Paradigms of European Security in the Foreign Policy of France, Germany, and Great Britain (2014-2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2023.06.268Keywords:
European security, foreign policy, France, Germany, Great Britain, NATO, EU, Russo-Ukrainian warAbstract
The purpose is to investigate the peculiarities of the formation and implementation of the European regional security concepts of France, Germany, and Great Britain in their comparison in the historical context of the foreign policy of these states with an emphasis on the period 2014—2022.
The research methodology was formed by the principles of historicism, systematicity and impartiality, general scientific methods of logic, comparative analysis, and special historical methods (historiographical analysis, historical-systemic, chronology, historical-genetic, retrospective analysis, comparative-historical).
The scientific novelty lies in the study of the implementation history of the theoretical approaches of France, Germany, and Great Britain to the European regional security policy in the context of the history of their foreign policy in a comparative dimension. The transformation of three national paradigms of European security in the context of changes in the system of modern international relations in the conditions of the Russo-Ukrainian war, which actually began in 2014, was traced. Particular attention is paid to the influence of these paradigms on Ukraine’s international position and changes in the system of international relations and European security.
Conclusions. Throughout the entire history of European integration, each of the three leading states of Western Europe tried to realize leadership ambitions in regional politics in their own special way, compensating for the loss of global status. France, Germany, and Great Britain represent different paradigms of foreign policy — Eurocentric, Euro-Atlantic (intermediate), and Atlantic, respectively. Throughout the development of the EU’s security policy, France and Germany played the role of apologists and initiators of reforms, while Great Britain played the role of an antagonist of integration. The process of forming the EU’s foreign and security policy was reduced to the search for a compromise, which led to its incompleteness. Differences in views on the European integration of political elites did not allow the three states to form an effective regional security core without the participation of the United States. Even in the studied period of 2014—2022, marked by a sharp aggravation of the crisis of the European security system, differences between Great Britain, France and Germany remained insurmountable regarding the current problems of international relations. Current events related to Ukraine and the mechanisms of their resolution were no exception. Although the large-scale aggression of Russia against Ukraine in 2022 contributed to the consolidation of the views and approaches of the politicians of the vast majority of Western states regarding the need to review the system of regional policy and oppose Russian aggression, the Russo-Ukrainian war illustrates the problems of preserving the conflictual nature of the interaction of existing European security paradigms and leaves open the question of the possibility of forming a new, effective comprehensive system of regional security in the short term without a final answer.
References
Bzhezinskyi, Z. (2019). Velyka shakhivnytsia: Amerykanska pershist ta yii heostratehichni imperatyvy. Kyiv: Fabula. [in Ukrainian].
Seil, T. E. (2023). Mitsnyi alians: Istoriia NATO y hlobalnoho pisliavoiennoho poriadku. Kharkiv: Fabula. [in Ukrainian].
Lehne, S. (2012. July).The Big Three in EU Foreign Policy / The Carnegie Papers. Washington.
"Romanova, O. V. (2008). Foreign policy strategies of France, Germany and the Great Britain in the context of development and implementation of the CFSP of the EU: candidate diss. of the political sci. Odesa. [in Ukrainian].
Martynov, A. Yu. (2009). Spilna zovnishnia ta oboronna polityka Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu (90-ti rr. XX st. — 10-ti rr. XXI st.): Pohliad z Ukrainy. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN. [in Ukrainian].
Hrubinko, A. V. (2017). Velyka Brytaniia v systemi yevropeiskoi zovnishnoi i bezpekovoi polityky (1990-2016 rr.). Ternopil. [in Ukrainian].
Hrubinko, A. V., Martynov, A. Yu. (2021). Yevropeiskyi Soiuz pislia Brexit: prodovzhennia istorii. Ternopil. [in Ukrainian].
Grant, Ch. (2002). Can Britain lead in Europe? London. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-20034-1_33
Parker, G., Blitz, J. (2010. November 1). Cameron aims for pivotal European role. The Financial Times.
Krushynskyi, V. Yu. (2003). Brytanska Yevropa chy yevropeiska Brytaniia: Velykobrytaniia v yevropeiskykh intehratsiinykh protsesakh. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Yakovenko, N. L. (2003). Velyka Brytaniia v suchasnii systemi mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn: zaiavka na yevropeiske liderstvo. Kyiv: Naukovyi svit. [in Ukrainian].
Yampolska, L. M. (2004). Integration processes in Europe and Great Britain (1973-1997) (Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
"Simon, L. (2013. May 1). The 2013 French defence White Paper: do not write France off just yet. European Geostrategy.
Shapovalova, A. I. (2009). The European Policy of France under Jacques Chirac Presidency (Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Ischinger, W. (2013. November 29). Germanys foreign policy lacks big ideas. The Guardian.
Karakuts, A. M. (2010). Zovnishnia polityka Nimechchyny naprykintsi 1980-kh — na pochatku 1990-kh rr. Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu im. Petra Mohyly. Seriia: Istoriia. 129 (116): 86-90. [in Ukrainian].
Kondratiuk, S. V. (2008). Yevropeiska polityka obiednanoi Nimechchyny. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
"Kravchenko, V. V. (2011). The policy of France in the field of security and defense (1994-2008): dys. … kand. ist. nauk: spets. 07.00.02. Donetsk. [in Ukrainian].
Harries, M. (2012). Britain and France as Nuclear Partners. Survival. February-March. 54 (1): 7-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2012.657528
"Gomis, B. (2014. February 11). The European implications of Franco-British defence cooperation. European Geostratey.
Hrubinko, A. V. (2010). Vplyv brytano-frantsuzkoho viiskovo-politychnoho spivrobitnytstva na formuvannia i rozvytok spilnoi polityky bezpeky i oborony YeS. Naukovyi visnyk Dyplomatychnoi akademii Ukrainy. Kyiv: DEMID. 16: 139-149. [in Ukrainian].
"Tiushka, A. V. (2010). The Franco-German cooperation regime within the European Security and Defence Policy (Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis). Lviv. [in Ukrainian].
Larres, K. (1996). Integrating Europe or Ending the Cold War? Churchill’s post-war foreign policy. Journal of European Integration History. 2 (1): 15-50.
"(1990. January 20).German unification: No. 10 memorandum of conversation (MT and President Mitterrand). Letter from Mr. Powell (no. 10) to Mr. Wall [WRL 020/1] Secret and Personal. 10 Downing Street. Margaret Th atcher Foundation. Thatcher Archive (Cabinet Office).
Keohane, D. (2004). Europes new defence agency. London: Centre for European Reform. Policy briefing.
Tetcher, M. (2003). Iskusstvo upravlenyia gosudarstvom: Strategii dlia meniaiushchegosia mira. Moscow. [in Russian].
Zavoritnia, H. (2006). Pytannia politychnoho liderstva v yevropeiskii bezpekovii ta oboronnii politytsi. Istoryko-politychni problemy suchasnoho svitu. Chernivtsi: Ruta. 12-13: 177-182. [in Ukrainian].
"(2019. 22 Janvier). Traite entre la Republique Francaise et la Republique Federale d’Allemagne sur la Cooperation et l’Integration franco-allemandes. Elysee. [in French].
"(2022. 9 travnia). Makron kazhe, shcho vstup Ukrainy do YeS mozhe zatiahnutysia na roky — proponuie stvoryty novu spilnotu. Ukrinform. [in Ukrainian].
"(2022. January 21). Foreign Secretary Liz Truss speech to the Lowy Institute. Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.
"(2023. 10 kvitnia). Makron u Kytai, abo (Marni) Sproby pryborkaty drakona. Lb.ua. [in Ukrainian].


