THE PLACE OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PROTECTION AMONG THE FORMS OF PROTECTION OF BUSINESS ENTITIES' RIGHTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2024.04.028Keywords:
extrajudicial protection, pre-trial protection, judicial protection, business entity, court, claim, form of protection, method of protection, notificationAbstract
The article focuses on the analysis and determination of the place of extrajudicial protection of business entities ‘rights in the system of existing forms of protection of such entities’ rights, and also on the proposals for improving the legal regulation of extrajudicial protection.
Based on the analysis of Ukrainian legislation and scientific works by O. Khrimli, V. Petrunya, L. Didenko, O. Oliynyk, V. Hryhorieva, and other scholars, the author examines the features of each form of protection of rights, the correlation of extrajudicial protection with different forms of protection, and their interaction, and identifies the features and peculiarities which distinguish the extrajudicial form of protection.
The analysis of scientific opinion leads to the conclusion that there is a variety of approaches to defining the forms of protection, but, in the author's opinion, given the content of protection actions, it is more appropriate to divide them into pre-trial, extrajudicial and court forms of protection of business entities' rights.
While the status of pre-trial and judicial protection, their documentary expression, and the procedure for application are directly defined by the current legislation of Ukraine, the extrajudicial protection of rights and the procedure for its implementation do not have a clear legal regulation.
The regulatory definition of extrajudicial protection of the rights of business entities as an independent form of protection, the separation and systematization of out-of-court remedies will contribute to the improvement and development of the extrajudicial form of protection of such entities.
To unify the procedure for business entities to act in the process of extrajudicial protection of rights, as a generally written documentary expression of the application of such protection, it is proposed to consolidate in the Commercial Code of Ukraine the provisions on notification of violation of rights and application of the method of extrajudicial protection of their rights, with the definition of the content of such notification.
References
Solod I.V. Zastosuvannia pozasudovoho zakhystu prav ta interesiv subiektiv hospodariuvannia. Tsyvilne, pidpryiemnytske, hospodarske ta trudove pravo. 2015. № 3. P. 170-175. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ Nashp_2015_3_29 [in Ukrainian].
Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Hospodarskoho kodeksu Ukrainy / za zah. red. V.K. Mamutova. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 2004. 687 p. [in Ukrainian].
Lavrin O. Zakhyst prav subiektiv hospodariuvannia, yoho formy ta sposoby. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 11. P. 56-59 [in Ukrainian].
Hryhorchuk M.V. Zakhyst prav ta okhoroniuvanykh zakonom interesiv subiektiv hospodariuvannia: materialnyi i protsesualnyi aspekty. Teoriia i praktyka pravoznavstva. 2017. Vyp. 1. 13 p. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ tipp_2017_1_9 [in Ukrainian].
Hospodarskyi kodeks Ukrainy : Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 No. 436-IV. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2003. № 18, № 19-20, № 21-22. St. 144 [in Ukrainian].
Naumenko K.S. Poniattia ta vydy form tsyvilno pravovoho zakhystu osobystykh nemainovykh prav fizychnoi osoby, shcho zabezpechuiut yii sotsialne buttia. Forum prava. 2014. No. 2. P. 296-300. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ Chkup_2013_4_41 [in Ukrainian].
Petrunia V.V. Poniattia ta systema sposobiv zakhystu prav subiektiv hospodariuvannia: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. Odesa, 2019. 21 p. URL: https://dspace.onua.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/45796fc2-7453- 48fb-b7fc-386c68b83e35/content
[in Ukrainian].
Neiurysdyktsiini formy zakhystu prav ta interesiv subiektiv hospodariuvannia / za zah. red. M.S. Dolynskoi. Lviv: Halytska vydavnycha spilka, 2020. 174 p. URL: https://dspace.lvduvs.edu.ua/handle/1234567890/2916 [in Ukrainian].
Oliinyk O.B., Ptushkina K.V. Formy ta sposoby zakhystu prav subiektiv hospodariuvannia. Legal Bulletin. No. 1. 2020. P. 72-76. URL: https://lbku.krok.edu.ua/index.php/legal-bulletin/article/view/288 [in Ukrainian].
Derevianko B.V., Turkot O.A. Zakhyst prav subiektiv hospodariuvannia: navchalnyi posibnyk / za red. B.V. Derevianka; 2-e vyd., pererobl. i dopovn.; MVS Ukrainy, Donetskyi yurydychnyi instytut. Lviv: Liha-Pres, 2019. 150 p. URL: http://dspace.puet.edu.ua/handle/123456789/7002 [in Ukrainian].
Pravove rehuliuvannia hospodarskoi diialnosti: navch. posib. / za zah. red. V.V. Machuskoho. Kyiv: KNEU. 2015. 152 p. [in Ukrainian].
Lavrin O. Pozasudovyi zakhyst prav subiektiv hospodariuvannia ta yoho znachennia v suchasnykh umovakh. Ekonomika ta pravo. № 1 (72). 2024. P. 28-38. https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2024.01.028 [in Ukrainian]
Khanyk-Pospolitak R., Pospolitak V. «Dosudove», «alternatyvne», «pozasudove» vrehuliuvannia / vyrishennia pryvatnopravovykh sporiv: spivvidnoshennia poniat. Tsyvilne pravo i protses. 2019. No. 1. P. 38-44. URL: http://pgp- journal.kiev.ua/archive/2019/1/8.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Hryhorieva V.V. Efektyvni mekhanizmy zakhystu prav subiektiv hospodariuvannia. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. No. 3/2017. P. 58-61. URL: http://lsej.org.ua/3_2017/17.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Marych Kh., Deriuhin I. Dosudove ta pozasudove vrehuliuvannia sporiv u hospodarskomu protsesi Ukrainy. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia: «Iurydychni nauky». 2022. No. 4 (36). P. 157-163. URL: https://science.lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/journal-paper/2023/jan/29733/251.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Balukh V.S. Normatyvno-pravovi osnovy formuvannia systemy alternatyvnoho vyrishennia sporiv v Ukraini. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava. 2013. No. 4. P. 162-168. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Chkup_2013_4_41 [in Ukrainian].
Yefremova I.I., Tereshchuk M.M. Problemy realizatsii pozasudovykh sposobiv zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav. Ekonomika. Finansy. Pravo. 2022. No. 8. P.17-21. https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2022.8.4 [in Ukrainian].
Didenko L.V. Spivvidnoshennia sudovykh ta pozasudovykh sposobiv zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Yurydychni nauky. 2020. No. 3. P. 44-49. https://doi.org/10.26661/2616-9444-2020-3-06 [in Ukrainian]
Rudnytska O.P., Demianiuk V.M. Neiurysdyktsiini sposoby zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii. 2020. No. 6. P. 63-69. https://doi.org/10.32782/39221388 [in Ukrainian].
