Management of Recreational Innovation Enterprises: The Homeostatic Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2021.01.003Keywords:
homeostasis, homeostatic approach, Industry 4.0, recreational innovative enterprises, management.Abstract
The main purpose of the article is to explore the applicability of the homeostatic approach to the management of innovation enterprises in recreation (IERs), with constructing IERs in the Industry 4.0 context. The methodological framework of the study is general and special methods of scientific cognition, determined by the purpose and logic of problem solution in applications of homeostatic control of IERs to ensure their development and functional stability. The scientific results are obtained using systemic and homeostatic approaches, the concept of hierarchical management, methods of adaptation, graphical method. The features of bipolar homeostatic management, covering management through goals and contradictions between them, are highlighted, and a model for homeostatic management of IERs, based on management of region-specific or industry-specific innovation processes in recreation. The homeostatic approach to management of the main organizational segments of IERs, management and marketing, is proposed, which will provide for effective interactions of the these functional systems and homeostasis (sustainable operation) of IERs. The essence of management in the organizational operation of IERs is referred to as management of people to support their effort in carrying out professional tasks, and the essence of marketing is management of customer relations. Considering long-term contradictions between recreational and industrial spheres in recreational regions, the above mentioned will allow to develop a strategy for managing the sustainable development of IERs; to build intelligent information systems relying on IERs, able to synthesize natural and artificial intelligence and computerize the processes of making optimal management decisions.
References
Alcácer, V., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2019). Scanning the Industry 4.0: A Literature Review on Technologies for Manufacturing Systems. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 22, 899—919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.006
Pereira, A.C., & Romero, F. (2017). A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1206—1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.032
Horskyi, Yu.M., Stepanov, A.M., & Tieslinov, A.G. (2008). Homeostatics harmony in the game of contradictions. Irkutsk: Reporter A1, 634 [in Russian].
Odrekhivskyi, M. (2009). Marketing-oriented management of recreational innovative enterprises. Drohobych: RV DDPU, 488 [in Ukrainian].
Novoseltsev, V.N. (1973). Homeostasis Control Systems. Automation and telemechanics, 5, 98—114 [in Russian].
Pavlenko, E. & Zegzhda, D. (2018). Homeostatic approach to assessing digital manufacturing security. IV International Scientific Conference “The Convergence of Digital and Physical Worlds: Technological, Economic and Social Challenges” (CC-TESC2018), vol. 44, issue 66. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184400066
Piddubnyi, I.O., & Piddubna, L.I. (2019). Homeostatic mechanism of coordination of results in the system of international economic activity of the enterprise. Bulletin of Transport Economics and Industry, 66, 109—120 [in Ukrainian].
Vargas, P., Moioli, R., Leandro, N. de Castro, Timmis, J., Neal, M. & Fernando, J. Von Zuben (2005). Artificial Homeostatic System: A Novel Approach. In: 8th European Conference on Artificial Life. Canterbury, UK, September 5—9. (pp. 754—764). https://doi.org/10.1007/1155309076
Damasio, A. & Damasio, H. (2016). Exploring the concept of homeostasis and considering its implications for economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 125—129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.12.003
Heydebrand, W.V. (2008). Organizational Contradictions in Public Bureaucracies: Toward a Marxian Theory of Organizations. Sociological Quarterly, 1, 83—107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1976.tb01890.x
Boniface, M, Mitchell, N.& Rashmi, M. (2012). Three Alternatives to Organizational Value Change and Formation. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48 (3), 380—409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886311428435
Rafferty, A.E., Jimmieson, N.L., Armenakis, A.A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 39 (1), 110—135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457417
Kiesnere, A.L. & Baumgartner, R.J. (2019). Sustainability Management in Practice: Organizational Change for Sustainability in Smaller Large-Sized Companies in Austria. Sustainability, 11, 1—40. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030572
Griffiths, A. & Petrick, J.A. (2001). Corporate architectures for sustainability. Journal of Operations & Production Management 21(12), 1573—1585. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110410919
Sroufe, R. (2017). Integration and organizational change towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 315—329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.180
Shpak, N., Odrekhivskyi, M., Lytvyn, I., & Zalizna, L. (2019). Problems of management of foreign economic activity of innovative systems. Bulletin of the National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”. Series: Economics, 1, 84—91. https://doi.org/10.20998/2519-4461.2019.1.84 [in Ukrainian].
Oberemok, I.I., & Oberemok, N.V. (2014). Interaction of functional management systems of a company within the framework of a homeostatic project management system. Management of complex systems development, 20, 43—47 [in Russian].
Meskon, M.H., Albert, M., Khedouri, F. (1993). Fundamentals of Management. Transl. from English. Moscow: Delo, 702 [in Russian].
Tulenkov, I.V. (1998). Introduction to the theory and practice of management. Kyiv: MAUP, 319 [in Russian].
Kotler, F., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J., & Wong, V. (1998). Marketing Essentials: 2nd European Edition. Transl. from English. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kiev: Publishing House “Vilyams”, 1056 [in Russian].
Odrekhivskyi, M. (2009). Assessment and forecasting of states and sustainability of development of valeological innovative structures. Economic Cybernetics, 3—4(57—58), 90—98 [in Ukrainian].
Odrekhivskyi, M. (2000). Methodological aspects of organizational design of innovative enterprises. Regional economy, 3, 88—93 [in Ukrainian].
Yeshchenko, P.S. & Arseenko, A.G. (2011). A new paradigm of economic development — an urgent challenge of our time. Economics and Forecasting, 1, 28—47 [in Ukrainian].
Burlutsky, S.V. Social partnership and corporate responsibility: a homeostatic approach. Retrieved from http://ir.kneu.edu.ua:8080/bitstream/2010/5113/1/120—125.pdf (last accessed: 19.05.2020).
Stuler, I.Yu. (2016). Institutional principles of changing the concepts of homeostasis as a basic basis for development at the present stage. Black Sea Economic Studies, 4, 102—108 [in Ukrainian].
Stuler, I.Yu. (2016). Estimation of efficiency of the forecasted development of national economy under the conditions of homeostasis. Actual Problems of Economics, 10, 102—108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intele.2017.03.003 [in Ukrainian].
Shtuler, I.Yu. (2016). Substantiation of the model of homeostasis of the national economic system under the conditions of innovative development. Odessa National University Herald. Economy, 21, 7—2(49), 52—57 [in Ukrainian].
Yermoshenko, M.M. (2009). A new paradigm of economic science in the context of development in the conditions of Ukraine’s information economy. Actual problems of economics, 1, 14—20 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Science and Science of Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
