ЗДІЙСНЕННЯ «ЗЕЛЕНИХ» ПУБЛІЧНИХ ЗАКУПІВЕЛЬ: ПОТЕНЦІЙНІ ПЕРЕВАГИ ТА ВИКЛИКИ ДЛЯ УКРАЇНИ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2018.03.003Ключові слова:
публічні закупівлі, «зелені» публічні закупівлі, державна екологічна політика, «горизонтальні» цілі, сталий розвитокАнотація
Досліджено основні виклики, які можуть постати перед Україною під час запровадження та здійснення «зелених» публічних закупівель, зокрема конфлікт «традиційної» цілі публічних закупівель із «горизонтальною» ціллю з охорони навколишнього середовища, у т. ч. більша вартість «зелених» закупівель, дискримінація учасників у «зелених» закупівлях і потенційні обмеження замовника у визначенні критеріїв оцінки тендерних пропозицій, наприклад пов’язаність із предметом договору про закупівлю. Зосереджено увагу на потенційних перевагах «зелених» закупівель і розроблено відповідні пропозиції.
Посилання
Public procurement as a tool for promoting more sustainable consumption and production patterns: Sustainable development. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2008. URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/no5.pdf
Buying green! (3rd edition). European Commission. 2011. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/Buying-GreenHandbook-3rd-Edition.pdf
GPP National Action Plans. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/action_plan_en.htm
Harmonisation of Public Procurement System in Ukraine with EU Standards 2016. Report on Green Procurement Manual. URL: http://eupublicprocurement.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/REPORT-ON-GREEN_PROCUREMENT_MANUAL_ENG.pdf
Kunzlik P. From suspect practice to market-based instrument: policy alignment and the evolution of EU law’s approach to “green” public procurement. Public Procurement Law Review. 2013. No. 3. P. 97—115.
Aldenius M., Khan J. Strategic use of green procurement in the bus sector: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Clea ner Production. 2017. No. 164. P. 250—257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.196
Chernykhivska A. “Zeleni” derzhavni zakupivli yak stratehichnyi instrument sotsialno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. 2014. Iss. 8. Ch. 2. P. 161—164 [in Ukrainian].
Konashchuk N. Vykorystannia “zelenykh” kryteriiv pid chas zdiisnennia publichnykh zakupivel. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”, seriia “Ekonomika”. 2016. No. 3(31). P. 133—136 [in Ukrainian].
Turchenko O. Vprovadzhennia stiikykh (“zelenykh”) zakupivel: zarubizhnyi dosvid. Pravnychyi chasopys Donetskoho universytetu. 2016. No. 1/2. P. 73—80 [in Ukrainian].
Arrowsmith S. Horizontal policies in public procurement: a taxonomy. Journal of public procurement. 2010. Vol. 10. Iss. 2. P. 149—186. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-10-02-2010-B001
Lundberg S., Marklund P. Green public procurement and multiple environmental objectives. Economia e Politica Industriale. 2018. Vol. 45. Iss. 1. P. 37—53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-017-0085-6
Proposal for Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement. COM(2011)869 final. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0896:FIN:EN:PDF
Monti M. Report to the President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroso on a new strategy for the single market. At the service of Europe’s economy and society. 2010. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/strategy/docs/monti_report_final_10_05_2010_en.pdf
Case C-368/10, Commission v. Kingdom of the Netherlands: [2012] E.C.R. n.y.r. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62010CJ0368
Nsiah-Asare E., Prempeh K.B. Measuring of Ensuring Value for Money in Public Procurement: a Case of Selected Polytechnics in Ghana. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. 2016. URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70051/1/MPRA_paper_70051.pdf
What is value for money? URL: https://www.felp.ac.uk/taxonomy/term/461
What is best value for money? URL: https://www.finance-ni.gov.uk/articles/definition-best-value-money
Lundberg S., Marklund P. Green public procurement as an environmental policy instrument: cost effectiveness. Environmental Economics. 2013. Vol. 4. Iss. 4. P. 75—83.
Oko-Institut & ICLEI. Study on costs/benefits of Green public procurement in Europe, Part 1: Comparison of the Life Cycle Costs of Green and Non Green Products. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/eu_recommendations_1.pdf
EU GPP criteria. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/eu_gpp_criteria_en.htm
Iraldo F., Nucci B., Giacomo M.R. The relevance of life cycle costing in green public procurement. Economics and Policy of Energy and Environment. 2016. No. 1. P. 91—109. https://doi.org/10.3280/EFE2016-001005
Weller C., Pritchard J.M. Evolving CJEU Jurisprudence: Balancing Sustainability Considerations with the Requirements of the Internal Market. European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review. 2013. No. 1. P. 55-59. https://doi.org/10.21552/EPPPL/2013/1/165
Case C-379/98, PreussenElektra AG v Schleswag AG [2001] ECR I-2099. URL: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-379/98
Case 45/87, Commission v Ireland [1988] ECR 04929. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61987CJ0045
Arrowsmith S., Kunzlik P. Public procurement and horizontal policies in EC law: general principles in Arrowsmith and Kunzlik. Social and Environmental Policies in EC Procurement Law: New Directives and New Directions: monograph. Eds. S. Arrowsmith, P. Kunzlik. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009. P. 9—54. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576041.004
Case C-513/99, Concordia Bus Finland: [2002] E.C.R. I-07213. Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-513/99
Opinion of Advocate General Mischo. Case C-513/99 - Concordia Bus Finland Oy Ab v Helsingin Kaupunki and HkIBussiliikenne. 2001. para. 150. URL: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d2dc30dd3ec6641d6ab042baac51f70bbce43a3a.e34KaxiLc3qMb40Rch0SaxuPa3r0?text=&docid=46971&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=99860
Case C-448/01, EVN AG and Wienstrom GmbH v Republic Austria [2003] E.C.R. I-14527. URL: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?docid=71234&doclang=EN
Martens M., Margerie S. The Link to the Subject-Matter of the Contract in Green and Social Procurement. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review. 2013. Vol. 8. Iss. 1. P. 8—18. https://doi.org/10.21552/EPPPL/2013/1/158
Andrecka M., Mitkidis K.P. Sustainability requirements in EU public and private procurement — a right or an obligation? 2017. URL: https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/NJCL/article/download/1982/1536
Green paper on the modernization of EU public procurement policy Towards a more efficient European Procurement Market. European Commission. COM/2011/0015 final. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2011:0015:FIN
Semple A. The Link to the Subject-Matter: A Glass Ceiling for Sustainable Public Contracts? URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2565051
Act on Promotion of Procurement of Eco-Friendly Goods and Services by the State and Other Entities (Act on Promoting Green Procurement). URL: https://www.env.go.jp/en/laws/policy/green/index.html (last accessed: 28.07.2018).
Policy on Green Procurement. URL: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32573
A sampling of successes in green public procurement. Case studies of green public procurement implementation in Asia-Pacific countries. 2017. URL: http://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/sites/default/files/downloads/best-practices/UNEP_ sampling_successes_green_public_procurement_case_studies.pdf
