National resilience of the country: strategy and tactics of anticipation of hybrid threats
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2021.08.074Keywords:
national resilience, civilizational subjectivity, metaanthropological potentialism, national security, geopoliticsAbstract
In modern geopolitical conditions, the highest value of a country lies in its civilizational subjectivity, which makes the state truly independent. It has been shown that without subjectivity, independence becomes only a formality, a mask that covers the country's dependence on strong geopolitical players. That is why the resilience of the civilizational subjectivity of the country, which the authors characterize as national resilience, is extremely important. Based on the methodology of metaanthropological potentialism developed by the authors, national resilience is defined as a strategy to ensure balanced development and successful resistance to external and internal threats, and moreover as anticipating challenges and finding answers to them for decent self-realization and humanistic development. The external and internal dimensions of national resilience, as well as its priority areas are analyzed. The question of interaction of national resilience and national security is investigated, the problem of institutional maintenance of strategy of national resilience is put forward.
References
Pyrozhkov S.I., Khamitov N.V. Ukraine as a Civilizational Subject: from potencies to a new worldview and human ex-istence. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 2020. (in Ukraine). https://files.nas.gov.ua/PublicMessages/Documents/0/2021/01/210115213819467-3206.pdf
Pyrozhkov S.I., Khamitov N.V. Civilization project of Ukraine: from ambitions to real opportunities. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2016. (6): 45–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2016.06.045
Khamitov N.V. Philosophical Anthropology: Actual Problems. From theoretical to practical turn (Filosofska antropolo-hiia: aktualni problemy. Vid teoretychnoho do praktychnoho povorotu). Kyiv: KNT, 2019. (in Ukrainian).
Pyrozhkov S.I., Smolij V.A., Boriak H.V. et al. (eds). Ukraine as a Civilizational Subject of History and Modernity: Na-tional Report (Ukraina yak tsyvilizatsiinyi subiekt istorii ta suchasnosti: natsionalna dopovid). Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 2020. (in Ukrainian). https://files.nas.gov.ua/PublicMessages/Documents/0/2021/04/210428200554623-8252.pdf
Pyrozhkov S.I., Khamitov N.V. Is Ukraine a civilizational subject of history and modernity? Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2020. (7): 3–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2020.07.003
Bilуnska M., Korolchuk O. The role of national resilience in public administration reforming. Yearbook of Depart-ment “Administration and management”. 2018. 3(1): 24–45. (in Russian).
Chandra A., Acosta J.D., Howard S. et al. Building Community Resilience to Disasters: A Way Forward to Enhance Na-tional Health Security. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/TR915
Chandra A., Acosta J.D., Meredith L.S. Understanding Community Resilience in the Context of National Health Securi-ty: a literature review. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/WR737
Sherrieb K., Norris F., Galea S. Measuring capacities for community resilience. Social Indicators Research. 2010. 99(2): 227–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9576-9
Chandra A., Williams M., Plough A., Stayton A., Wells K.B., Horta M., Tang J. Getting actionable about community resilience: the Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience Project. American Journal of Public Health. 2013. 103(7): 1181–1189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301270
Norris F.H., Stevens S.P., Pfefferbaum B., Wyche K.F., Pfefferbaum R.L. Community resilience as a metaphor, theo-ry, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2008. 41(1-2): 127–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
Winston S. Churchill. Quotes. The International Churchill Society. https://winstonchurchill.org/publications/finest-hour/finest-hour-150/churchill-on-russia/
