Reviewing

We generally use the following submissions processing. We assesses the submission's compliance with the journal's requirest and the completeness of the Submission. Then  we appoint two Reviewers for the submission evaluation. All journal Submissions are subject to technical check for compliance with submission requirements, an open check in the StrikePlagiarism system with determination of the similarity coefficient and assessment of the use of AI and peer review (currently it is double-blind review, but the Editorial Office reserves the right to change the policy to use other types of peer review: blind or open, which will be announced on the website). The number of Reviewers may be increased in controversial cases. Review period can be four weeks and more. Finally, the Editor-in-Chief or their Deputy makes the submission accepting  decision  for the publication.

As Reviewer can be an expert in the field of the manuscript who has no unresolved conflict of interest and is not a participant in the research described in the paper.

The e-questionnaire has been prepared in the system for reviewers. 

The commitments of reviewers :
• reviewers have not to allow others to read what the authors have written;
• reviewers have not to make offensive or personal comments;
• reviewers should declare any conflicts of interest;
• reviewers should not directly communicate with the authors;
• the reviewer's feedback should be constructive and unbiased;
• the reviewer's feedback should facilitate the progress of both the author's thinking and writing skills.