 s.

Fathutdinov R.A. Upravlenie konkurentosposobnost'ju organizacii: uchebnik. 2-e izd., isprav. i dop. M.: Izd-vo “Jeksmo”, 2005. 544 s.

Spicnadel' V. N. Osnovy sistemnogo analiza: ucheb. posobie. SPb.: Izd. dom “Biznes-pressa”, 2000. 326 s.

Roj O.M. Issledovanija social'no-jekonomicheskih i politicheskih processov: ucheb. dlja vuzov. SPb.: Piter, 2004. 364 s.

Vitlinskyi V. V., Nakonechnyi S.I., Sharapov O.D. Ekonomichnyi ryzyk ta metody yoho vymiriuvannia: pidruchnyk. K.: KNEU, 2000. 354 s.

Voina O.A. Ekonomichnyi ryzyk. Matematychni modeli ta metody keruvannia: navch. posibnyk. K.: VPTs “Kyivskyi universytet”, 2001. 98 s.

Published

2024-09-26

How to Cite

Kravchenko, O. (2024). ECONOMIC AND MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF DETERMINING THE VECTOR OF DOMINANT PROPERTIES OF ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT: Labour Economics, Social Economy and Policy. Economics and Law, 37(3), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2013.03.130