PROBLEMS OF DETERMINING THE STRATEGY GOALS OF MONETARY POLICY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2018.01.076

Keywords:

monetary policy, National Bank of Ukraine, strategic goals, stability of monetary unit, budget policy, financial stability

Abstract

The article analyzes the essence of the strategic goal of the monetary policy of the National Bank of Ukraine — ensuring the stability of the monetary unit of Ukraine. This is a complex and internally dynamic term that includes three elements: internal (price) and / or external stability (stability of the exchange rate) of a monetary unit, as well as stability of prices for credit resources (assets). In turn, each of these elements contains complex ratios of macroeconomic parameters that make it impossible to simultaneously their achievement. It is determined that the instruments of monetary policy are not enough to achieve it. Effective results in this direction can be achieved provided that the actions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and the National Bank of Ukraine are coordinated, as well as the comprehensive application of all instruments of the state mechanism for regulating the economy. The aim of securing the stability of the monetary unit should be separate from the goal of financial stability and delegate to a special institution that ensures appropriate coordination of the activities of all regulatory bodies and has a more functional tools in this direction, in particular to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. The monetary policy of the National Bank of Ukraine should remain an element of macroeconomic regulation aimed at supporting general economic goals, while the activity of central banks should be more closely integrated into the process of ensuring financial stability. To achieve this goal, along with instruments of monetary policy, an additional set of tools will be applied, in particular: the introduction of proper supervision of the financial system, monitoring and analysis of its systemic risks; micro- and macroprudential instruments (in particular, measures to ensure capital adequacy and liquidity in the banking sector) measures to increase the sustainability of the financial infrastructure; the establishment of capital requirements in accordance with the Basel III agreement, etc. Such tools can prevent imbalances, strengthen the financial sector’s stability and strengthen the effect of the use of the instruments of monetary policy, in particular, operations on the open market, the establishment of mandatory reserves, refinancing ect.

References

Koziuk V.V. Suchasni tsentralni banky: seredovyshche funktsionuvannia ta monetarni rishennia. Ternopil: Aston, 2001 [in Ukrainian].

Sharynska O.Ie. Tsinova stabilnist: sutnist ta mistse u systemi tsile hroshovo-kredytnoi polityky. Visnyk Ukrainskoi akade mii bankivskoi spravy. 2003. No. 2: 27—31 [in Ukrainian].

Zhigaev A.Ju. Nekotorye aktual’nye voprosy vzaimosvjazi finansovoj stabil’nosti i denezhno-kreditnoj politiki (na primere Federal’noj rezervnoj sistemy SShA). Den’gi i kredit. 2012. No. 2: 21—33 [in Russian].

Pro Natsionalnyi bank Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 20.05.1999 No. 679-XIV. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 1999. No. 29. St. 238 [in Ukrainian].

Ukraina: ekonomichnyi ohliad. URL: http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/298951507019475876/Ukraine-EconomicUpdate-October-2017-uk.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Najdenov V.S., Smenkovskij A.Ju. Infljacija i monetarizm. Uroki antikrizisnoj politiki. Belaja Cerkov’: Belocerkovskaja knizhnaja fabrika, 2003 [in Russian].

Belinska Ya. Infliatsiini tendentsii ta stabilnist natsionalnoi hroshovoi odynytsi. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. 2013. No. 8 (149): 12—15 [in Ukrainian].

Zablodskaja I.V., Androsov S.M., Medjanik A.V. Stabil’nost’ denezhnoj edinicy Ukrainy: jekonomiko-pravovoj aspekt. Ekonomіka ta pravo. 2010. No. 1(26): 46—52 [in Russian].

Golikova L.V. Sovremennye mehanizmy provedenija denezhno-kreditnoj politiki nacional’nyh central’nyh bankov v uslovijah finansovoj nestabil’nosti. Dis. … kand. jekon. nauk: 08.00.10. Moskow, 2012 [in Russian].

Celi politiki kompromissa: rost jekonomiki ili snizhenie infljacii? URL: https://zn.ua/macrolevel/celi-politiki-kompromissarost-ekonomiki-ili-snizhenie-inflyacii-276314_.html [in Russian].

Economy Rankings. URL: http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings

Informatsiia pro nadani Natsionalnym bankom Ukrainy bankam kredyty na strok bilshe 30 kalendarnykh dniv u 2018 rotsi. URL: https://bank.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=62468916&cat_id=37650 [in Ukrainian].

Oshhadbank privlek u NBU refinansirovanie na 3 mlrd grn v svjazi s narashhivaniem kreditovanija krupnyh korporativnyh klientov. URL: http://interfax.com.ua/news/economic/463637.html [in Russian].

Banky prodovzhuiut naroshchuvaty kredytuvannia naselennia, — NBU. URL: http://yur-gazeta.com/golovna/bankiprodovzhuyut-naroshchuvati-kredituvannya-naselennya-nbu.html [in Ukrainian].

Kartaev F.S. Modelirovanie vlijanija vybora celevogo orientira monetarnoj politiki na jekonomicheskij rost. Dis. … d-ra jekon. nauk: 08.00.13. Moskow, 2017 [in Russian].

Ofitsiinyi sait Natsionalnoho banku Ukrainy. URL: https://bank.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/category?cat_id=742185 [in Ukrainian].

Paradoksy monetarnoi polityky NBU. URL: http://gazeta.dt.ua/macrolevel/paradoksimonetarnoyi-politiki-nbu-.html [in Ukrainian].

Polityka monetarnoho rozshyrennia na pidtrymku zrostannia ta rozvytku. Nauk. red. V. Yurchyshyn. Kyiv: Zapovit, 2016 [in Ukrainian].

Kallaur P.V. Obespechenie monetarnoj i finansovoj stabil’nosti: konflikt i garmonija celej? Jekonomika i banki. 2008. No. 1: 7—11 [in Russian].

Tinbergen J. On the Theory of Economic Policy. URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/15884/

Ferguson R.W. Should Financial Stability Be an Explicit Central Bank Objective? Conference on : "Challenges to Central Banking from Globalized Financial Markets", International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C. 2003. Р. 7—15.

Published

2024-10-09

How to Cite

Hudima, T. (2024). PROBLEMS OF DETERMINING THE STRATEGY GOALS OF MONETARY POLICY. Economics and Law, 49(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2018.01.076