Science in the Dimension of Practical Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2025.01.075Abstract
The article presents the results of the analysis of science from the point of view of the concept of practical philosophy of science and communicative philosophy. The novelty of the article lies in the extension of the approaches of practical philosophy to modern science, which makes it possible to consider the impact of science on society and the implementation of scientific knowledge from the point of view of communicative philosophy. The analysis was carried out using the ontological, epistemological and synergistic approaches of practical philosophy of science. The introduction of modern science into the communicative, axiological and transcendental dimensions of practical philosophy involves the application of methods of communicative philosophy, transcendental and axiological approaches to it. The sources of the analysis of modern science in the dimension of practical philosophy are the study of transcendental pragmatics, axiological and communicative dimensions of modern practical philosophy. The practical philosophy of science is considered, in particular the synergistic conceptual foundations of the modern ontology of science. The features of the implementation of scientific knowledge into social practices are identified. It is determined that the concept of practical philosophy of science is associated with the implementation of synergistic models. The technological dimension of the implementation of scientific knowledge into social practices is shown, which reveals the image of science as a science of discoveries and technologies. Various ways of implementing the results of scientific research are analyzed. It is proven that the practical dimension of science is associated with the implementation of knowledge and the knowledge economy. The significance of cognitive products for the transformation of the ontology of the information society is revealed. It is concluded that scientific research from the point of view of modern practical philosophy allows introducing communicative, ontological and axiological approaches to the analysis of the implementation of scientific knowledge into social practices. The need to deepen the consideration of the ontological dimension of communications and discourses by implementing knowledge and cognitive values into communicative practice is substantiated.References
Rubanets, O.M. (2006). Information Society: Cognitive Creativity of Post-NonClassical Research. Kyiv: PARAPAN Publishing House [in Ukrainian].
Rubanets, O. (2019). Transformation concept “Information technologies” in modern scientific discourse. Transfer of Innovative Technologies, 2, 60—67. https://doi.org/10.31493/tit1921.0301
Dobronravova, I.S. (2017). Theoretical reconstruction of nonlinear phenomena: epistemological
foundations and scientific discourse. Philosophy of Education, 1 (20), 30—42 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2017-20-1-30-42
Dobronravova, I. (2017). Practical philosophy of science: collection of scientific works. Sumy: University book [in Ukrainian].
Kochubey N.V., Nesterova M.O. (Eds.) (2023). Man in a complex world. Sumy: University Book [in Ukrainian].
UNESCO (2005). Report by the director-general on an intersectoral strategy on philosophy. URL:
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000138673 (last accessed: 10.01.2025).
UNESCO (2006). Intersectoral strategy on philosophy. URL:
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000145270 (last accessed: 10.01.2025).
Hübner, K. (2002). Kritik der wissenschaftlichen Vernunft. Karl-Alber-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783495993699
Malakhov, V. (2009). The сode of ethics of a scientist: axiology and pragmatics. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr., 5, 12—19 [in Ukrainian].
Melnychenko, A. (2016). The code of honor as a tool for maintaining academic honesty of a
scientist and educator. Academic honesty as the basis of sustainable university development. Kyiv: Takson,
—182 [in Ukrainian].
Gosle, V. (1999). Transcendental pragmatics as the Fichteanism of intersubjectivity. Yermolenko, A.M. Communicative practical philosophy. Part II. Selected texts. Kyiv: Libra, 456–478 [in Ukrainian].
Apel, K.-O. (1999). Ecological crisis as a challenge to discursive ethics. Yermolenko, A.M Communicative practical philosophy. Part II. Selected texts. Kyiv: Libra, 413— 454 [in Ukrainian].
Yermolenko, A.M. (1999). Communicative practical philosophy. Selected texts. Kyiv: Libra [in Ukrainian].
Husserl, E. (2002). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology.
Philosophical Thought, 3, 134—149 [in Ukrainian].
Husserl, E. (2021). Cartesian meditations. Introduction to phenomenology. Kyiv: Tempora [in Ukrainian].
Rubanets, O.M. (2022). The cognitive sphere of a society and a human: information, mentality, identity. Sumy: University book [in Ukrainian].
Muratova, I.A. (2019). Technology: universalizing and unifying the social being. Kyiv: Millennium [in Ukrainian].
Kochubey, N., & Nesterova, M. (Eds.) (2019). Cognitive technologies in education and social
practice: possibilities of application. Lambert Academic Publishing [in Ukrainian].
Habermas, J. (1996). Communicative action and discourse. Sources of communicative philosophy. Kyiv: Lybid, 84—91 [in Ukrainian].
Baudrillard, J. (2004). Simulacra and simulation. Trans. from French. Kyiv: Solomiya Pavlychko’s Publishing House “Osnovy” [in Ukrainian].
Debord, G. (2021). The Society of the Spectacle. Cambridge: Unredacted Word. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1453m69
Kittler, F. (2009). Towards an Ontology of Media. Theory, Culture and Society, 26, 23—31.https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409103106
Apel, K.-O. (1999). Die Situation des Menschen als ethicals Problem. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 28 (5), 677—693. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:14223
Jonas, G. (2001). The Principle of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Kyiv: Libra [in Ukrainian].
Boychenko, N.M. (2016). Ethical values of the modern university education: Philosophical reflection. Dissertation for Doctor of Philosophy. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Science and Science of Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
