Mechanisms and Tools to Improve Science and Technology Policy in the Context of the Science-Centric Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2025.04.099Keywords:
science-centric policy, R&D-focused development, intangible assets, scientific and technological innovation activity, R&D intensity, publication and patent activity, intangible asset capacity, globalization processes, economic system.Abstract
The need for the earliest possible development and implementation in Ukraine of a new model for science & technology and innovation policy with a radically higher level of science centricity is substantiated. The features of such a policy model in the science & innovation development context were identified. The source base of the study is scientific works of domestic and foreign authors, legislative and regulatory documents, and global and national statistical data. The historical and methodological context of the science-centric model of science & technology and innovation policy was explored. It was shown that the ideology of the science-centric concept of the model for societal development and accretion of public benefits was developed in the works of F. Bacon, and further elaborated by G. M. Dobrov, the founder of the Kyiv School for Science Studies. An integral index developed within the concept of intangible assets was used to measure the science-centricity level of science & technology and innovation policy. The research and development (R&D) intensity as a complex intangible characteristic of the country’s economy in the context of globalization processes in the economic and science & technology spheres was analyzed. An analysis of the R&D intensity in Ukraine compared to leading economies showed that Ukraine needed a new model of science & technology and innovation policy with a stronger science centricity, which would be capable of changing established downward trends in the R&D intensity of the domestic economic system and the human potential in the intellectual property field. This will create a socio-economic background favorable for building up an effective R&D-focused national economic system. The new model should take into account the dynamics of R&D intensification at the global level, in the main science & technology centers (USA, EU, Japan, China, and India), and in individual leading economies. The mechanisms and tools crucial for implementing the new model should be based on the relationships between science & innovation components of the economic system, such as R&D spending and the number of researchers, and on these components’ impact on capacity building of intangible assets and Ukraine’s readiness for future R&D-intensive production in the context of globalization processes.
References
Malitskyi, B.A. (2023). Наукоцентрична державна політика: необхідний та ефективний інструмент покращення умов життя в Україні. Science and Science of Science, (1)119, 18–34. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2023.01.018 [in Ukrainian].
Malitskyi, B.A. (2024). Квантова особливість наукового знання: евристичний погляд. Science and Science of Science, (1)123, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2024.01.003 [in Ukrainian].
Bacon, F. (1977). Collected Works in Two Volumes (2nd ed., revised and supplemented). Moscow: Mysl, Vol. 1. [in Russian].
Bacon, F. (1978). Collected Works in Two Volumes (2nd expanded and additional ed.). Moscow: Mysl, Vol. 2. [in Russian].
Dobrov, G.M. (1966). Science about science. Introduction to general science of science. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. [In Russian].
Bernal, J.D., & Mackay, A.L. (1966). Towards a science of science. Problems of Philosophy, (7), 154–160. [in Russian].
Dobrov, G.M. (2014). On the prediction of development of science. Science and Science of Science, (1)83, 3–14. [in Russian].
Romer, P.M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), Pt. 2: The Problem of Development: A Conference of the Institute for the Study of Free Enterprise Systems, S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725 URL: https://web.stanford.edu/~klenow/Romer_1990.pdf (accessed: 29.12.2025).
Krylov, D.V. (2022). Analysis of the rating assessment of the development of innovative activity in Ukraine. Effective Economy, (5). https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2022.5.8 [in Ukrainian].
Golovatyuk, V.M. (2022). The readiness of a national economy to future production in the context of R&D intensity of GDP. Science and Science of Science, (4)118, 3–31. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2022.04.003 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Akademperiodyka Publishing House of the NAS of Ukraine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



