FORMATION OF NATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND FOREIGN TRADE RELATIONS OF UKRAINE (XVI–XVII CENTURIES)

Authors

Keywords:

entrepreneurship, history of economic development, foreign trade relations, organizational forms of management, institutional mechanisms

Abstract

The process of establishment of entrepreneurship on Ukrainian territory during the XVI-XVII centuries has been analyzed. Historical conditions for the development of market relations and primary accumulation of capital have been comprehensively researched. Institutional mechanisms for the formation of the basic elements of the entrepreneurial environment – private property, economic freedom, labor market and competition – are characterized. Role of foreign trade relations in the development of the economy on Ukrainian lands is determined. Directions and structure of trade are presented. Counteraction of internal mechanisms and external factors of transformation of Ukrainian economy is shown.
Preservation and strengthening of feudal forms of dependence hampered the development of market institutions. Industrial production used wage labor. There were dependent peasants that worked in estates. Export structure was mainly agrarian and raw materials type. Concentration of property hindered development of market and competition.
Economic and political conditions for the formation of entrepreneurial environment developed in the middle of the XVII century. Elimination of landowning of Polish tycoons and abolition of serfdom opened up opportunities for development of the national market. The policy of Ukrainian Cossack state (which professed mercantilism) contributed to the development of industrial production and foreign trade. Farms were formed on southern and eastern lands. Mastering of new lands and establishment of settlements promoted development of agrarian entrepreneurship. New conditions for production and export of Ukrainian goods on the basis of private entrepreneurship formed at the end of the XVII century.

References

Smolii V., Stepankov V. Ukrains’ka Natsional’na Revolyutsiya XVII st. (1648–1676 rr.) [Ukrainian National Revolution of the XVII Century (1648-1676)]. Kyiv, PH “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”, 2009 [in Ukrainian].

Strishenets’ M.M. Istoriya Zalizorobnykh Promysliv Ukrainy [History of Iron-Making Industries in Ukraine]. Kyiv, PH NMK VO Ukrainy, 1991 [in Ukrainian].

Filipenko A.S. Mizhnarodni Ekonomichni Vidnosyny: Istoriya [International Economic Relations: History]. Kyiv, Lybid’, 2006 [in Ukrainian].

Goshko T. Narysy z Istorii Mahdeburz’koho Prava v Ukraini (XVI – Pochatok XVII st.) [Essays on History of Magdeburg Law in Ukraine (XVI - early XVII century)]. Lviv, Afisha, 2002 [in Ukrainian].

Chutkyi A.I. Narysy z Ekonomichnoi Istorii Ukrainy, Kn. 2: Stanovlennya Zhytnytsi Evropy (Druha Polovyna XV – Persha Polovyna XVII st.). [Essays on Economic History of Ukraine, Book 2: Formation of the Breadbasket of Europe (the second half of the XV - the first half of the XVII century)]. Kyiv, Tempora, 2015 [in Ukrainian].

Gorin N.O. Normatyvno-pravova rehlamentatsiya pidpryemnytstva na ukrayins’kykh terenakh v XI–XVI st., v: Istoriya narodnoho hospodarstva ta ekonomichnoi dumky Ukrainy: zb. nauk. Prats’ [Normative and legal regulation of entrepreneurship on Ukrainian territory in the XI-XVI centuries, in: History of the national economy and economic thought of Ukraine: Collection of scientific works]. Kyiv, Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine, 2016, Issue 49, pp. 64–78 [in Ukrainian].

Bodnarchuk T.L. Retrospektyvnyi pohlyad na rol’ protektsionizmu u rozvytku pidpryyemnyts’koho klasu [Hind sight analysis of the protectionism role in the development of entrepreneurial class]. Ukrains’kyi sotsium – Ukrainian Society, 2016, No. 2 (57), pp. 48–60 [in Ukrainian].

Strumilin S.G. Chernaya Metallurgiya v Rossii i v SSSR [Ferrous Metallurgy in Russia and in the USSR]. Moscow-Leningrad, PH of the AS of the USSR, 1936 [in Russian].

Nebrat V.V., Suprun N.A. et al. Evolyutsiya Rynkovykh Instytutiv v Ukraini, u 2 ch. Part I [The Evolution of Market Institutions in Ukraine, in 2 parts. Part I]. V.V. Nebrat (Ed.). Kyiv, Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine, 2012 [in Ukrainian].

Voblii K.G. Ekonomicheskaya Geografiya Ukrainy [Economic Geography of Ukraine]. Kyiv, Printing house of the Provincial Board, 1919 [in Russian].

Grushevsky M. Ilyustrovana Istoriya Ukrainy [Illustrated History of Ukraine]. Kyiv – Wien, PH J.N. Vernay, 1921 [in Ukrainian].

Braudel F. Material’na Tsyvilizatsiya, Ekonomika i Kapitalizm, XV–XVIII st. T. 2: Ihry Obminu [Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century. Vol. 2: The Wheels of Commerce]. Kyiv, Osnovy, 1997 [in Ukrainian].

Acemoglu D., Robinson J. Chomu Natsii Zanepadayut’. Pokhodzhennya Vlady, Bahatstva ta Bidnosti [Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty]. Kyiv, Nash format, 2016 [in Ukrainian].

Reinert E.S. Yak Bahati Krainy Zabahatily... i Chomu Bidni Krainy Lyshayut’sya Bidnymy [How Rich Countries Got Rich ... and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor]. Kyiv, Tempora, 2014 [in Ukrainian].

Nebrat V.V. Zarodzhennya ta rozvytok finansiv yak instytutiv ukrayins’koi derzhavnosti v konteksti politychnoho ta ekonomichnoho protystoyannya XVI–XVIII st. [Origin and development of finances as the institutions of Ukrainian statehood in the context of political and economic antagonism XVI-XVIII centuries]. Ukrains’kyi sotsium – Ukrainian Society, 2012, No. 1 (40), pp. 115–126 [in Ukrainian].

Bagalei D. Materialy dlya Istorii Kolonizatsii i Byta Khar’kovskoi i Otchasti Kurskoi i Voronezhskoi Gubernii. T.1. [Materials for the history of colonization and life of Kharkov and, in part, Kursk and Voronezh provinces. Vol. 1]. Kharkov, PH K.L. Schasny, 1886 [in Russian].

Published

16.10.2024

How to Cite

NEBRAT , V. (2024). FORMATION OF NATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND FOREIGN TRADE RELATIONS OF UKRAINE (XVI–XVII CENTURIES) . Economy of Ukraine, 60(8(669), 73–85. Retrieved from https://nasu-periodicals.org.ua/index.php/economyukr/article/view/2017-08-6

Issue

Section

From the history of economic thought