TO THE PROBLEMS OF REPRODUCTION OF NATIONAL CAPITAL UNDER GLOBAL-LOCAL CHALLENGES: ON THE NATIONAL COMPONENT OF UKRAINE’S PRODUCTIVE AND COMMODITY CAPITAL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2026.03.003

Keywords:

business cycle; economic growth; economic mathematical models; productive, commodity, social capital; neo-industrial and smart capital; circuit and turnover of capital; reproduction of capital; composition of capital; state-national and state-capitalist appropriation; mobilization-liberal type of economic policy

Abstract

A number of relevant problems of reproduction of national capital under global-local challenges are considered. The research boundaries of orthodox models of business cycle, economic growth, general equilibrium and "input-output" are outlined, in particular, their focus on empirical and applied issues and a certain detachment from fundamental theoretical analysis. The theory of reproduction of productive, commodity and social capital is updated in the context of the specific historical state of the national economy.

Attention is focused on: a) the reasons for the relatively low composition of national productive capital, the deterioration of the qualitative structure of fixed capital (outflows and withdrawals from the circuit of capital, deviant competitive actions of foreign capital, the relatively low level of professionalism of domestic entrepreneurs, etc.); b) the dangerous trend toward denationalization of the country's capital and the ways of transforming national appropriation into foreign appropriation, assimilation of the circuit of national capital by the circuit of foreign capital as important reasons for the slowdown and mutation of the industrial cycle of national capital; c) the imbalances in the ratio of: the value of the annual product of social capital to the volume of the money supply; the production and consumption of luxury goods to those of ordinary consumer goods; the real wages of hired workers to the value of their labor-power, and d) the impact of these imbalances on the reproduction of individual and social capital.

Recommendations are proposed for the accelerated expanded reproduction of national capital, its internal and external expansion (nationalization of the state and moderate state capitalization of the economy, channeling of expanded reproduction sources, growing a critical mass of national champions, transition to a mobilization-liberal economic policy, development and implementation of a state program for the development of national capital, etc.).

References

Tarasevych, V. (2026). To the problems of reproduction of national capital under global-local challenges: on the national component of Ukraine’s social and money capital. Economy of Ukraine. 69. 02(771). 03–27. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2026.02.003 [in Ukrainian].

Podlesnaya, V. (2016). Logical and historical foundations for the formation of socio-economic cycles. Kyiv. 344 p. [in Russian].

Lucas, R. (1996). Understanding business cycles. In: Estrin S., Marin A. Essential Readings in Economics. Р. 306—327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24002-9_17

Farmer, R. (2012). The evolution of endogenous business cycles. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. Working Paper 18284. 32 p. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18284

Mitchell, W., Burns, A. (1938). Statistical indicators of cyclical revivals. National Bureau of Economic Research. Bulletin 69. P. 1–12. URL: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c4251/c4251.pdf

Moore, G. (1961). Statistical Indicators of Cyclical Revivals and Recessions. National Bureau of Economic Research. Vol. 1. P. 184–260. URL: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c0727/c0727.pdf

Davidson, T. (2021). Report on Whether AI Could Drive Explosive Economic Growth. Open Philanthropy. URL: https://coefficientgiving.org/research/report-on-whether-ai-could-drive-explosive-economic-growth/

Jones, C. (2022). The End of Economic Growth? Unintended Consequences of a Declining Population. American Economic Review. Vol. 112. No. 11. P. 3489–3527. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201605

Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica. Vol. 60. No. 2. P. 323–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599

Howitt, P. (2018). Endogenous Growth Theory. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Macmillan Publishers Ltd. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK. P. 3632–3636. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2545

Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 98. No. 5. P. 71–102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725

Jones, C. (2019). Paul Romer: Ideas, Nonrivalry, and Endogenous Growth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. Vol. 121. No. 3. P. 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12370

Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., Syverson, C. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. Working Paper 24001. 46 p. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24001

Aghion, P., Jones, B., Jones, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth. In: Agrawal A., Gans J., Goldfarb A. (Eds.). The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. P. 237–290. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003.0009

Almeida, D., Naudé, W., Sequeira, T. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Discovery of New Ideas: Is an Economic Growth Explosion Imminent? IZA Discussion Paper Series. No. 16766. 52 p. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4709699

Nordhaus, W. (2021). Are We Approaching an Economic Singularity? Information Technology and the Future of Economic Growth. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 299–332. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20170105

Palacio-Vera, A. (2025). Learning from economic models: the case of DSGE models. Journal of Economic Methodology. Vol. 32. Iss. 4. P. 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2025.2537171

Marx, K., Engels, F. (1961). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 2. Works. Vol. 24. 589 p. [in Ukrainian].

Tarasevych, V. (2024). Toward theoretical understanding of smart economy. Economy of Ukraine. 67. 10(755). 92–112. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2024.10.092 [in Ukrainian].

Hlushchenko, S., Ivakhnenkov, S., Demkiv, S. (2021). Bank lending in Ukraine and simulation of credit activity by methods of system dynamics. Economy and Forecasting. No. 2. P. 101–127. https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2021.02.101 [in Ukrainian].

Tugan-Baranovskiy, M. (1914). Periodic Industrial Crises. History of English Crises. General Theory of Crises. Saint-Petersburg. 466 p. [in Russian].

Arzhevitin, S., Makarov, O., Krasnova, I. (2023). Monetization of the Global Economy: The Trends and Features. The Problems of Economy. No. 1 (55). P. 161–169. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2023-1-161-169 [in Ukrainian].

Makarov, O. (2021). Monetization of Ukraine’s economy: retrospective, current state and transformation perspectives. Collection of Scientific Papers "Scientific Notes". No. 25(4). P. 51–68. http://doi.org/10.33111/vz_kneu.25.21.04.05.033.039 [in Ukrainian].

Kolot, A., Herasymenko, O. (2021). Labor XXI: philosophy of change, challenges, vectors of development. Kyiv. 487 p. [in Ukrainian].

Pokrytan, A., Lapin, V. (1982). Compensation fund of Department I and the problem of balance. M. 167 p. [in Russian].

Heyets, V. (2020). The phenomenon of instability as a challenge to economic development. Monograph. Kyiv, Akademperiodyka. 456 p. https://doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.403.456 [in Ukrainian].

Grytsenko, A. (2023). Nationally rooted economic development as a local response to the global geoeconomic shifts. Economy of Ukraine. 66. 4(737). 38–54. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.04.038 [in Ukrainian].

Zveryakov, M. (2025a). Formation of post-war economic development model based on a reproductive approach. Economy of Ukraine. 68. 11(768). 03–22. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2025.11.003 [in Ukrainian].

Zveryakov, M. (2025b). Creating a controlled model of accelerated development on a neo-industrial basis. Economy of Ukraine. 68. 12(769). 03–19. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2025.12.003 [in Ukrainian].

Tarasevych, V. (2017). A quarter of a century of Ukraine's independence: actual contexts and imperatives of socio-economic reforms (the end). Economy of Ukraine. No. 8. P. 14–28. URL: https://nasu-periodicals.org.ua/index.php/economyukr/article/view/2017-08-2 [in Ukrainian].

Published

23.03.2026

How to Cite

TARASEVYCH, V. (2026). TO THE PROBLEMS OF REPRODUCTION OF NATIONAL CAPITAL UNDER GLOBAL-LOCAL CHALLENGES: ON THE NATIONAL COMPONENT OF UKRAINE’S PRODUCTIVE AND COMMODITY CAPITAL . Economy of Ukraine, 69(3(772), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2026.03.003

Issue

Section

Scientific discussions