ORGANIZATION OF COMPLIANCE RISK ACCOUNTING IN INSURANCE ACTIVITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2026.02.086

Keywords:

compliance risk; insurance activities; environmental, social and governance principles; “three lines of defense”; double materiality; international standards Solvency II and CSRD

Abstract

Under the modern conditions of globalized financial market, insurance companies face complex challenges associated with functioning in a highly regulated legal field, where any deviations from regulatory requirements can cause systemic consequences. Compliance risks in this context become a critical factor that directly determines the level of financial resilience, preservation of reputation capital and long-term competitiveness of the institution.

A holistic model of the organization of compliance risk accounting in insurance activities, which organically integrates the environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles as a strategic imperative of modern business, has been developed. The conceptual apparatus, evolution of definitions and specifics of compliance risk in the insurance sector have been analyzed in detail; an extensive taxonomy of risks taking into account their intersection with operational, legal and reputational dimensions is presented; modern methods of identification, assessment and continuous monitoring are described, including relevant tools and scenario analysis. Particular attention is paid to the construction of structured risk registers, the definition and implementation of key compliance control (KCI) and risk (KRI) indicators as well as the integration of the system with the “three lines of defense” model, internal audit and corporate ESG strategy.

A step-by-step “roadmap” for the implementation of the model is proposed. The principle of double materiality as a tool for transparent non-financial reporting that takes into account the financial impact of ESG factors on the company is considered separately. Ways of adapting the proposed model to the specifics of Ukrainian insurance market in the context of active European integration, harmonization with EU directives (in particular, Solvency II, CSRD) and the need to counter new challenges, such as greenwashing, cyber threats and sanctions regimes, are presented.

References

Moskalenko, N. (2018). Theoretical aspects of introduction of complex control in Ukraine. Economic herald. Series: Finance, accounting, taxation. Vol. 2. P. 106–112. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ehsfat_2018_2_17 [in Ukrainian].

Mozharovskyi, M. (2021). Theoretical and legal analysis of “compliance” definition and its types. Law.ua. No. 2. P. 139–148. https://doi.org/10.32782/LAW.UA.2021.2.21 [in Ukrainian].

Nieizviestna, O. (2017). Research on the compliance practice in insurance companies of Ukraine. Actual Problems of Economics. No. 3. P. 267–273. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=ape_2017_3_32 [in Ukrainian].

Durán Santomil, P., Otero González, L. (2020). Enterprise risk management and Solvency II: The system of governance and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment. The Journal of Risk Finance. No. 21(4). P. 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-09-2019-0183

Published

20.02.2026

How to Cite

LUKIANCHUK, B. (2026). ORGANIZATION OF COMPLIANCE RISK ACCOUNTING IN INSURANCE ACTIVITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Economy of Ukraine, 69(2(771), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2026.02.086

Issue

Section

Insurance as a component of the state’s financial system