The Participation of Russian Geographers in the Military Activities of Their State: From the Past to the Present
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2025.02.048Keywords:
scientific geographical community, military factor in the development of science, totalitarian state, the evolution of science in Russia, metageographyAbstract
The Russian scientific geographical community has consistently supported its aggressive regime throughout the entire duration of the war against Ukraine. The war is redefining the perception of science and altering the representation of the scientific community. Putin’s Russia presents a recent illustration of this impact within the Russian scientific community. An in-depth examination of Russian geographical science during the era of Putinism holds substantial relevance beyond mere abstraction. In the case of Ukraine, a distinct practical context exists. The scientific geographical community in the Russian Federation has demonstrated a notable lack of effectiveness. The extensive body of Russian research concerning Ukraine has resulted in the development of a fundamentally incorrect image of the neighboring country. Russia’s aggression towards another state consistently presents a “rationale” that appears to be grounded in systematic analysis. The process of making decisions about wars in Russia is characterized by its duration and collective nature. The involvement of the scientific community is significant in this matter. The area of the prospective victim is thoroughly analyzed. For many decades, Russian geographers have consistently been ahead of the Russian army. An examination of the scientific geographical research conducted within the Russian state can provide useful information about the actions and strategies this state may employ concerning neighboring territories. The post-Soviet space does not have an integrated scientific geographical community that functions solely as a professional association. Russian geographers do not operate as colleagues; they consistently act in support of their aggressive state and engage in its military conflicts. The engagement of Russian geographers in the execution of assertive initiatives under Putin’s leadership aligns with anticipated trends. The Russian scientific geographical community exhibits a range of strengths and weaknesses. This serves as a focal point for Ukrainian experts in the fields of science about science and geographical science to conduct their research.
References
Nikolaenko, D. (1982). Introduction to the Metatheory of Metageography. Moscow: All-Russian Institute of Science and Technology Information of the Russian Academy of Sciences [in Russian].
Nikolaenko, D. (2002). Dynamics of Images of Science. Works (Vol. 5). Saint Petersburg: Amadeus [in Russian].
Pearson, C. (2008). Scarred Landscapes. War and Nature in Vichy France. Springer nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230228733
Lapno, M. et al. (Eds.). (1985). Soviet Geographers — Front and Rear (1941— 1945). Issues of Geography, 128, 25—30 [in Russian].
Olson, K. (2024). The Secret Toxic Legacies of Chemical Warfare: Agent Blue Use during the 2nd Indochina and Vietnam Wars in Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (1961 to 1971). Open Journal of Soil Science, 14, 689—725. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2024.1411034
Olson, K. (2025). Historical Lesson: Environmental and Human Impacts of Cluster Bomb Use by the United States during the Second Indochina War. Open Journal of Soil Science, 15, 1—21. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2025.151001
Milutin, D.A. (1846). Critical Study of the Significance of Military Geography and Military Statistics. St. Petersburg: Military Printing House [in Russian].
Milutin, D.A. (1847). The First Experiments in Military Statistics (Vol. 1—2). St. Petersburg: Printing House of Military Educational Institutions, 1 [in Russian].
Milutin, D.A. (1848). The First Experiments in Military Statistics (Vol. 1—2). St. Petersburg: Printing House of Military Educational Institutions, 2 [in Russian].
Mallinson, W., & Ristic, Z. (2016). The Threat of Geopolitics to International Relations: Obsession with the Heartland. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kolosov, V.A. (2012). Post-Soviet Borders: Specificity, Cross-Border Interactions, and Security. Geographical Position and Territorial Structures. In Memory of I. M. Maergoiz. Moscow: Novy Khronograf, 601—630 [in Russian].
Kolosov, V.A., Zotova, M.V., & Sebentsov, A.B. (2016). The Barrier Function of Russian Borders. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series Geography, 5, 8—20 [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2016-5-8-20
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Akademperiodyka of the NAS of Ukraine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



