Public History as a Component of “Soft Power” in Modern Society: From the Experience of Australia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2021.05.165

Keywords:

public history, “soft power”, Australia, identity, historical consciousness

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to demonstrate, by the example of Australia, the importance of public history for a state in exerting the “soft power” at the domestic and international political arenas.

The methodology of research is based on the principles of historicism and systemic, also interdisciplinary and comparative approaches. Novelty. Unlike many countries, including Australia, Ukraine still has not reached significant development of the field of public / applied history. Likewise, under-utilized are the resources of “soft power” both within the country and abroad. It’s the first time when the meaning of public history for exercising soft power is explained. Conclusions. At the current stage of global development, competition is gaining a cultural / civilizational dimension, whereof historians are most aware. But prevalently they are stuck in the “ivory tower”, though both the society and the government need their cognitive potential, as deeper knowledge and understanding of the past enhances the quality of decision making for today and for tomorrow. At the same time, any society needs reinforcing its identity, values and cohesion. In both cases, a prominent role belongs to pubic history as part of the “soft power”. The activities of public historians is of great importance for consolidating the society and improving a state’s international image, which brings material and non-material benefits. Within recent years, Australia has risen in the World rating of soft power, entering the top ten of leading countries. Its experience presents undoubted interest to others, particularly Ukraine. This constitutes the practical importance of the results of the survey and outlines the prospects of further studies, envisaging not only purely theoretical theses, but also practical steps in institutionalization, similar to those carried out in Australia: founding the Center for Public History, similar analytical companies, and a respective almanac, where historians and all parties interested could find opportunities for fulfilment, thus amassing the intellectual capital of Ukraine and strengthening its international positioning.

References

Aidarbek, A. (2014). Education and Soft Power: Analysis as an Instrument of Foreign Policy. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 43, 514–516. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.428

Anderson, M., Ashton, P. (1995). Australia’s Heritage in Profile. Melbourne.

Ashton, P., Hamilton, P. (1997). “Streetwise”: Public History in New South Wales. Public History Review, 5-6, 1–8.

Ashton, P. (Ed.). (2009). People and Their Past: Public History Today. London.

Ashton, P. (Ed.). (2019). What is Public History Globally? Working with the Past in the Present. London, New York. doi: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350033306

Ashton, P., Hamilton, Searby R. (2012). Places of the Heart: Memorials in Australia. Melbourne.

"Bieliei, S. (2021). Australian approach to the concept of middle power in its foreign policy.

Botonero, E. M. R. (2013). EU Higher Education as Soft Power in Neighbouring Countries: A Projection of Influence by Compelling Means. ECPR General Conference Sciences Bordeaux 4–7 September 2013, 1–28.

Cauvin, T. (2016). Public History. A Textbook of Practice. New York. doi: https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718255

Chornovol, I. (2010). Istoriohrafiia Avstralii u svitli tezy Ternera. Rehionalna istoriia Ukrainy, 4, 239–248. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Clark, A. (2016). Private Lives, Public History: Navigating Historical Consciousness in Australia. History Compass, January, 14, 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12296

Davison, G. (2000). The Use and Abuse of Australian History. St. Leonards.

Davison, G. (Ed.). (1998). The Oxford Companion to Australian History. Oxford; Melbourne.

Dziuba, R. (2015). Vykorystannia kino v protsesi pleisbrendynhu: pryklad spivpratsi uriadu Avstralii i kinoindustrii. Hrani, 1 (117), 115–119. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.15421/1715021

Gardner, J. P. (Ed.) (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Public History. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199567942.001.0001

Haladzhii, O. (2016). Znachennia AUSFTA u avstraliisko-amerykanskykh vidnosynakh kintsia XX – pochatku XXI st. Amerykanska istoriia ta polityka, 1, 162–167. [in Ukrainian].

Haladzhii, O. (2017). Suziria Pivdennykh moriv: avstraliiskyi shliakh uspishnoi serednoderzhavnosti. Zovnishni spravy, 6 (Istorychni nauky), 10–15. [in Ukrainian].

Hamilton, P., Ashton P. (2000). “Out of Place: On not belonging”. Public History Review, 10, 37–42.

Havryliuk, V. S. (1969). Po Avstralii ta Novii Zelandii. [in Ukrainian].

Honcharenko, M. (1973). Na kulturnykh merydianakh Avstralii ta Okeanii. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Ihnatiev, P. (2014). Avstraliia: povertaiuchys oblychchiam do Azii. Zovnishni spravy, 1 (Istorychni nauky), 30–33; 2, 20–23. [in Ukrainian].

