On the Problem of Science Evaluation

Abstract

We discuss problems of scientific evaluation, making particular emphasis on research group evaluation. In order to perform such an assessments two basic approaches could be used: expert judgments and analysis of the citation history of publications. Each of these approaches has its advantages and drawbacks. Here we make a comparison and address the question of whether a set of automated, scientometric or bibliometric indicators is a suitable substitute for, or component of, peer-review at the level of the research group or department.