COURT FEE IN COMMERCIAL PROCEEDINGS: LEGAL NATURE, FUNCTIONS, AND LIMITS OF APPLICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2026.02.018Keywords:
commercial litigation, court fee, principle of legal certainty, res judicata, right to a fair trial, mandatory payment, discretionary powers of the court, judicial control, legitimate expectationsAbstract
The article examines the financial, budgetary and procedural aspects of the institution of the court fee in the context of conventional and constitutional principles of ensuring the right of business entities to access justice and effective judicial protection.
The key task is to provide a theoretical justification for a holistic model that will ensure the coordination of the purpose of the court fee for financing judicial proceedings with the procedural nature of commercial litigation and constitutional guarantees of access to justice, defining clear boundaries for its application and collection in accordance with the principles of proportionality and legal certainty.
By its legal nature, a court fee is a type of non-taxable mandatory payment for a specific purpose. Its features are: universal nature of collection throughout the territory of Ukraine; imperative nature as a legal fact with which the law associates the possibility of the emergence, development or termination of procedural legal relations; the basis for payment is the exercise of the right to apply to court for the purpose of performing a procedural action by the court; the grounds for collecting the fee, rates, procedure and terms of payment, payers, benefits are normatively defined and exhaustive, which corresponds to the principles of legality, legal certainty and proportionality. From an economic point of view, the court fee is an instrument for partial compensation of public costs of administering justice (belonging torevenues of the special fund of the State Budget of Ukraine) and at the same time can perform a regulatory function of deterring the filing of unfounded claims (applications, complaints).
The main functions of the court fee include: procedural as a condition for opening proceedings or performing a procedural action; compensatory and regulatory regarding partial compensation of state expenses for the administration of justice; preventive regarding deterring unfounded appeals to court; stimulating regarding pre-trial settlement of the dispute, conclusion of a settlement agreement and use of alternative non-judicial forms of protection.
The procedure for judicial control over the collection of court fees in the context of State compliance with the right to a fair trial and the principle of legal certainty. The legal grounds and limits for the recovery of the court fee unpaid at the stage of filing a claim (application, complaint) are substantiated.decision-making stage in the caseand after the completion of the proceedings in the case - by issuingadditional decision within the three-year period for the execution of the decision.
References
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy vid 28 chervnia 1996 roku URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [in Ukraine].
Pro sudovyi zbir: Zakon Ukrainy vid 8.07.2011r. №3674-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3674-17#Text [in Ukraine].
Hospodarskyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12#Text [in Ukraine].
Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod vid 04 lystopada 1950 roku. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text [in Ukraine].
Bohomol O.V. Sudovi vytraty u hospodarskomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy. K.: TsUL. 2015. 168 s. (data zvernennia: 13.03.2026) [in Ukraine].
Shpomer A.I., Chumachenko V.Iu. Sudovi vytraty v hospodarskomu protsesi. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. 2023. №11. S.204-207 DOI https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-11/46.
Zaritskyi M.D., Halushka N.O. Sudovi vytraty v hospodarskomu protsesi. Visnyk Lvivskoho torhovelno-ekonomichnoho universytetu. Yurydychni nauky. 2019. Vyp. 8. S.52-61. URL: https://www.lute.lviv.ua/fileadmin/www.lac.lviv.ua/data/DOI/2616-7611-2019-08-06.pdf [in Ukraine].
Sakara N.Iu. Pro pravovu pryrodu sudovoho zboru. Problemy zakonnosti. 2016. № 132. S. 135-146. DOI https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.132.60840 [in Ukraine].
Sakara N.Iu. Problema dostupnosti pravosuddia u tsyvilnykh spravakh. Kharkiv: Pravo. 2010. 256 s. [in Ukraine].
Cheremnov D.V. Funktsii instytutu sudovykh vytrat u tsyvilnomu protsesi Ukrainy z ohliadu na praktyku Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny. Praktyka YeSPL z pytan tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho prava: materialy kruhloho stolu, m. Odesa, 5.04.2016 r. Odesa: Yurydychna literatura. S. 59−62. [in Ukraine].
Ustiushenko S.E. Poniattia ta funktsii sudovoho zboru v tsyvilnomu protsesi. Pravo i suspilstvo. 2019. №3. S.129-133. DOI https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736-2019-3-1-22 [in Ukraine].
Hospodarskyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar. Za zah. red. d. iu.n., profesora, akademika Akademii nauk Vyshchoi shkoly Ukrainy M. M. Yasynka. Kyiv : Alerta, 2024. 696 s. [in Ukraine].
Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Hospodarskoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: stanom na 20 sich. 2018 r. / S. V. Banakh, Yu. O. Buhlak, K. Z. Voznyi [ta in.]. Za zah. red. S. O. Koroieda. K. : Profesional. 2018. 400 s. [in Ukraine].
Voronova L. K. Finansove pravo Ukrainy. K.: Pretsedent. 2006. 448 s. [in Ukraine].
Zvarych O.V. Sudovyi zbir v Ukraini: problemy ta perspektyvy. Finansy Ukrainy. 2013. № 2. S. 59-69 [in Ukraine].
Cappelletti M., Garth B. (eds.). Access to Justice. Vol. I: A World Survey. Milan: Giuffrè Editore. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.1978. 662 p. [in English].
Cappelletti M., Garth B. (eds.). Access to Justice. Vol. II: Promising Institutions. Milan: Giuffrè Editore; Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff. 1979. 589 p. (in English).
Cappelletti M., Garth B. (eds.). Access to Justice. Vol. III: Emerging Issues and Perspectives. Milan: Giuffrè Editore; Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff. 1979. 608 p. [in English].
Shavell S. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press. 2004. 737 p. [in English].
