PROTECTIONISM AS DETERMINANT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURING IN GREAT BRITAIN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.10.058

Keywords:

post-war recovery; industry; automotive industry; protectionism; import duties; statistics

Abstract

The tariff policy on imports, which was introduced in Great Britain at the beginning of the World War I and was in force for about 60 years, is considered. Based on historical facts and figures, it is substantiated on the example of the automotive industry that the so-called McKenna duties in the long term had an impact on the growth of production, employment, and budget revenues; led to a decrease in prices on the domestic market, a reduction in imports and an increase in exports, promoted foreign investments, the transfer of advanced technologies, and the wider engagement of local potential in business processes. It is demonstrated that the protective duties currently launched by the Indian government to regulate the import of goods, the production of which has been defined by the government as a priority (in particular, electric cars production is concerned), are a reflection of the measures implemented by Great Britain at the beginning of the 20th century. It is emphasized that protective tariffs for these goods in Ukraine are significantly lower. It is shown that the USA also uses import duties for national security purposes.
Taking into account the provisions of the GATT/WTO and the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement, as well as modern examples of their application, it is quite obvious that Ukraine, under the current conditions of external and internal challenges and institutional restrictions, can take advantage of the protectionist policy for the development of industry in the post-war recovery period, based on its right to determine "the most important exceptions for security reasons" in order to ensure the socio-economic and financial stability of the country and the welfare of the nation. In view of this, it is necessary to rethink the current Ukraine’s policy on automobile manufacturing, in particular as regards the foreign trade regulation, and to create a new policy based on effective protectionism theory and effective protection rate calculations, assessment of the current state and prospects of enterprises, the results of a professional discussion on the priorities of the industry: whether it should remain at semi knocked-down kit stage or aim for full-cycle production with a high level of localization.

References

Salikhova O. British dependence on German imports. Responses to the challenges of the World War I. History of economics and economic thought of Ukraine, 2021, Vol. 54, pp. 37-74 [in Ukrainian].

doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2021.54.037

Salikhova O.B., Krehivskyi O.V. The state in the post-war industrial recovery and economic renewal: historical parallels and approaches for Ukraine. Economics and forecasting, 2022, No. 4, pp. 7-42 [in Ukrainian].

doi.org/10.15407/eip2022.04.007

Mariotti S. A warning from the Russian-Ukrainian war: avoiding a future that rhymes with the past. Economics and forecasting, 2022, No. 3, pp. 7-32 [in Ukrainian].

doi.org/10.15407/eip2022.03.007

Hubert E. From Hyper-globalization to Global Value Chains Decoupling: Withering Global Trade Governance?

Sidenko V.R. War in Ukraine as a bifurcation point in global development: rhyming with the past versus creating the future. Economics and forecasting, 2023, No. 1, pp. 7-30 [in Ukrainian].

doi.org/10.15407/eip2023.01.007

Kindzerskyi Yu. Possibilities of applying the concept of an entrepreneurial state to ensure structural and innovative transformations during the post-war recovery of Ukraine's economy. Economic Analysis, 2023, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 37-45 [in Ukrainian].

doi.org/10.35774/econa2023.01.037

Wardley-Kershaw J., Schenk-Hoppé K.R. Economic Growth in the UK: Growth's Battle with Crisis. Histories, 2022, No. 2, pp. 374-404.

doi.org/10.3390/histories2040028

Morgan E.V. Studies in British Financial Policy, 1914-1925. London, 1952.

Feinstein Ch. National Income and Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom 1855-1965. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Krehivskyi O.V. Dependences and ways to eliminate them: a past that resonates with the present. Economics and forecasting, 2023, No. 1, pp. 31-75 [in Ukrainian].

doi.org/10.15407/eip2023.01.031

Church R.A. The rise and decline of the British motor industry. Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1994.

doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09863-7

Richardson K. The British motor industry, 1896-1939. Archon Books, 1977.

doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03388-1

Paton W.A. The Economic Position of the United Kingdom: 1912-1918. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1919.

Balderston T. War Finance and Inflation in Britain and Germany, 1914-1918. The Economic History Review, 1989, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 222-244.

doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1989.tb00495.x

Hirst F.W., Allen J.E. British War Budgets. London, Humphrey Milford [Oxford University Press], 1926.

Laybourn K. British Political Leaders: A Biographical Dictionary. ABC-CLIO, 2001.

Capie F. Depression and protectionism: Britain between the Wars. Boston, G. Allen & Unwin, 1983.

Plowden W. The Motor Car and Politics, 1896-1970. Bodley Head, 1971.

Motor vehicles. A report on the industry. PEP (political & economic planning). London, 1950.

Varian B.D. The growth of manufacturing protection in 1920s Britain. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, 2019, Vol. 66 (5), pp. 703-711.

doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12223

Trentmann F. Free Trade Nation: Commerce, Consumption, and Civil Society in Modern Britain. Oxford University Press, 2008.

Foreman-Peck J. Exit, Voice and Loyalty as Responses to Decline: The Rover Company in the Inter-War Years. Business History, 1981, Vol. 23, Iss. 2, pp. 191-207.

doi.org/10.1080/00076798100000030

Foreman-Peck J. Tariff Protection and Economies of Scale: The British Motor Industry before 1939. Oxford Economic Papers New Series, 1979, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 237-257.

doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041444

Allen G.C. The British Motor Industry. London and Cambridge Economic Service, London School of Economics, Special Memorandum, 1926. No. 18.

Dewey P.E. War and progress: Britain, 1914-1945. London; New York, Longman, 1997.

Buxton N.K., Aldcroft D.H. British Industry Between the Wars: Instability and Industrial Development 1919-1939. Scolar Press, 1979.

Southard F.A. American industry in Europe. New York, Arno Press, 1976.

Coomber I. Vauxhall: Britain's Oldest Car Maker. Fonthill Media, 2017.

Lewchuk W. American technology and the British vehicle industry. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Benham F. Great Britain Under Protection. Macmillan, 1941.

Mallet B., Oswald G.C. British Budgets: Third Series, 1921-22 to 1932-33. MacMillan and Company, Limited, 1933.

Sozanskyy L. Problems of the development of automotive industry in Ukraine. Socio‐economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine, 2022, Vol. 3 (155), pp. 47-52 [in Ukrainian].

doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2022-3-8

Krekhivskyi O., Salikhova O. Post-war industrial modernization: internal and external resources. Foreign trade: economics, finance, law. Series Economic Sciences, 2022, No. 6, pp. 101-121 [in Ukrainian].

Published

14.02.2024

How to Cite

KREKHIVSKYI , O. (2024). PROTECTIONISM AS DETERMINANT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURING IN GREAT BRITAIN. Economy of Ukraine, 66(10(743), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.10.058

Issue

Section

Foreign experience in managing economic processes