LEGAL REGIME OF FARM PROPERTY AS AN EFFECTIVE FORM OF AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITY IN THE CURRENT CRISIS CONDITIONS

Authors

  • Alla ZELISKO Senior Research Fellow, Academician F.H. Burchak Scientific Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the NALS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2024.03.028

Keywords:

legal entity, farm, legal regime of property, corporate legal relations, business entity, statutory capital, corporate rights.

Abstract

The article focuses on the legal aspects of farms’ activities related to the issue of their property separation. The author successfully emphasises the entrepreneurial legal nature of farms, and therefore the property basis of their activities is the key to their efficiency and achievement of the goal of generating profits for distribution among the members of the farm. It is the issues related to the property basis of farms that are at the heart of the qualitative legal regulation of the exercise of their rights and obligations by their members. The article traces the historical background of the existing problems and legal approaches to the legal regime of farm property. The author emphasises that it is precisely the legislative deformations on this issue that have led to the existing inaccuracies in the current state of legal regulation of farms. Various changes in approaches to the possible forms of activity of farms, which have gone through a difficult path of evolution from joint activity to a legal entity and a farm established by an individual entrepreneur, have not contributed to solving these problems. The article notes that the existence of two structures of мfarms: a legal entity and an individual entrepreneur determines the need to differentiate the legal regime of their property. After all, a legal entity requires separation of property from its founders, while the construction of an individual entrepreneur does not. The canons of civil law regarding the мdivision of liability between a legal entity and its members (founders), as well as the  separation of their property, are not properly reflected in the current version of the Law “On Farming”, despite the fact that they are constitutive differences between the functioning of a farm in the form of a legal entity or an individual entrepreneur. The author states that the current provisions of the special legislative act do not provide for any distinctive provisions related to the activities of farms - legal entities and farms established by an individual entrepreneur. And these differences are based on the criterion of property separation of the farm and its founder or members. The article notes that the law does not distinguish between the legal regime of property of farms with the status of a legal entity and those established by an individual entrepreneur. Incorrect regulation of the structure of the authorised capital of farms as one of the basic sources of their property causes further difficulties in the exercise by members of farms of their rights, which are corporate in nature. In practice, the structure of farms established by individual entrepreneurs also raises questions. The relations between the founder of the farm and its members are not properly regulated. It is concluded that this form of farming will be more effective in the form of a simple partnership with the pooling of иcontributions of the members of the partnership.

References

Uhoda mizh Uriadom Ukrainy ta Yevropeiskoiu komisiieiu pro finansuvannia zahodu «Pidtrymka EU dlia rozvytku

silskoho hospodarstva ta malykh fermerskykh hospodarstv v Ukraini» vid 28.01.2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.

ua/laws/show/984_003-20#Text [in Ukrainian].

Pro selianske (fermerske) hospodarstvo: Zakon Ukrainy vid 20.12.1991 No 2009-XII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady

Ukrainy. 1992. No. 14. St. 186. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2009-12#Text [in Ukrainian].

Zelisko A.V. Pravovyi status fermerskykh hospodarstv yak uirydychnykh osib pryvatnoho prava. Pravo Ukrainy. 2010. No. 5. P. 143-149 [in Ukrainian]

Spasybo-Fatieieva I.V. Shliakh stanovlennia deiakykh uirydychnykh osib v Ukraini: pytannia pravovoho status ta

naslidky superechlyvoho rehuliuvannia. Problemy tsyvilnoho prava ta protsesu: tezy dop. uchasnykiv nauk.-prakt.

konf., prysviach. 99-i richnytsi vid dnia narodzhennia О.А. Pushkina (м. Vinnytsia, 24 trav. 2024 r.). Vinnytsia;

Kharkiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav, 2024. P. 89-94 [in Ukrainian].

Yermolenko V.M. Pavovyi rezhym maina fermerskoho hospodarstva. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2005. No. 12. P. 65-69 [in Ukrainian].

Hospodarskyi kodeks Ukrainy: naukovo-praktychnyi komentar / za red. V.М. Kossaka. Кyiv: Аlerta, 2010. 672 p. [in

Ukrainian].

Kuchrenko I.M. Orhanizatsiino-pravovi formy yurydychnykh osib pryvatnoho prava. Кyiv: Іn-t derzhavy i prava

ім. V.М. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy, 2004. 328 p. [in Ukrainian].

