The Regulatory Framework of Innovative Structures: A Comparative Analysis of Ukraine, Europe, and the U.S.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2026.02.003Keywords:
innovation structures, technology park, cluster, legislation, science park, business incubator, technology transfer, smart specialization, industrial park, innovation policyAbstract
The article contains results of a study devoted to the evolution and the current forms of regulation of innovative structures in Ukraine and abroad. Innovative structures in Ukraine (technoparks, science parks, industrial parks, business incubators, clusters, and technology platforms) are interpreted as institutional forms capable of ensuring sustainable innovation-driven development of the economy; a detailed overview of their regulation and key features is provided. Patterns of the innovative structures’ evolution as institutions of the innovation-driven development were revealed, analysis of their legal models in different countries was made, with the efficiency assessment of the respective legal regimes. A comparative legal analysis of the Ukrainian legislation with the U.S. and EU approaches to innovation infrastructure building and support was conducted. It is argued that the Ukrainian model rests upon regulation specific to the categories of innovation infrastructure, whereas Western models rely primarily on flexible legal instruments, public-private partnerships, and financial incentives. A detailed overview of the innovation infrastructure categories in the U.S. (e.g. university technoparks, industrial parks and regional clusters, business incubators and startup ecosystems, and technological clusters) and EU practices (e.g. the earliest European technoparks, regulatory specifics pertaining to innovative structures at the EU level, legislations of selected EU countries on innovative structures, and the key EU directives on technoparks) is given. Special attention is devoted to a comparison of approaches to providing legal support for the innovation infrastructure in Ukraine, Europe, and the U.S., to determine the factors behind the success of such structures in different jurisdictions. Also, the study aims at identifying the problems in the Ukrainian regulatory framework and substantiating its improvements in the European integration context. Factors contributing to the inefficiency of the innovative structures established in Ukraine were revealed. Fragmentation of the Ukrainian regulatory framework is emphasized, with outlining the steps towards its harmonization with European approaches, particularly regarding the development of cluster policy, technology transfer, and smart specialization. It is concluded that the Ukrainian legislation on innovation activities requires a comprehensive modernization with reference to best European and American practices, to build an effective national innovation system.
References
Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology, Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.
Yefremova, K.V. (2017). Legal foundations of the national innovation system. Law and Innovations, 1 (17), 9—13 [in Ukrainian].
Kuznetsova, N.S. (2019). Technological parks as a subject of legal regulation in Ukraine. Yurydychnyi Visnyk Ukrainy, 7, 14—18 [in Ukrainian].
Fedosova, A. H. (2021). Legal problems of the development of business incubators as a form of state support of entrepreneurship. South Ukrainian Law Journal, 3 (1), 52—59. https://doi.org/10.32850/sulj.2021.3.1.9 [in Ukrainian].
Deineko, L.M., Kolomiiets, Y.Y., & Prudkyi, I.I. (2018). The Innovation policy: Ukrainian realities and European orientations. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].
Podrez-Riapolova, I.V. (2020). Application of the innovative smart specializations approach for regional development in Ukraine. Law and Innovations, 1 (29), 46— 51. https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2020-1(29)-5 [in Ukrainian].
Pavlenko, A.M. (2021). A comparative legal analysis of innovation legislation of the EU and Ukraine. Judicial Science, 5, 60—66 [in Ukrainian].
Balanchuk, I. S., & Mykhalchenkova, O. Ye. (2021). Technological platforms in the field of innovation — trends in Europe and Ukraine. Science, Technologies, Innovations, 2, 14—24. https://doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2021-2-03 [in Ukrainian]
Bertamino, F., Bronzini, R., De Maggio, M., & Revelli, D. (2017). Regional policies for innovation: the case of technology districts in Italy. Regional Studies, 51 (12). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1255321
Bellini, N., Teräs, J., & Ylinenpää, H. (2012). Science and Technology Parks in the Age of Open Innovation. The Finnish Case. Symphonya. Emerging Issues of Management, 1, 25—44. https://doi.org/10.4468/2012.1.03bellini.teras.ylinenpaa
Simonen, J., Herala, J., & Svento, R. (2020). Creative destruction and creative resilience: Restructuring of the Nokia dominated high-tech sector in the Oulu region. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 12 (5), 931—954. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12267
Kaplynsky, O.V., & Soloviyov, V.P. (2017). Legal framework for the American science and technology leadership. Science and Science of Science, 1 (95), 92—104. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2017.01.092 [in Ukrainian].
Popovych, O. S. (2019). The science, technology and innovation policy: basic mechanisms of formation and implementation. Kyiv: Dobrov Institute for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Popovych, O., Popovych, Z., Mischuk, O., Kostrytsia, O., Kavunenko, L., Chernogaeva, O., Lytvynko, A., Mushkalo, Yu., Klimenkova, V., Vasilieva, O., Onopriyenko, M., Velenteichyk, Т., Khomenko, Yu., Prymachenko, S., Khorevin, V., Zhyvaga, O., Borozdykh, N., Koretskyi, A., Tkach, D., Ryzhko, L., & Bessalova, T. (2025). Ukrainian Science and Technology Foresight: Strategic Directions and Prospects for the Development of Science and Technology. Kyiv: Dobrov Institute for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies of the NAS of Ukraine. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14814096
Androshchuk, H.O., Zhyliaiev, I.B., Chyzhevskyi, B.H., & Shevchenko M.M. (2009). The innovation development strategy of Ukraine for 2010—2020 in the context of globalization challenges. Kyiv: Parlamentary Publishing [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Akademperiodyka of the NAS of Ukraine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



