HOMO EMPATHICUS AND HOMO ECONOMICUS AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF ILLUSIONS OR THE PSEUDOREFORMATION OF THE AGRARIAN SECTOR AS A RESULT OF THE EQUILIBRATION BETWEEN THE ETATISM AND THE “LAISSEZ FAIRE” PRINCIPLE

Authors

  • Iryna KHOMYN Ternopil’ National Economic University

Keywords:

agrarian sector, reformation, development, financial resources

Abstract

The results of studies of the problems of Ukraine’s agrarian sector testify that the reformation of the agrarian sector cannot be considered now completed, aince it was realized in many cases by the principle “one step forward and two ones backward.” But the solution of the problem of development of Ukraine’s economy is impossible without true reformation, rather than the imitated one. However, the experiment with the conservation of the invariable etatism and the dosed allowance of the “laissez faire” principle led to the mass appearance of agriholdings. This became the main tendency in Ukraine’s agriculture and made the harmonic development of the agrarian sector to be impossible, because the principal goal of the activity of such structures, namely the maximum profit, is attained exceptionally due to the specialization on the production of the most commercial kinds of products and leads to the exhaustion of resources (concentration on the production of grain crops and legumes, sunflower seeds, and sugar beets causes the degradation of lands due to, first of all, their excessive chemical intoxication; moreover, the number of cattle in farms does not increase). The long period of futile efforts to combine the etatism and the “laissez faire” principle in the agrarian sector has proved finally that the exit from the long!term crisis state is possible only if the measures directed to the ensuring of its development will fit the market principles of financial! economic regulation. This requires the overlooking of the tax and credit policies, since Ukraine can count on only the own forces under current conditions. The hope for the altruistic nonrepayable help is illusive. In this aspect, the priority belongs in the first turn to the ensuring of a balance of the crop production and the stockbreeding, which must guide all programs of stimulation of the development of the agrarian sector.

References

Borodina O.M., Prokopa I.V. Podolannya strukturnykh deformatsii v agrarnomu sektori Ukrainy: instytutsialiizatsiya i modernizatsiya malotovarnogo sil’s’kogospodars’kogo vyrobnytstva [Overcoming the structural deformations in Ukraine’s agrarian sector: institutionalization and modernization of a low"efficient agricultural production]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2015, No. 4, pp. 88–96 [in Ukrainian]. 95 Роздуми публіциста 2. Heyets V.M. Do pytannya zastosuvannya pidkhodiv “planu Marshalla” dlya Ukrainy [To the question of application of the approaches of the “Marshall plan” in Ukraine]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2015, No. 4, pp. 6–11 [in Ukrainian].

Tkachenko A.M., Alekseev A.A., Ilarionov V.V. et al. Fenomen Ukrainy: Reformy 1991–2004 gg. [Ukraine’s Phenomenon: Reforms 1991–2004]. Kiev, VIPOL, 2004 [in Russian].

Ambrosov V. Transformatsiini protsesy v agrarnii sferi ekonomiky [Transformation processes in economy’s agrarian sphere]. Ekon. APK – Economy of AIC, 2003, No. 6, pp. 66–70 [in Ukrainian].

Moldavan L.V., Shubravs’ka O.V. Investytsiini priorytety u sferi rozvytku agropromyslovogo vyrobnytstva Ukrainy ta mekhanizmy ikh realizatsii [Investment priorities in the sphere of development of Ukraine’s agriindustrial production and mechanisms of their realization]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2015, No. 4, pp. 78–87 [in Ukrainian].

Sharov O.M. Uroky ta perspektyvy “planu Marshalla” dlya Ukrainy [Lessons and perspectives of the “Marshall plan” for Ukraine]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2015, No. 4, pp. 12–18 [in Ukrainian].

Danylenko A.I. Posylennya derzhavnykh pidoim efektyvnogo vykorystannya finansovykh resursiv [Strengthening of state’s levers of efficient use of financial resources]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2015, No. 4, pp. 28–35 [in Ukrainian].

Smith A. Issledovanie o Prirode i Prichinakh Bogatstva Narodov [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations]. Moscow, Eksmo"Press, 2007 [in Russian].

Published

21.10.2024

How to Cite

KHOMYN, I. (2024). HOMO EMPATHICUS AND HOMO ECONOMICUS AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF ILLUSIONS OR THE PSEUDOREFORMATION OF THE AGRARIAN SECTOR AS A RESULT OF THE EQUILIBRATION BETWEEN THE ETATISM AND THE “LAISSEZ FAIRE” PRINCIPLE. Economy of Ukraine, 59(6(655), 87–95. Retrieved from https://nasu-periodicals.org.ua/index.php/economyukr/article/view/2016-06-8

Issue

Section

Reflections of the publicist