BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS: AN EPISTEMIC TURN IN THE INTERPRETATION OF RATIONALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2019.07.003Keywords:
choice; cognitive distortion; cognitive processes; rationality; heuristicsAbstract
The purpose of the article is to formulate a hypothesis regarding the relationship and dynamic balance between normative and descriptive epistemology, which is established in the process of interpreting rational human behavior to create and accumulate congruent economic knowledge.
In the face of growing complexity and uncertainty of the external environment, the role of critical thinking skills is increasing, which intensify the cognitive co-evolution of a person and environment by neutralizing evolutionarily formed cognitive dysfunctions. As an axiological nucleus it is proposed to use the theory of rational choice – the standard of human behavior, which contributes to the diffusion of complexity and uncertainty of the external environment. However, the presence of an axiological nucleus is a necessary but not sufficient condition, which allows it to be adequately integrated with the subject substrate. For this, one requires the relevant knowledge of those behavioral features that are presented by the epistemic periphery that dynamically changes and also permanently detects and fixes the properties and characteristics of the neural substrate, its phenomenology and behavioral characteristics. The knowledge being accumulated on the epistemic periphery of economic science allows adequately reloading the programs of the human mind to bring them into line with modern requirements for the cognitive abilities of economic agents, and also to create an internally holistic and consistent system of economic knowledge, which will take into account the complexity and multidimensional development of human-sized systems.
The epistemic balance of normative and descriptive epistemology in the context of the interpretation of rational behavior may lie in a hypothesis that eliminates the dichotomy of normative and positive economic knowledge and is based on taking into account the structure of human cognitive processes, as well as the growing complexity and uncertainty of the external environment.
References
Fetisov G.G., Khudokormov A.G. Mirovaya Ekonomicheskaya Mysl'. Skvoz'
Prizmu Vekov, v: Vsemirnoe Priznanie: Lektsii Nobelevskikh Laureatov. V 5 t. [World
Economic Thought. Through the Prism of Centuries, in: World Recognition: Lectures by
Nobel Laureates. In 5 volumes]. Moscow, Mysl', 2004, Vol. 5 [in Russian].
Stepin V.S. Klassika, Neklassika, Postneklassika: Kriterii Razlicheniya, v:
Postneklassika: Filosofiya, Nauka, Kul'tura [Classics, Non Classics, Post Non Classics:
Criteria for Distinguishing, in: Post Non Classics: Philosophy, Science, Culture]. SPb,
PH "Mir", 2009, pp. 249-295 [in Russian].
Razumovs'kyi S.A. Ratsional'nist' "ekonomichnoi lyudyny" [The rationality of the
"economic man"]. Humanitarnyi chasopys - Humanitarian almanac, 2009, No. 1,
pp. 68-77, available at: nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/gumc_2009_1_11 [in Ukrainian].
Maturana H., Varela F. Drevo Poznaniya: Biologicheskie Korni Chelovecheskogo
Ponimaniya [The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding].
Moscow, Progress Traditsiya, 2001 [in Russian].
Weber M. Obraz Obshchestva. Izbrannye Sochineniya [The Image of Society.
SelectedWorks]. Moscow, Yurist, 1994 [in Russian].
Habermas J. Tekhnika i Nauka kak "Ideologiya" [Technology and Science as
"Ideology"]. Moscow, Praksis, 2007 [in Russian].
Habermas J. Moral'noe Soznanie i Kommunikativnoe Deistvie [Moral Consciousness
and Communicative Action]. SPb, Nauka, 2001 [in Russian].
Levit S.Ya. Kul'turologiya. XX Vek: Antologiya [Culturology. XX Century:
Anthology]. Moscow, Yurist, 1995 [in Russian].
Simon H. Ratsional'nost' kak protsess i product myshleniya [Rationality as a process
and as product of thought]. Teoriya i istoriya ekonomicheskikh i sotsial'nykh institutov i si3
stem - THESIS, 1993, No. 3, pp. 16-38 [in Russian].
doi.org/10.1177/072551369403800103
Simon H., Smithburg D., Thompson V. Menedzhment v Organizatsiyakh [Public
Administration]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 1995 [in Russian].
Vatamaniuk O.Z. Ratsional'nist' povedinky lyudyny v ekonomichnii nautsi:
kontseptsiya obmezhenoi ratsional'nosti [Rationality of human behavior in economics:
bounded concept rationality]. Ekonomichna teoriya ta pravo - Economic theory and law,
, No. 3, pp. 11-25, available at: nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnyua_etp_2018_3_3 [in
Ukrainian].
Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Prinyatie Reshenii v Neopredelennosti: Pravila
i Predubezhdeniya [Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases]. Kharkov,
Gumanitarnyi tsentr, 2005 [in Russian].
Sloman S.A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological
Bulletin, 1996, No. 1, pp. 3-22.
Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for
the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2000, No. 5, pp. 645-726.
Evans J.St.B.T. Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social
cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, Vol. 59, pp. 255-278.
doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
Bezgin K.S. Upravlenie Protsessom Sozdaniya Tsennosti na Predpriyatii:
Polisub"ektnost' i Kollaboratsiya [Managing the Process of Creating Value in an
Enterprise: Polysubjectivity and Collaboration]. Kharkov, NTMT, 2015 [in Russian].
Mlodinow L. (Neo)soznannoe. Kak Bessoznatel'nyi Um Upravlyaet Nashim
Povedeniem [Subliminal: How Your Unconscious Mind Rules Your Behavior]. Moscow,
Livebook, 2012 [in Russian].
Graves Ph. Klientologiya. Chego na Samom Dele Khotyat Vashi Pokupateli
[Consumerology: The Market Research Myth, the Truth About Consumers, and the
Psychology of Shopping]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2013 [in Russian].
Wegner D.M. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA., the MIT Press,
Kenrick D., Griskevicius V. Ratsional'noe Zhivotnoe. Sensatsionnyi Vzglyad na
Prinyatie Reshenii [The Rational Animal: How Evolution Made Us Smarter Than We
Think]. SPb, Piter, 2015 [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
