Application of the test-particle statistical method for the simulation of rarefied plume in a vacuum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2023.04.012Keywords:
Boltzmann equation, free molecular and transitional regimes, gas dynamic parameters, numerical calculations, plume flow, statistical simulation, the rarefied gas dynamics, the Test-Particle MethodAbstract
The article substantiates the important role of the problem of the supersonic jet outflow into a vacuum to control the motion of the center of mass, orientation, and stabilization of the spacecraft’s position in space. The types of low-thrust engines and microrocket engines viewed have plumes that can pass through all regimes from continuum to free-molecular. In zones where motion is described at the molecular-kinetic level, statistical methods are most often used. The statistical Test Particle Method (TPM) has so far been used only in rarefied homogeneous flows. The aim of this work is to develop the TPM for numerical modelling plume flows. Below are the basic tenets of the TPM and changes in its algorithm. The initial drawing of the trajectories of molecules is carried out either from the nozzle exit (in the absence of a dense core) or from the initial surface, which is the virtual border of the continuity zone. Determining the distributions over the surface of the drawing of the coordinates of the start and the mass velocity of the plume flow is decisive for obtaining adequate results. Among the considered launch options, the most realistic one is uneven, with a concentration on the plume axis. The calculation of the mass velocity of the plume flow at the initial surface can be performed using numerical methods of continuum aerodynamics or using approximate methods. The testing of TPM in the far field of a rarefied nitrogen plume was carried out by comparing the relative density distribution with the data of the approximate method. The results obtained in the presence of the initial sphere and in its absence agree with each other. The TPM testing in the area adjacent to the nozzle was carried out by comparing the isolines of relative density and Mach numbers with the results of direct Monte Carlo simulation for the experimental conditions of helium outflow from a low-thrust engine into a vacuum. Satisfactory agreement has been obtained between the numerical simulation data of the TPM and the compared data.References
Bass V. P., Pecheritsa L. L. (2007). Verification of Methods and Algorithms for the Solution of Problems of Transition Aerodynamics. Technical Mechanics, № 1, 49-61 [in Russian].
Belyaev N. M., Uvarov E. I. (1974). Calculation and Design of Rocket Control Systems for Space Vehicles. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 200 p. [in Russian].
Boltzmann L. (1956). Lecture on the Theory of Gases. Moscow: Gostekhizdat, 554 p. [in Russian].
Grishin I. A., Zakharov V. V., Lukyanov G. A. (1998). Paralleling with Data of Direct Monte-Carlo Simulation for Molecular Gas Dynamics. St. Petersburg, 32 p. [in Russian].
Dulov V. G., Lukyanov G. A. (1984). Gas Dynamics of Outflow Processes. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 223 p. [in Russian].
Feoktistov K. P. (Ed.) (1983). Spacecraft. Moscow: Voenizdat, 319 p. [in Russian].
Keivy L. (Ed.) (1988). Space Engines: State and Prospects. Moscow: Mir, 454 p. [in Russian].
Mejer E., Hermel J., and Rodgers A. V. (1987). Loss of Thrust Due to the Interaction of the Exhaust Jet with Constructional Elements of an Orbital Flying Vehicle. Bulletin PNRPU. Aerospace Engineering, № 8, 118-126 [in Russian].
Pecheritsa L. L., Paliy O. S. (2017). Application of the Method of Probe Particles to the Aerodynamic Calculation of Spacecraft. Technical Mechanics, № 3, 53-63 [in Russian].
https://doi.org/10.15407/itm2017.03.053
Rizhkov V. V., Sulinov A. V. (2018). Propulsion Systems and Low-Thrust Rocket Engines Based On Various Physical Principles for Control Systems of Small and Micro-Spacecraft. Vestnik of Samara University. Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, 17, № 4, 115-128 [in Russian].
https://doi.org/10.18287/2541-7533-2018-17-4-115-128
Shuvalov V. A., Levkovich O. A. & Kochubei G. S. (2001). Approximate Models of Exhaustion of a Supersonic Gas Jet into Vacuum. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 42, № 2, 237-242 [in Russian].
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018867601095
Boyd I. D., Jafry Y. R., Beukel J. V. (1994). Particle Simulation of Helium Micro Thruster Flows. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 31, № 2, 271-277.
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.26433
Dettleff G., Doetcher R. D., Dankert C., et al. (1986). Attitude Control Thruster Plume Flow Modelling and Experiments. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 23, № 5, 477-481.
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25832
Kovtun Y. V., Ozerov A. N., Skibenko E. I., & Yuferov V. B. (2015). Choice of Conditions for Gas Outflow in Vacuum and Configurations of a Forming Unit Feeding a Working Substance into the Plasma Volume. East Eur. J. Phys., 2, №2, 81-89.
https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2015-2-09
Roberts L., South J. C. (1964). Comments On Exhaust Flow Field and Surface Impingement. AIAA Journal, 2, № 5, 971-973.
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2443
Stasenko A. L. (1969). Criteria for the Determination of the "Limits" of Continuous Flow in a Freely Expanding Jet. J. of Engineering Physics, 16, 5-9.