Commemorative Practices of Ukrainians in Halychyna as an Element of the Formation and Preservation of National Memory (1920s-1950s)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2024.03.187

Keywords:

Halychyna, national memory, rural population, totalitarian regime, Soviet repressive authorities, Ukrainian national liberation movement

Abstract

The purpose is to reveal the commemorative practices of Ukrainians in Halychyna in the formation and preservation of national memory.

The research methodology is based on general theoretical principles and specifically historical methods of cognition, the use of which is aimed at objective coverage of the events, facts, and phenomena under study in the context of the current socio-political processes in dynamic development. The problematic and chronological method used in the preparation of the article made it possible to identify thematic plots in their dialectical relationship, to achieve a theoretical generalisation of the whole and parts, and to interact with organisational and structural elements.

The scientific novelty is marked by the author’s interpretation of the role of historical symbols in the formation and preservation of the national memory of Ukrainians in Halychyna, formed on the basis of the study of historical sources of various origins.

Conclusions. Having been defeated in the struggle for the restoration of the Ukrainian state in the early 1920s, Ukrainians in Halychyna faced a choice: either to dissolve into Polish society or to fi nd markers that would help preserve their national identity. One of the elements of preserving national identity was the tradition of honouring those who died for state and national independence. In the early 1920s, in Halychyna, the commemoration of fallen heroes took place in the form of public memorial services at the graves of the Ukrainian Sich Riflemen. At the end of the 1920s, the Society for the Protection of War Graves was founded on a public initiative that partially took over the care of military graves. At the same time, the Polish authorities tried, in various ways, to prevent the formation of new commemorative practices by Ukrainians, resorting to radical measures such as the physical destruction of the memorial symbols erected. In September 1939, an administration was established in Halychyna, which attempted to destroy all memorial signs and symbols that would remind Ukrainians of the struggle to restore an independent state. Despite the ideological context of the struggle with the graves of those who fought for the freedom of Ukraine, a characteristic feature of the newly arrived admi nistration is very clearly visible: a dismissive attitude towards its own dead. The study of commemorative practices of social groups allows scientists to see the ideas about the past of the members of those communities and to outline the factors that influence the construction of certain social ideas about the past in accordance with their worldview orientations. The way contemporaries see the past, what they notice and highlight in it, often vividly illustrates the current social mood. That is why the further progressive development of our community in the future will depend on how modern Ukrainians form collective ideas about the past.

References

Mirchuk, P. (1953). Ukrainska povstanska armiia (1942-1952). München. [in Ukrainian].

Sodol, P. (1994). Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49: Dovidnyk. New York. [in Ukrainian].

Lebed, M. (1946). Ukrainska Povstanska armiia: yii heneza, rist i dii u vyzvolnii borotbi ukrainskoho narodu za ukrainsku samostiinu sobornu derzhavu. Ch. 1. Vydannia Presovoho Biura UHVR. [in Ukrainian].

Shankovskyi, L. (1953). Ukrainska povstancha armiia. Istoriia ukrainskoho viiska. Winnipeg: 635-822. [in Ukrainian].

(1974). Yevhen Konovalets ta yoho doba. München. [in Ukrainian].

Rublov, O. S. (2004). Zakhidnoukrainska intelihentsiia u zahalnonatsionalnykh politychnykh ta kulturnykh protsesakh (1914-1939). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

(1993). Berezhanshchyna u spohadakh emihrantiv. Ternopil. [in Ukrainian].

(1998). Brody i Bridshchyna: Istorychno-memuarnyi zbirnyk. Kn. II. Brody. [in Ukrainian].

Volianiuk, S. (2018). Istoriia voiennoi okruhy UPA “Lysonia”. Ternopil. [in Ukrainian].

Volianiuk, S. (2021). Nad Zbruchem: Kamianets-Podilska hrupa UPA na Ternopilshchyni (druha polovyna 1944 r.). Lviv. [in Ukrainian].

Ilnytskyi, V. (2016). Karpatskyi krai OUN v ukrainskomu vyzvolnomu rusi (1945-1954). Drohobych. [in Ukrainian].

Ilnytskyi, V. (2018). Vyiavlennia ta likvidatsiia radianskymy represyvno-karalnymy orhanamy ukrainskykh, polskykh ta yevreiskykh orhanizatsii u m. Drohobych (1940 r.). Skhidnoievropeiskyi istorychnyi visnyk. 7: 120-150. [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058x.7.130646

Ilnytskyi, V., Kantor, N. (2019). Establishment of the soviet administration in the Carpa thian region through the use of the open forms of punishment (1944-1954). East European Historical Bulletin. 10: 181-192. doi: https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058x.10.159174

Romaniuk, M. (2016). Zolochivska okruha OUN u natsionalno-vyzvolnomu rusi (1937-1953). Lviv. [in Ukrainian].

Patryliak, I. K. (2012). “Vstan i borys! Slukhai i vir…”: ukrainske natsionalistychne pidpillia ta povstanskyi rukh (1939-1960 rr.). Lviv. [in Ukrainian].

Shatska, B. (2011). Mynule — Pamiat — Mit. Chernivtsi. [in Ukrainian].

Serhiichuk, V. (Ed.). (2005). Mytropolyt Andrei Sheptytskyi u dokumentakh radianskykh orhaniv derzhavnoi bezpeky (1939-1944 rr.). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Andrukhiv, I., Lysenko, O., Pylypiv, I. (2010). Stanislavska (Ivano-Frankivska) yeparkhiia UHKTs kriz pryzmu stolit: istoryko-relihiinyi aspekt. Nadvirna. [in Ukrainian].

Dzhadt, T. (2020). Pislia viiny: Istoriia Yevropy vid 1945 r. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Ilnytskyi, V., & Starka, V. (2024). Commemorative Practices of Ukrainians in Halychyna as an Element of the Formation and Preservation of National Memory (1920s-1950s). Ukrainian Historical Journal, (3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2024.03.187