SPATIAL ORGANIZATION AND DIRECTIONS OF USE OF UKRAINE’S NATURAL WEALTH
Keywords:
natural wealth, spatial organization, efficiencyAbstract
The natural wealth as a component of the national wealth should be considered, first of all, as the natural capital, which can be directly used as a material-energetic resource of the development of the national economy. The modern form of existence of the natural wealth is defined to be the natural-anthropogenous territorial socio-ecologo-economic system. For the efficient functioning and sustainable development of such system, it is necessary to study the spatial aspects of its formation and usage. Till now, no complex estimate of the spatial organization of the natural wealth has been performed. Therefore, this task remains actual for the modern economic science.
The purpose of the present work is the determination of a spatial organization of the natural wealth from positions of the system methodology with regard for its economic, ecological, and social functions with the purpose to increase the efficiency of its use in state’s economic activity. The object of studies is the natural wealth as a natural capital, which is organized in country’s economic space and is actual for the usage in the national economy. The subject of studies is the spatial organization of the natural wealth. Its modern interpretation as the spatial organization of the natural capital in the national economic complex formed as a result of the physico-geographical, economic, historical, and other natural-anthropogenous factors and processes is substantiated.
The main spatial levels such as national, regional, and local ones are defined. On them, the formation, assessment, and usage of the natural wealth occur by the principles of the “green” economy, “blue” economy, and nanoeconomics. On the basis of the aggregated estimates of the value of the natural wealth of Ukraine and its regions, the complex estimation of its spatial organization is implemented. To increase the efficiency of the usage of the natural wealth, a spatial-institutional model is proposed. It is based on the concept of spatial-decentralized responsible corporative management and the projectively active approach with the ensuring of the profitability and efficiency of the usage of the natural actives of integrative territorial natural-economic complexes. By the results of studies of the spatial organization of the natural wealth, an advance project of Ukraine’s natural-economic zoning is proposed.
References
Rudenko V.P. Geografiya Pryrodno-Resursnogo Potentsialu Ukrainy, u 3 ch. [Geography of Ukraine’s Natural-Resource Potential, 3 Parts]. Chernivtsi, Chernivtsi Nat. Univ., 2010, Part 3 [in Ukrainian].
Rudenko V.P. Geograficheskoe Raznoobrazie Prirodno-Resursnogo Potentsiala Regionov Ukrainy [Geographic Diversity of the Natural-Resource Potential of Ukraine’s Regions]. – Krasnoyarsk, KSТEI, 2007 [in Russian].
Rudenko V.P. Dovidnyk z Geografii Pryrodno-Resursnogo Potentsialu Ukrainy [Handbook on the Geography of Ukraine’s Natural-Resource Potential]. Kyiv, Vyshcha Shkola, 1993 [in Ukrainian].
Instytutsionalizatsiya Pryrodno-Resursnykh Vidnosyn, za red. M.A. Khvesyka [Institutionalization of Natural-Resource Relations], edited by M.A. Khvesyk. Kyiv, IENMSD of the NASU, 2012 [in Ukrainian].
Khvesyk M., Bystryakov I., Klynovyi D., Lyzun S. Zmistovni oznaky kompleksnoi ekonomichnoi otsinky pryrodnogo bagatstva Ukrainy [Informative signs of a complex economic estimate of Ukraine’s natural wealth]. Ekonomist – Economist, 2014, No. 12, pp. 4–9 [in Ukrainian].
Kompleksna Ekonomichna Otsinka Pryrodnykh Resursiv, za red. M.A. Khvesyka [Complex Economic Estimate of Natural Resources], edited by M.A. Khvesyk. Kyiv, IENMSD of the NASU, 2013 [in Ukrainian].
Kapitalizatsiya Ekonomiky Ukrainy, za red. V.M. Geitsya, A.A. Grytsenka [Capitalization of Ukraine’s Economy], edited by V.M. Heyets, A.A. Grytsenko. Kyiv, Inst. for Economics and Forecast. of the NASU, 2007 [in Ukrainian].