Jordanova, L. (2000). History in Practice. London/Oxford; New York.

Kelly, R. (1978). Public History: Its Origins, Nature and Prospects. The Public Historian, 1, 16–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3377666

Khyzhniak, I. A. (2020). Avstraliia u poshuku vlasnoi bahatopartiinoi systemy (kinets XIX – pochatok XX st.). Problemy vsesvitnoi istorii, 3, 87–99. [in Ukrainian].

Kitchen, N. (2017). Making soft power work: theory and practice in Australia’s international education policy. Politics and Policy, 45 (4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12219

Kovtun, O. (2011). Intehratsiini protsesy ta mizhderzhavni obiednannia Avstralii ta Okeanii. Gileia, 45 (N 3), 685–692. [in Ukrainian].

Liddington, J. (2002). What Is Public History? Publics and Their Pasts, Meanings and Practices. Oral History, 1 (30), 83–93.

Metzgar, E. T. (2015). Institutions of Higher Education as Public Diplomacy Tools. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20, 3, 223–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315604718

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York.

Pashkov, V. (2020). Sfera vyshchoi osvity yak instrument “miakoi syly” u zovnishnii politytsi derzhavy. Zovnishni spravy, 7-8, 48–54. [in Ukrainian].

Perha, T. (2020). Polityka Avstralii shchodo korinnoho naselennia (kinets XIX – persha polovyna XX st.). Problemy vsesvitnoi istorii, 2, 174–200. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202007Statyi17

Romanenko, O. (2020). Stratehii mihratsiinoi polityky Avstralii: etapy, stanovlennia, novi vyklyky ta vidpovidi na suchasni zahrozy. Problemy vsesvitnoi istorii, 3, 152–167. [in Ukrainian].

Romanenko, O. (2021). Rodyna yak tsinnist v Avstralii (vid pershykh poselentsiv do pochatku XX st.). Narodna tvorchist ta etnolohiia, 1 (389), 79–87. [in Ukrainian].

Savelieva I. (2013). “Public History” as a vocation: Basic research program: Working papers. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2279444

Sayer, F. (2015). Public History: A Practical Guide. London; New York.

Stetar, J., Coppla, C., Guo, L., Nabiyeva, N., Ismailov, B. (2010). Soft Power Strategies: Competition and Cooperation in a Globalised System of Higher Education. Higher Education: Policy and the Global Competition Phenomenon, 191–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106130_14

Stoian, P. (2012). Avstraliiski deskryptyvni standarty v systemi avstraliiskykh arkhivnykh resursiv. Studii z arkhivnoi spravy ta dokumentoznavstva, 20, 36–43. [in Ukrainian].

Tkachova, Yu. (2010). Brendinh Avstralii u mizhnarodnykh vidnosynakh (tekhnolohiia prosuvannia natsionalnykh interesiv). Aktualni problemy mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn, 88, 1, 270–271. [in Ukrainian].

"Udod, O. (2021). Mediina istoriia yak vyklyk dlia akademichnoi nauky, suspilstva i osobystosti: sproby protydii nehatyvnym informatsiinym vplyvam. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pedahohichnykh nauk Ukrainy, 3, 1. [in Ukrainian].

Vietrynskyi, I. M. (2020). Istorychni, sotsiokulturni ta mizhnarodno-politychni peredumovy vynyknennia i stanovlennia Avstraliiskoho Soiuzu. Problemy vsesvitnoi istorii, 3, 64–86. [in Ukrainian].

Viter, I. (2020). Derzhavnyi paternalizm ta yoho zarodzhennia v Avstralii na pochatku XX st. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi, 4, 43–51 [in Ukrainian].

Wojciuk, A., Michaiek, M. (2015). Education as a source and tool of soft power in international relations. European Political Science, 14 (3), 1–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.25

Yukhymenko, I. (1966). Shliakhamy Avstralii. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Zernetska, O. (2020). Rozvytok kultury v Avstralii protiahom XX st.: kinoindustriia. Problemy vsesvitnoi istorii, 2, 174–200. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.46869/2707-6776-2020-11-10

Zernetska, O., Myronchuk, O. (2020). Istorychna pamiat ta praktyky monumentalnoi komemoratsii Pershoi svitovoi viiny v Avstralii (chastyna 1). Problemy vsesvitnoi istorii, 2, 204–217. [in Ukrainian].

Published

2021-11-08

How to Cite

Orlova, T. (2021). Public History as a Component of “Soft Power” in Modern Society: From the Experience of Australia. Ukrainian Historical Journal, (5), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2021.05.165

Issue

Section

METHODOLOGY. HISTORIOGRAPHY. SOURCES