DIGITAL ECONOMY OF UKRAINE: SOME APPROACHES TO MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2025.08.003Keywords:
traditional economy; digital economy; information and communication technologies; digital products; ICT products; content and media sector; information and communication technologies sector; types of economic activity; economic growthAbstract
In the second half of the 1990s, intensive research into the digital economy foregrounded the task of assessing its size. However, it has not been fully accomplished to date. One of the reasons for this is the lack of an accurate conceptual definition of the digital economy, objective criteria that would allow it to be described at different structural levels and compared across countries.
Approaches to solving some of the above problematic issues are substantiated. It is proposed to consider the digital economy as a set of economic activities that ensure the production, circulation and consumption of digital and ICT goods and services in the national economy. Based on the definition, the macrostructural levels of analysis of the digital economy are specified. Their list, which includes the ICT sector, the “narrow” and “broad” digital economies, is supplemented by a new level, which involves the study of the basic digital economy, which ensures the production of both digital and ICT products. It has been hypothesized that the accuracy of measuring the size of the national digital economy can be improved if the methodology for its assessment is based on the indicator of the volume of the basic digital economy rather than the ICT sector.
Testing the hypothesis with Ukraine as an example has made it possible to reach theoretical and applied generalizations that prove its accuracy. It is found that during 2016–2021 the average annual value of the ICT sector was 3.2%, and that of the basic digital economy – 5.0% compared to GDP, i. e., the difference between them was 1.8 pp, and in relative terms – 37.3%. Failure to take this difference into account leads to a considerable underestimation of the real size of the domestic digital economy.
The facts collected in the paper show that, compared to economically developed countries, the basic digital economy in Ukraine had a much smaller impact on the digital transformation of enterprises and the national economy. In 2021 in Ukraine the “broad” digital economy exceeded the basic one by a factor of 2.4, while, for example, in the USA – by a factor of 7, and in Japan and China – by a factor of 5.
References
Bukht, R., Heeks, R. (2018). Defining, Conceptualising and Measuring the Digital Economy. International Organisations Research Journal. Vol. 13. No. 2. Р. 143-172. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-02-07
Goldfarb, A., Tucker, С. (2019). Digital Economics. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 57. No. 1. P. 3-43. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452
Watanabe, C., Naveed, K., Tou, Y., Neittaanmäki, P. (2018). Measuring GDP in the digital economy: Increasing dependence on uncaptured GDP. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. No. 137. Р. 226-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.053
Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T., Bação, F., Irani, Z. (2017). Assessing the pattern between economic and digital development of countries. Information Systems Frontiers. Vol. 19. Р. 835-854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9634-1
Heyets, V. (2022). Social reality in the digital space. Economy of Ukraine. 65. 01(722). 03-28. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.003 [in Ukrainian].
Grytsenko, A. (2022). Information-digital stage of development of socio-economic systems. Economy of Ukraine. 65. 01(722). 29-46. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.029 [in Ukrainian].
Shevchenko, I., Rusina, Y., Filipishyna, L., Marushchak, S., Pustovoit, O. (2023). Digital trade in global markets. Revista Electrónica De Investigación En Ciencias Económicas. Vol. 11. No. 21. Р. 19-32. https://doi.org/10.5377/reice.v11i21.16517
Lyashenko, V., Vyshnevskyi, O. (2018). Digital modernization of Ukraine's economy as an opportunity for breakthrough development. Kyiv. 252 p. URL: https://iie.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/monografiyi/2017/Lyashenko_Vishnevsky_2018.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Pyshchulina, O. (2020). Digital Economy: Trends, Risks, and Social Determinants. Kyiv. 274 p. URL: https://razumkov.org.ua/uploads/article/2020_digitalization.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Korepanov, O. (2018). Statistical Classification of Products in the Sector of Information and Communication Technologies. The Problems of Economy. No. 2(36). P. 375-381. URL: https://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2018-2_0-pages-375_381.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Mantsurov, I., Khrapunova, Ya., Omelchenko, V., Barvynok, A. (2022). Methodology of statistical assessment of the digital transformation of Ukraine state and dynamics. Economy of Ukraine. 65. 03(724). 39-56. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.03.039 [in Ukrainian].
Yanenkova, I. (2022). Factors and ways of development of digitalization in Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine. 65. 03(724). 4-22. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.03.004 [in Ukrainian].
Pustovoit, O. (2019). Intangible resources of economic growth. Economy of Ukraine. 62. 09-10(694-695). 44-67. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2019.09.044 [in Ukrainian].
Vyshnevskyi, V. (2022). Digital technologies and problems of industrial development. Economy of Ukraine. 65. 01(722). 47-66. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.047 [in Ukrainian].
Dulska, I. (2024). The role of creative industries digitization in wartime and during postwar recovery of Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine. 67. 07(752). 70-93. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2024.07.070 [in Ukrainian].
Yanenkova, I. (2024). Mechanism for ensuring digital industrialization as a factor of sustainability of nationally rooted development. Economic Theory. No. 4. P. 29-48. https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2024.04.029 [in Ukrainian].
Grytsenko, A., Burlai, T. (2020). The impact of digitalization on social development. Economic Theory. No. 3. P. 24-51. https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2020.03.024 [in Ukrainian].
Ostashko, T., Venger, V., Pustovoit, O. et al. (2024). The impact of multipolar globalization on Ukraine's foreign trade. Kyiv. 330 p. P. 41-44. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XvUb7xKnTCeAfmNByMYrtxCZG3t8OcjQ/view [in Ukrainian].
Corrado, С., Hulten, С., Sichel, D. (2009). Intangible capital and U.S. economic growth. Review of Income and Wealth. Series 55. No. 3. Р. 661-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00343.x
Škare, M., Porada-Rochon, M. (2021). Digital Leaders vs. Digital Followers: Convergence Theory. ESIC Digital Economy and Innovation Journal. 1(1). 14-37. https://doi.org/10.55234/edeij-1-1-001
Pustovoit, O. (2022). Ukraine’s post-war economy: international aid and growth policy. Economy and Forecasting. No. 3. P. 75-98. https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2022.03.075 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Publisher PH "Academperiodyka" of the NAS of Ukraine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