Kvak M. Natsional’ne bagatstvo Ukrainy: stan ta perspektyvy [Ukraine’s national wealth: state and perspectives]. Visn. Ternop. Nats. Ekon. Univ. – Bull. of Ternop. Nat. Econ. Univ., 2008, No. 1, pp. 29–36 [in Ukrainian].
Klynovyi D.V., Petrovs’ka I.O. Kontseptual’ni zasady kompleksnoi otsinky pryrodnogo bagatstva Ukrainy [Conceptual principles of a complex estimate of Ukraine’s natural wealth]. Zbir. Nauk. Prats’ Nats. Univ. Derzh. Podat. Sluzh. Ukrainy – Coll. of Sci. Works of Nat. Univ. State Tax. Serv. of Ukraine, 2014, No. 1, pp. 105–111 [in Ukrainian].
Matyukha V.V. Shchodo pytannya kompleksnoi ekonomichnoi otsinky mineral’no-resursnogo potentsialu [To the question of a complex economic estimate of the mineral-resource potential]. Mekh. Reg. Ekon. – Mech. of Regul. of Econ., 2012, No. 1, pp. 39–46 [in Ukrainian].
Natsional’ne Bagatstvo Ukrainy, za red. S.I. Doroguntsova [Ukraine’s National Wealth], edited by S.I. Doroguntsov. Kyiv, CSPFU, NAS of Ukraine, 2005 [in Ukrainian].
Bobukh I.M. Propozytsii ta Perspektyvy Formuvannya Natsional’nogo Bagatstva Ukrainy [Proposals and Perspectives of Formation of Ukraine’s National Wealth]. Kyiv, Inst. for Economics and Forecast. of the NASU, 2010 [in Ukrainian].
Khvesyk M.A., Zbagers’ka N.V. Ekonomichna Otsinka Pryrodnykh Resursiv: Osnovni Metodologichni Pidkhody [Economic Estimate of the Natural Resources: Basic Methodological Approaches]. Rivne, RSTU, 2000 [in Ukrainian].
Meadows D.H., Randers J., Meadows D.L. Predely Rosta. 30 Let Spustya [Limits to Growth: The 30-year Update]. Moscow, Akademkniga, 2007 [in Russian].
Schumacher E.F. Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London, Blond and Briggs, 1973.
Pauli G. Synya Ekonomika: 10 Rokiv, 100 Innovatsii, 100 Mil’ioniv Robochykh Mists’ [The Blue Economy: 10 years – 100 innovations – 100 millions jobs]. Kyiv, Risk Reduction Foundation, 2012 [in Ukrainian].
Kleiner G. Nanoekonomika [Nanoeconomics]. Vopr. Ekon. – Quest. of Econ., 2004, No. 12, pp. 70–93 [in Russian].
Inshakov O.V. Ekonomicheskaya Genetika i Nanoekonomika [Economic Genetics and Nanoeconomics]. Volgograd, VolSU, 2007 [in Russian].
Arrow K. Reflections on the essays, in: Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy, edited by G.R. Feiwel. London, Macmillan, 1987.
Bystryakov I.K., Klynovyi D.V. Systemne vyznachennya ekonomichnoi otsinky pryrodnogo bagatstva Ukrainy [The system definition of an economic estimate of Ukraine’s natural wealth]. Visn. NAN Ukr. – Bull. of NAS of Ukr., 2015, No. 8, pp. 49–57 [in Ukrainian].
Popovkin V.A. Regional’no-Tsilisnyi Pidkhid v Ekonomitsi [The Regionally Integral Approach to the Economy]. Kyiv, CSPFU, NAS of Ukraine, Naukova Dumka, 1993 [in Ukrainian].
Kotler Ph., Berger R., Bickhoff N. Strategicheskii Menedzhment po Kotleru. Luchshie Priemy i Metody [The Quintessence of Strategic Management: What You Really Need to Know to Survive in Business]. Moscow, Al’pina Pablisher, 2012 [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Economy of Ukraine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