Posner R. A. Economic Analysis of Law. 9th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. 2014. 984 p. [in English].
Podatkovyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 2 hrudnia 2010 roku 2755-VI URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17#Text [in Ukraine].
Biudzhetnyi kodeks Ukrainy 8 lypnia 2010 roku № 2456-VI URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-17#Text [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 10 bereznia 2026 roku № 2-r/2026 u spravi № 1-5/2025(374/25) za konstytutsiinym podanniam Verkhovnoho Sudu shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) chastyny druhoi statti 3, pidpunktu 5 punktu 3 chastyny druhoi statti 4 Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro sudovyi zbir» URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v002p710-26#Text [in Ukraine].
Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy vid 6 lypnia 2005 roku № 2747-IV URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text [in Ukraine].
Pro sudoustrii ta status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainy 2 chervnia 2016 roku № 1402-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 5 chervnia 2019 roku № 3-r(I)/2019 u spravi za konstytutsiinoiu skarhoiu tovarystva z obmezhenoiu vidpovidalnistiu «METRO KESh END KERI UKRAINA» shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen abzatsiv dvadtsiat chetvertoho, dvadtsiat piatoho, dvadtsiat shostoho rozdilu I Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro vnesennia zmin do Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy shchodo utochnennia deiakykh polozhen ta usunennia superechnostei, shcho vynykly pry pryiniatti Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro vnesennia zmin do Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy shchodo pokrashchennia investytsiinoho klimatu v Ukraini»» vid 23 bereznia 2017 roku № 1989-VIII URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/va03p710-19#Text [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 23 sichnia 2020 roku № 1-r/2020 u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam 49 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) okremykh polozhen rozdilu I, punktu 2 rozdilu III «Prykintsevi polozhennia» Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo pensiinoho zabezpechennia» vid 2 bereznia 2015 roku № 213-VIII URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v001p710-20#Text [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 18 chervnia 2020 roku № 5-r(II)/2020) u spravi za konstytutsiinoiu skarhoiu hromadianky Ukrainy Levchenko Olhy Mykolaivny shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) prypysu punktu 5 rozdilu III «Prykintsevi polozhennia» Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo pensiinoho zabezpechennia» vid 2 bereznia 2015 roku № 213-VIII URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/va05p710-20#Text [in Ukraine].
Spetsialne doslidzhennia Venetsiiskoi komisii «Za demokratiiu cherez pravo. Mirylo pravovladdia», SDL-AD(2016)007 URL: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2016)007-ukr [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy № 3-r(II)/2025 vid 21.01.2025 u spravi za konstytutsiinoiu skarhoiu Tovarystva z obmezhenoiu vidpovidalnistiu «Heomaks-Resurs» shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) okremoho prypysu abzatsu druhoho pidpunktu 14.1.212 punktu 14.1 statti 14 Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy v redaktsii Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro vnesennia zmin do Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy ta deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo podatkovoi reformy» vid 28 hrudnia 2014 roku № 71-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v003p710-25#Text [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 20 chervnia 2019 roku № 6-r/2019 u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam 62 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) Ukazu Prezydenta Ukrainy «Pro dostrokove prypynennia povnovazhen Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy ta pryznachennia pozacherhovykh vyboriv» URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v006p710-19#Text [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 22.09.2005 r. № 5-rp/2005 u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam 51 narodnoho deputata Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen statti 92, punktu 6 rozdilu X «Perekhidni polozhennia» Zemelnoho kodeksu Ukrainy (sprava pro postiine korystuvannia zemelnymy diliankamy) URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v005p710-05#Text [in Ukraine].
Dopovid Venetsiiskoi komisii pro pravovladdia Yevropeiskoi komisii «Za demokratiiu cherez pravo», ukhvalenii na yii 86-mu plenarnomu zasidanni 25-26 bereznia 2011 roku URL: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2011)003rev2-ukr [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Kruslin v. France» vid 24 kvitnia 1990 roku (zaiava № 11801/85) URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57626%22]} [in English].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Feldman proty Ukrainy (№ 2)» vid 12 sichnia 2012 roku (zaiava №42921/09) URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_787#Text [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Riabykh proty Rosii» vid 24.07.2003 (zaiava №52854/39) URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/docx/pdf?library=ECHR&id=001-125662&filename=CASE%20OF%20RYABYKH%20v.%20RUSSIA%20-%20%5BUkrainian%20Translation%5D%20summary%20by%20the%20Lviv%20Laboratory%20of%20Human%20Rights.pdf&logEvent=False [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Brumaresku proty Rumunii» (Brumărescu v. Romania) vid 28.10.1999 URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58337%22]} [in English].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Kroits proty Polshchi» (Kreuz v. Poland) vid 19.06.2001 (Zaiava N 28249/95) URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_030#Text [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Podbelskyi i PPU Polpure proty Polshchi» (Podbielski and PPU Polpure v. Poland) vid 26.07.2005 (Zaiava 39199/98) URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69911 [in English].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Vaisman ta inshi proty Rumunii» (Weissman and Others v. Romania) vid 24.05.2006 (zaiava 63945/00) URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75511 [in English].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Rysovskyi proty Ukrainy» (Rysovskyy v. Ukraine) vid 20.10.2011 (Zaiava № 29979/04) URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_854#Text [in Ukraine].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Chakarevych proty Khorvatii» (Čakarević v. Croatia) vid 26.04.2018 (Application no. 48921/13) URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-182445%22]} [in English].
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Sporrong i Lonnrot proty Shvetsii» (Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden) vid 23.09.1982. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_098#Text [in Ukraine].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Вікторія РЄЗНІКОВА, Олександра КОЛОГОЙДА

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.







