Noospheric civilization: from prospects to a new reality

Authors

  • S.I. Pyrozhkov Presidium of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
  • N.V. Khamitov Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2018.02.071

Keywords:

civilizational subjectivity, V.I. Vernadsky, noosphere, metanthropological potentialism, noospheric civilization

Abstract

The article discusses the issue of the civilizational subjectivity of Ukraine in the conditions of the modern world, which, according to the authors, is possible only through its transformation into a subject of noospheric civilization, which, in turn, requires a profound ideological transformation, transformation of consciousness, and on this basis — the transformation of relations between individuals, countries, civilizations and civilizational worlds. To accomplish this complex task, consolidation of Ukrainian society and, above all, its intellectual part is needed, and the methodology of metanthropological potentialism can become the effective methodological tool.

References

Pyrozhkov S.I., Khamitov N.V. Civilization project of Ukraine: from ambitions to real opportunities. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2016. (6): 45. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2016.06.045

Vernadsky V.I. Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon. (Moscow: Nauka, 1991).

Pyrozhkov S.I., Khamitov N.V. Ukrainian society on the path of consolidation. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2017. (11): 43. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2017.11.043

Kutyrev V.A. Utopian and real in the doctrine of the noosphere. Priroda. 1990. (11): 3.

Vernadsky V.I. The Beginning and Eternity of Life. (Moscow, 1991).

Scheler M. Philosophische Weltanschauung. In: Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 9. (Bern/München: Francke-Verlag, 1979). S. 73.

Yanshina F.T. V. Vernadsky’s Noosphere: a utopia or a real perspective. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost. 1993. (1): 163.

Tabachkovsky V., Bulatov M., Khamitov N. et al. Philosophy: the world of man. (Kyiv: Lybid, 2003).

Moiseev N.N. Man and noosphere. (Moscow, 1990).

Pyrozhkov S.I. Labor potential in the demographic dimension. (Kyiv: Nauk. Dumka, 1992).

Khamitov N. Philosophy: existence, man, world. From metaphysics to metaanthropology. (Kyiv, 2017).

Khamitov N. Philosophical Anthropology: Actual Problems. From theoretical to practical turning. (Kyiv, 2017).

Weizsäcker E., Wijkman A. Come on! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. Report to the Club of Rome. (New York: Springer-Verlag, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7419-1

Khamitov N. (ed.). Philosophical anthropology: Dictionary. (Kyiv, 2016).

Krylova S.A. Social metaantropology as methodology of beauty research in social existence. New Paradigm. 2012. 104: 92.

Horbulin V.P. A cunning uncertainty of the new world order. Dzerkalo tyzhnya. No. 30. August, 27, 2016.

Horbulin V.P. What kind of Phoenix will be born out of the outbreak of the world hybrid war? Dzerkalo tyzhnya. No. 43–44. November, 18–24, 2017.

Civilization choice of Ukraine: the paradigm of thinking and action strategy: national report. (Eds. S.I. Pyrozhkov, О.М. Mayboroda, Y.Zh. Shaygorodsky et al.). (Кyiv, 2016).

Published

2018-02-22