Zelisko A.V. Fermerske hospodarstvo yak subiekt korporatyvnykh vidnosyn. Vdoskonalennia pravovoho rehuliuvannia korporatyvnykh vidnosyn v suchasnykh umovakh material Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. seminaru (25—26 veres. 2009 r.). Ivano-Frankivsk: Yuryd. іn-t Prykarpat. nats. un-tu ім. V. Stefanyka, 2010. P. 92-96 [in Ukrainian].

Spasybo-Fatieieva I.V. Pravovyi aspect korporatyvnoii vlasnosti. Korporatyvne upravlinnia / za red. І. Spasybo-

Fatieievoii. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2007. P. 243-270 [in Ukrainian].

Vasylieva V.A. Problemy rozvytku korporatyvnoho prava. Pryvatne pravo. 2013. No 1. P. 135-145 [in Ukrainian].

Spasybo-Fatieieva I.V. Tsyvilistyka: na shliakhu formuvannia doktryn: vybr. nauk. pr. Kharkiv: Zoloti storinky, 2012.

p. [in Ukrainian].

Yermolenko V.M. Pavovyi rezhym maina fermerskoho hospodarstva. Fermerski hospodarstva yak uchasnyky tsyvilnykh ta zemelnykh pravovidnosyn / za red. І. Spasybo-Fatieievoii. Kharkiv: ЕКUS, 2022. P. 83-110 [in Ukrainian].

Yankova O.S. Pravove rehuliuvannia statutnoho fondu komertsiinykh orhanizatsii: avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03. Donetsk, 2000. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].

Rishennia Cherniakhivskoho raionnoho sudu Zhytomyrskoii oblasti vid 20.07.2023 po spravi No. 293/261/23. URL:

https://opendatabot.ua/court/112332523-317a49e472415278379d5c3e8ad92fe2 [in Ukrainian].

Kravchuk V.M. Korporatyvne pravo: naukovo-praktychnyi komentar zakonodavstva i sudovoii praktyky. Кyiv:

Іstyna, 2005. 720 p. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110966299.bm

Urkevych V. Okremi pravovi pytannia stvorennia fermerskykh hospodarstv. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2011. No. 3. P. 160-162 [in Ukrainian]

Postanova Velykoii palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 18.02.2020 No. 918/335/17. URL: https://lpd.court.gov.ua/home/

search/1336 [in Ukrainian].

Rishennia Hospodarskoho sudu Mykolaiivskoii oblasti vid 10.08.2016 u spravi No. 915/728/16 pro vyznachennia

chastok chleniv FH u skladenomu kapitali. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].

Zelisko A.V. Rozmezhuvannia obiektiv prava vlasnosti fermerskoho hospodarstva ta yoho zasnovnykiv: pytannia

vidpovidnosti doktryny i prartyky. Aktualni problem tsyvilnoho, simeinoho ta mizhnarodnoho prava (Matvieievski

tsyvilistychni chytannia): materialy mizhnar. nauk.-praktych. konf. (м. Кyiiv, 3 zhovt. 2013 r.): у 2 t. Кyiv: Bilotser-

kivdruk, 2013. Т. 1. P. 324-329 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Kasatsiynoho tsyvilnoho sudu Verkhovnoho sudu vid 02.06.2021 No. 372/1075/19. URL: https://lpd.

court.gov.ua/adjudication/5086 [in Ukrainian].

Popko Y.Y. Pravovyy status silskohospodarskykh yurydychnykh osib za tsyvilnym zakonodavstvom Ukraiiny: dys. ...d-ra filosofiii v haluzi prava. Lviv, 2022. 179 p. URL: https://dspace.lvduvs.edu.ua/bitstream/1234567890/4786/1/%

D0%94%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F%20

%D0%9F%D0%9E%D0%9F%D0%9A%D0%9E%20%D0%AE..pdf [in Ukrainian].

Published

2024-11-08

How to Cite

ZELISKO, A. (2024). LEGAL REGIME OF FARM PROPERTY AS AN EFFECTIVE FORM OF AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITY IN THE CURRENT CRISIS CONDITIONS. Economics and Law, 74(3), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2024.03.028