FORMATION OF POST-WAR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MODEL BASED ON A REPRODUCTIVE APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2025.11.003Keywords:
«catch-up development» model; reproductive approach; intensive type of reproduction; new industrialization; interactive growth management system; institutions of «catch-up development»Abstract
The paper highlights theoretical and methodological approaches to the formation of "catch-up development" model based on a reproductive approach, which is focused on ensuring economic growth through qualitative structural shifts occurring in the process of neo-industrialization of industry. It is emphasized that most modern economic concepts focus mainly on studying the sphere of circulation, while structural transformations in production often remain understudied. At the same time, it is the reproductive proportions that reflect the dialectical unity of the quantitative and qualitative content of economic dynamics, which allows to consider them as an objective indicator of progressive development. In a market environment, these proportions are expressed in the ratio between the volumes of final output and the price levels for factors of production. The necessity of using a reproductive approach for a clear distinction between the concepts of economic growth and development is substantiated: only a synchronous increase in production, labor productivity growth and an improvement in the organic structure of capital can be considered as a manifestation of true economic development based on new industrialization.
The author analyzes peculiarities of the reproductive process in the Ukrainian economy, where in the raw material sectors several cycles of capital reproduction have occurred over the past three decades, while most other industries were characterized by narrowed reproduction, which caused imbalances in the production structure. It is emphasized that in developed countries a gradual change in technological paradigms creates qualitative stages of labor productivity growth, while in Ukraine there is an objective need for state regulation of reproduction parameters. Such control is defined as an important component of industrial policy. The limitations of the mobilization innovation model oriented toward the VI technological paradigm are proven, and the feasibility of the accelerated development model based on new industrialization as an intensive form of the reproductive process is substantiated.
References
Laba, O. (2024). The current state and contradictions of the development of the international system of grant support for the economy in the context of postwar reconstruction of Ukraine. Economy and Society. (66). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-66-59 [in Ukrainian].
Khaustova, V. (Ed.) (2023). Post-war recovery of Ukraine’s economy: problems and solutions. Kharkiv. 240 p. URL: https://surl.li/kropno [in Ukrainian].
Pokrovska, N. (2022). Conceptual principles of post-war reconstruction of Ukraine, economic aspects. Visnik of the Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University. 4(274). 41-47. https://doi.org/10.33216/1998-7927-2022-274-4-41-47 [in Ukrainian].
O’Hanlon, M., Felbab-Brown, V. (2023). Reconstructing Ukraine: Creating a Freer, More Prosperous, and Secure Future. RAND Corporation. 124 p. URL: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2200-1.html
Heyets, V. (2020). Socialization and social quality as instruments of the state policy of socio-economic development. Economy of Ukraine. 63. 10(707). 3-18. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2020.10.003 [in Ukrainian].
Heyets, V. (2025). Socialization and social quality — from turbulence to laminarity. Kyiv, Akademperiodyka. 332 p. https://doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.535.332 [in Ukrainian].
Amsden, A. (2024). Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. Kyiv. 480 p. [in Ukrainian].
Johnson, Ch. (2023). MITI and the Japanese Miracle. The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. 2nd ed. Kyiv. 456 p. [in Ukrainian].
Ling, Ch. (2024). Manipulating Globalization. The Influence of Bureaucrats on Business in China. Kyiv. 256 p. [in Ukrainian].
Acemoglu, D., Zilibotti, F., Aghion, Ph. (2003). Vertical Integration and Distance to Frontier. Journal of the European Economic Association. Vol. 1. No. 2/3. P. 630-638. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322391260
Andrusevych, A., Kozak, Z. (2024). Post-war Green reconstruction of Ukraine: processes, stakeholders, public participation. Kyiv, Heinrich Böll Foundation. 83 p. URL: https://ua.boell.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/racse-report_eng_2024-5-13_1-2.pdf
Sen, A. (1977). Rational Fools: a Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theories. Philosophy and Public Affairs. Vol. 6 (Summer). P. 317-344. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2264946
Kurz, H. (2017). Geschichte des ökonomischen Denkens. München, Verlag C.H. Beck. 124 S.
Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M. (2003). International economics: Theory and Policy. 5th ed. New York, HarperCollins. 685 p.
Cohen, W. (2010). Chapter 4 – Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In: Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Vol. 1. P. 129-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01004-X
Rodrik, D. (2009). Industrial policy: Don’t ask why, ask how. Middle East Development Journal. Vol. 1. Iss. 1. P. 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793812009000024
Pokrytan, A., Zveryakov, M. (1994). The current crisis and the practice of reforms. Economy of Ukraine. No. 7. P. 14-25 [in Ukrainian].
Zveryakov, M. (2024). Structure of the national economy under global changes. Economy of Ukraine. 67. 12(757). 3-25. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2024.12.003 [in Ukrainian].
Zveryakov, M. (2020). Economic development in the era of “digital capitalism” formation. Economy of Ukraine. 63. 8(705). 3-23. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2020.08.003 [in Ukrainian].
Stiglitz, J. (2016). The State, the Market, and Development. WIDER Working Paper. No. 1. 51 p. https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2016/044-7
Eshchenko, P. (2013). Economic growth without development: reasons and ways of an innovative transformation of the economy. Economy of Ukraine. No. 10. P. 4-20. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/EkUk_2013_10_2 [in Ukrainian].
Novytskyi, V. (Project Manager) (2019). New industrialization is a real chance for Ukraine. Kyiv. 79 p. URL: https://uspp.ua/assets/doc/maket_nov_2019.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Publisher PH "Academperiodyka" of the NAS of Ukraine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
